The destruction of Assange has
clearly been arranged for, at the highest levels of the U.S. Government, just
as the destruction of Jamal Khashoggi was by Saudi Arabia’s Government.
November 18, 2018
By
On June 28th, the Washington
Examiner headlined “Pence pressed
Ecuadorian president on country’s protection of Julian Assange” and reported that “Vice President Mike Pence
discussed the asylum status of Julian Assange during a meeting with Ecuador’s
leader on Thursday, following pressure from Senate Democrats who have voiced
concerns over the country’s protection of the WikiLeaks founder.” Pence had
been given this assignment by U.S. President Donald Trump. The following day,
the Examiner bannered “Mike Pence
raises Julian Assange case with Ecuadorean president, White House confirms” and reported that the White House had told the
newspaper, “They agreed to remain in close coordination on potential next steps
going forward.”
On August 24th, a court-filing by Kellen S. Dwyer, Assistant
U.S. Attorney for the Alexandria Division of the Eastern District of Virginia, stated: “Due to the sophistication of the defendant
and the publicity surrounding the case, no other procedure [than sealing the
case, hiding it from the public] is likely to keep confidential the fact that
Assange has been charged. … This motion and the proposed order would need to
remain sealed until Assange is arrested in connection with the charges in the
criminal complaint and can therefore no longer evade or avoid arrest and
extradition in this matter.” That filing was discovered by Seamus Hughes, a
terrorism expert at the Program on Extremism at George Washington University.
On November 15th, he posted an
excerpt of it on Twitter,
just hours after the Wall Street Journal had reported on the
same day that the Justice Department was preparing to prosecute Assange.
However, now that we know “the fact that Assange has been charged” and that the
U.S. Government is simply waiting “until Assange is arrested in connection with
the charges in the criminal complaint and can therefore no longer evade or
avoid arrest and extradition in this matter,” it is clear and public that the
arrangements which were secretly made between Trump’s agent Pence and the
current President of Ecuador are expected to deliver Assange into U.S. custody
for criminal prosecution, if Assange doesn’t die at the Ecuadorean Embassy
first.
On November 3rd (which, of course,
preceded the disclosures on November 15th), Julian Assange’s mother, Christine
Ann Hawkins, described in detail what has happened to her son since the time of
Pence’s meeting with Ecuador’s President. She said:
“He is, right now, alone, sick, in
pain, silenced in solitary confinement, cut off from all contact, and being
tortured in the heart of London. … He has been detained nearly eight years,
without trial, without charge. For the past six years, the UK Government has
refused his requests to exit for basic health needs, … [even for] vitamin
D. … As a result, his health has seriously deteriorated. … A slow and cruel
assassination is taking place before our very eyes. … They will stop at
nothing. … When U.S. Vice President Mike Pence recently visited Ecuador, a deal
was done to hand Julian over to the U.S. He said that because the political
cost of expelling Julian from the Embassy was too high, the plan was to break
him down mentally… to such a point that he will break and be forced to
leave. … The extradition warrant is held in secret, four prosecutors but no
defense, and no judge, … without a prima-facie case. [Under the U.S.
system, the result nonetheless can be] indefinite detention without
trial. Julian could be held in Guantanamo Bay and tortured, sentenced to 45
years in a maximum security prison, or face the death penalty,” for “espionage,”
in such secret proceedings.
Her phrase, “because the political
cost of expelling Julian from the Embassy was too high” refers to the worry
that this new President of Ecuador has, of his cooperating with the U.S.
regime’s demands and thereby basically ceding sovereignty to those foreigners
(the rulers of the U.S.), regarding the Ecuadorian citizen, Assange.
This conservative new President of
Ecuador, who has replaced the progressive President who had granted Assange
protection, is obviously doing all that he can to comply with U.S. President
Trump and the U.S. Congress’s demand for Assange either to die soon inside the
Embassy or else be transferred to the U.S. and basically just disappear, at
Guantanamo or elsewhere. Ecuador’s President wants to do this in such a way
that Ecuador’s voters won’t blame him for it, and that he’ll thus be able to be
re-elected. This is the type of deal he apparently has reached with Trump’s
agent, Pence. It’s all secret, but the evidence on this much of what was
secretly agreed-to seems clear. There are likely other details of the agreement
that cannot, as yet, be conclusively inferred from the subsequent events, but
this much can.
Basically, Trump has arranged for
Assange to be eliminated either by illness that’s imposed by his Ecuadorean
agent, or else by Assange’s own suicide resulting from that “torture,” or else
by America’s own criminal-justice system. If this elimination happens inside
the Ecuadorean Embassy in London, then that would be optimal for America’s
President and Congress; but, if it instead happens on U.S. soil, then that
would be optimal for Ecuador’s President. Apparently, America’s President
thinks that his subjects, the American people, will become sufficiently hostile
toward Assange so that even if Assange disappears or is executed inside the
United States, this President will be able to retain his supporters. Trump, of
course, needs his supporters, but this is a gamble that he has now clearly
taken. This much is clear, even though the rest of the secret agreement that
was reached between Pence and Ecuador’s President is not.
Scooter Libby, who had arranged for
the smearing of Valerie Plame who had tried to prevent the illegal and
deceit-based 2003 invasion of Iraq, was sentenced to 30 months but never spent
even a day in prison, and U.S. President
Trump finally went so far as to grant him a complete pardon, on 13 April 2018. (The carefully researched docudrama “Fair Game” covered well the Plame-incident.) Libby had
overseen the career-destruction of a courageous CIA agent, Plame, who had done
the right thing and gotten fired for it; and Trump pardoned Libby, thus
retroactively endorsing the lie-based invasion of Iraq in 2003. By contrast, Trump is
determined to get Julian Assange killed or otherwise eliminated, and even
Democrats in Congress are pushing for him to get that done. The new President
of Ecuador is doing their bidding. Without pressure from the U.S. Government,
Assange would already be a free man. Thus, either Assange will die (be
murdered) soon inside the Embassy, or else he will disappear and be smeared in
the press under U.S. control. And, of course, this is being done in such a way
that no one will be prosecuted for the murder or false-imprisonment. Trump had
promised to “clean the swamp,” but as soon as he was elected, he abandoned that
pretense; and, as President, he has been bipartisan on that matter, to hide the
crimes of the bipartisan U.S. Government, and he is remarkably similar in
policy to his immediate predecessors, whom he had severely criticized while he
was running for the Presidency.
In any event, the destruction of
Assange has clearly been arranged for, at the highest levels of the U.S.
Government, just as the destruction of Jamal Khashoggi was by Saudi Arabia’s
Government; and, just like in Khashoggi’s case, the nation’s ruler controls the
prosecutors and can therefore do whatever he chooses to do that the rest of the
nation’s aristocracy consider to be acceptable.
The assault against truth isn’t only
against Assange, but it is instead also closing down many of the best, most
courageous, independent news sites, such as washingtonsblog. However, in Assange’s case, the penalty for having a
firm commitment to truth has been especially excruciating and will almost
certainly end in his premature death. This is simply the reality. Because of
the system under which we live, a 100% commitment to truth is now a clear
pathway to oblivion. Assange is experiencing this reality to the fullest.
That’s what’s happening here.
—————
Investigative historian Eric Zuesse
is the author, most recently, of They’re Not
Even Close: The Democratic vs. Republican Economic Records, 1910-2010, and
of CHRIST’S
VENTRILOQUISTS: The Event that Created Christianity.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.