By Kathy Kelly
29 November, 2018
On November 28, sixty-three U.S.
Senators voted in favor of holding a floor debate on a resolution calling for
an end to direct U.S. Armed Forces involvement in the Saudi-UAE coalition-led
war on Yemen. Describing the vote as a rebuke to Saudi Arabia and the Trump
Administration, AP reported on Senate dissatisfaction over the administration’s
response to Saudi Arabia’s brutal killing of Jamal Khashoggi last month. Just
before the Senate vote, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo called current
objections to U.S. relations with Saudi Arabia “Capitol Hill caterwauling and
media pile-on.”
The “caterwaul” on Capitol Hill
reflects years of determined effort by grassroots groups to end U.S.
involvement in war on Yemen, fed by mounting international outrage at the last
three years of war that have caused the deaths of an estimated 85,000 Yemeni children
under age five. When children waste away to literally nothing while fourteen
million people endureconflict-driven famine, a hue and cry—yes, a caterwaul
—most certainly should be raised, worldwide.
How might we understand what it would
mean in the United States for fourteen million people in our country to starve?
You would have to combine the populations of New York, Chicago, and Los
Angeles, and imagine these cities empty of all but the painfully and slowly
dying, to get a glimpse into the suffering in Yemen, where one of every two
persons faces starvation. Antiwar activists have persistently challenged
elected representatives to acknowledge and end the horrible consequences of
modern warfare in Yemen where entire neighborhoods have been bombed ,
displacing millions of people; daily aerial attacks have directly targeted
Yemen’s infrastructure, preventing delivery of food, safe water, fuel, and
funds. The war crushes people through aerial bombing and on-the-ground fighting
as well as an insidious economic war.
Yemenis are strangled by import
restrictions and blockades, causing non-payment of government salaries,
inflation, job losses, and declining or disappearing incomes. Even when food is
available, ordinary Yemenis cannot afford it.
Starvation is being used as a weapon
of war—by Saudi Arabia, by the United Arab Emirates, and by the superpower
patrons including the United States that arm and manipulate both countries.
During the thirteen years of economic sanctions against Iraq— those years between
the Gulf War and the devastating U.S.-led “Shock and Awe” war that followed—I
joined U.S. and U.K. activists traveling to Iraq in public defiance of the
economic sanctions.
We aimed to resist U.S.- and
U.K.-driven policies that weakened the Iraqi regime’s opposition more than they
weakened Saddam Hussein. Ostensibly democratic leaders were ready to achieve
their aims by brutally sacrificing children under age five. The children died
first by the hundreds, then by the thousands and eventually by the hundreds of
thousands. Sitting in a Baghdad pediatric ward, I heard a delegation member, a
young nurse from the U.K., begin to absorb the cruelty inflicted on mothers and
children.
“I think I understand,” murmured
Martin Thomas, “It’s a death row for infants.” Children gasped their last
breaths while their parents suffered a pile-up of anguish, wave after wave. We
should remain haunted by those children’s short lives.
Iraq’s children died amid an eerie
and menacing silence on the part of mainstream media and most elected U.S.
officials. No caterwauling was heard on Capitol Hill. But, worldwide, people
began to know that children were paying the price of abysmally failed policies,
and millions of people opposed the 2003 Shock and Awe war. Still the abusive and
greedy policies continue. The U.S. and its allies built up permanent warfare
states to secure consistent exploitation of resources outside their own
territories.
During and after the Arab Spring,
numerous Yemenis resisted dangerously unfair austerity measures that the Gulf
Cooperation Council and the U.S. insisted they must accept. Professor Isa
Blumi, who notes that generations of Yemeni fighters have refused to acquiesce
to foreign invasion and intervention, presents evidence that Saudi Arabia and the
UAE now orchestrate war on Yemen to advance their own financial interests.
In the case of Saudi Arabia, Blumi
states that although Crown Prince Mohammad bin Salman wants to author an IPO
(Initial Public Offering), for the Saudi state oil company, Aramco, no major
investors would likely participate. Investment firms know the Saudis pay cash
for their imports, including billions of dollars’ worth of weaponry, because
they are depleting resources within their own territory. This, in part,
explains the desperate efforts to take over Yemen’s offshore oil reserves and
other strategic assets.
Recent polls indicate that most
Americans don’t favor U.S. war on Yemen. Surely, our security is not enhanced
if the U.S. continues to structure its foreign policy on fear, prejudice,
greed, and overwhelming military force. The movements that pressured the U.S.
Senate to reject current U.S. foreign policy regarding Saudi Arabia and its war
on Yemen will continue raising voices. Collectively, we’ll work toward raising
the lament, pressuring the media and civil society to insist that slaughtering
children will never solve problems.
This article first appeared on the
website of The Progressive magazine.
Kathy Kelly co-coordinates Voices for
Creative Nonviolence www.vcnv.org
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.