Global Research, November
08, 2019
Region: USA
Theme: History
We know all the criticisms.
China’s children are taught only to memorise and not to think or question. They
are rote-learning robots without capacity for original thought. They know only
how to produce high scores but not to apply any knowledge. They have no
creativity, no imagination, no concept of innovation. The classes are too
large; there is no individual attention paid to students. The entire Chinese
educational system is corrupt and failing. But this is all nonsense, yet one
more foolish myth propagated by the Americans. There has never been any
evidence to document such claims which, like so many others, are fabricated
solely on an imaginary moral superiority.
The quality of American
education, as we will see, is far lower than the world has been led to believe,
and the quality in China is in many cases much superior to that in the US.
Americans might care to ask why it is that Chinese elementary or high school
students moving to the US are often promoted by one or two grades. The reason
is that they know so much more than their American counterparts they would
suffer terminal boredom if forced to remain at their prior grade level. If we
refer to the PISA tests, Shanghai’s math scores were 119 above the OECD
average, or the equivalent of nearly three years of schooling, with reading and
science exceeding the OECD average by about 1.5 years of schooling. And in some
cases, the American students were behind the OECD average by approximately the
same number of years as the Chinese were ahead.
The myth persists that the
US has always led the world in quality of education, but this is nothing more
than branding propaganda and part of the indoctrination process of American
moral superiority that is wholly unsupported by facts. Consider this quote from
an American education expert:
“The US has never been first
in the world, nor even near the top, on any international tests. Consistently
over the past half century, American students have typically scored near the
median at best, but most often being in the bottom quartile. The historical
record indicates that American elementary students are only average at best,
their performance degrading year by year until high school seniors perform last
in almost all international tests. The International Science Studies that began
in high schools in the late 1960s and early 1970s found that 14-year-olds were
below average and seniors scored last of all countries. In the International
Mathematics tests that began in the 1960s, American high school seniors scored
last of all nations. In the 1982 International Mathematics Study, high school
seniors placed at the bottom on almost every test. In terms of the PISA tests,
American students – placing last – are simply following the pattern that has
been consistent for the past 50 years or more.”
Recent tests in the New York
area show that less than half of all students are proficient in English and
Math, and in some areas the number is as low as 13%. This is true in most of
the country, literacy being marginal in most American secondary schools. In an
article published in the San Jose Mercury in 2001, it was documented that 75%
of California high school seniors could not read well enough to pass their exit
exams.
A quote from one news
report:
“In October of 2013 a new
global report issued by the OECD found that Americans ranked well below the
worldwide average in just about every measure of skill. In math, reading, and
technology-driven problem-solving, the United States performed worse than
nearly every other country… The US would have looked even worse if China had
been included in this study. In basic literacy – the ability to understand and
use basic written text – 80% of Americans reached only a level 2 out of 5. And
in math and numerical proficiency, using numbers in daily life, they are worse
… and 10% scored below level 1. Technological literacy and ability were worse
too. In problem-solving in a technological environment and the use of
“cognitive skills required to solve problems”, the Americans were at the
bottom.”
And that bottom is in math,
vocabulary, language usage and technology, with Chinese students far surpassing
the Americans even when using a language that is not their own.
In early 2014 the Washington
Times reported that new studies and the results of the recent SAT tests
demonstrate conclusively that the vast majority of America’s 2012 high school
graduates aren’t ready for college, and SAT scores have plummeted to their
lowest level in more than 40 years. The results of the exams, released by the
College Board, revealed that only about 39% of students planning to attend
university are in any way prepared for the world of higher education. More than
60% displayed functional illiteracy by failing the reading portion of the test,
with only a slightly better result on math and writing, which means most US
university students will achieve C or D grades at best, and that a great many
will either fail or be falsely graduated without merit or knowledge. And the
dropout rates are fierce. In Washington DC, the nation’s capital, almost 70% of
college students fail to graduate.
Knowledge of English
We’re dealing with the
English language, and listening to a senior American educator, a Ph.D. from
Harvard, explaining why only 39% of all students who took the SAT college
admissions test scored well enough to be deemed ready for college. In her
little media sound-byte, she said this fact showed American educators where
they needed to “hone in”.
The correct expression is
“to home in on”, as with a homing device, to focus on or bring us to the
correct place, in fact to take us home. To “hone” is to sharpen, as to hone a
blade, but for Americans who don’t – or can’t – read, the sound is similar and
sloppy carelessness accounts for the rest. Critics pounced on this, but she and
other ‘educators’ defended such a foolish error by claiming that language is
alive and fluid, and it changes. To make matters worse, another shining light,
this one an education expert from Duke University, informed us that our
criticisms of poor-quality education (and educators) would likely “snuff out
democracy”.
In spite of all the branding
propaganda and rhetoric, the decreasing quality of American education is
well-known in the West. It is not a secret that for many decades the US has
been “dumbing-down” its education at all levels, consistently reducing
government funding to result in fewer teachers, larger classrooms, poorer
facilities, lower salaries and teacher quality, and steadily decreasing
learning. One need only do a quick Internet search to find hundreds of studies
and alarmed reports of the greatly-deteriorated quality of American education.
As John Kozy noted,
“In fact, piles of evidence
reveal that Americans are getting dumber. People who have graduated from high
school since the pocket calculator was invented can’t calculate in their heads,
not even simple addition, subtraction, and multiplication. Many people addicted
to the Internet have difficulty reading anything more complicated than a
tweet”.
The propaganda machine
focuses heavily on the mythical superiority of the American education system,
but Americans are no longer taught the critical thinking skills needed to see
through the lies presented to them. One author pointed out that American public
schooling grinds away at children until they graduate with little creativity or
curiosity, stating further that “Such people will never be informed citizens,
and most could care less”. All of this has been heavily researched and
documented by John Gatto, who was nominated as Teacher of the Year for New York
State and New York City, and who has since left teaching, claiming he was no
longer willing to harm children by teaching them in the US public school
system.
In 2013, Jeff Schweitzer
wrote an article in the UK Guardian titled ‘God created gravity’, in which he
deplored the sad state of American education, to quite an extent blaming
religion for the lack of intelligent focus, with subjects like science still in
the 17th century in US schools. He said that while the rest of the world is
becoming educated, Americans spend their time discussing how exceptional and
awesome they are, with the result that Americans are number one only in
delusion. “Steeped in this wasteland of scientific illiteracy we march ever
further toward a theocracy … twisting history to indoctrinate our children with
stories about god and gravity”, with educational debates, like all others based
on faith rather than logic. He wrote that today the only way for Americans to
support any position they hold is to simply assert their supremacy as loudly as
possible, reduced to childlike tantrums of “I’m right, you’re wrong, I win.”
Because American schools do
not demand critical thinking and problem-solving from students starting at a
young age, the students are lost in university classrooms when they are years
behind and struggling with the basics of reading and understanding. Many US
educators complain that fewer than one-quarter of their students have any
proficiency at all in basic skills like math and reading comprehension, that
they are never taught original ideas or methods of learning that will prepare
them for higher education. One educator claimed, “My former teachers simply did
not push me to think past a basic level, to apply concepts, to move beyond
memorizing facts and figures.” And of course the students feel the pressure
acutely. One first-year university student said, “I basically thought I was
stupid. I just felt like, What’s wrong with me? Maybe I’m not meant to be
here.” Another said, “You can’t make it in college by yourself. You just need
all the help you can get.” One student who felt blessed by having a good
teacher in her final year in high school said, “I feel like it was too late. It
just wasn’t enough to have that kind of teacher for one year.”
And it isn’t only the
students who are in this position. The New York Post ran an interesting article
titled, “US adults are dumber than the average human”, which stated in part,
“It’s long been known that America’s school kids haven’t measured well compared
with international peers. Now, there’s a new twist: Adults don’t either. In
math, reading and problem-solving using technology – all skills considered
critical for global competitiveness and economic strength – American adults
scored below the international average on a global test.” The studies also
found that it was much more difficult on average to overcome the lack of
knowledge, literacy and other barriers in the United States, than in other
nations. The article continued, “It’s not just the kids who require more and
more preparation to get access to the economy, it’s more and more the adults
don’t have the skills to stay in it. Americans scored toward the bottom in the
category of problem solving in a technology rich environment, even in skills
such as using a mouse”, creating a kind of “underclass – a large group of
people who are basically unemployable”. And again, “A quarter of all Americans
never become proficient in math. In Shanghai and Korea, the comparable figure
is about 6%. Some 7% of US students reached the top two scientific performance
levels, compared with an amazing 27% in Shanghai.”
Rick Shenkman wrote an
interesting and enlightening article titled ‘Just How Stupid Are We?’, in which
he wrote “Americans generally do not seem to absorb what it is that they are
reading and hearing and watching. Americans cannot even name the leaders of
their own government. The error can be traced to our mistaking unprecedented
access to information with the actual consumption of it.” He said that in the
postwar period, social scientists began to systematically measure what
Americans actually knew, and even back then the results of their displayed
ignorance were devastating. He further claimed that surveys showed Americans’
level of ignorance remaining constant over time, and that by some measures
“Americans are dumber today than their parents of a generation ago. Young
people … know less today than young people forty years ago.”
The situation is so bad that
in 2003, when the Strategic Task Force on Education investigated Americans’
knowledge of world affairs, they concluded that
“Americans’ ignorance … is
so great as to constitute a threat to national security.”
But according to the NYT’s
resident jack-of-all-trades Paul Krugman, if you had to “express the greatness
of the United States in one word, that word would be ‘education’.”
Other more knowledgeable and
competent people disagree with Krugman. Donald Kagan, a former president of
Yale University gave a final speech in 2013 in which he said that American
universities were failing their students, that the curricula were inappropriate
and were “unfocused and scattered”, the campuses “a kind of cultural void, with
an ignorance of the past”, and that “faculty with atypical views” were rare.
Perhaps most importantly, Kagan said,
“At the university, there
must be intellectual variety. If you don’t have [that], it’s not only that you
are deprived of knowing some of the things you might know. It’s that you are
deprived of testing the things that you do know or do think you know or believe
in, so that your knowledge is superficial.”
The man was precisely
correct in this last statement, reflecting one of the hazards today of being an
American, the programmed and propagandised uniformity of thought that deprives
Americans of any way to test the validity of their (mostly) foolish beliefs.
Such regimented and incessant propaganda provides a uniform reinforcement of
ideology, creating impenetrable boundaries of the mind. The simple-minded
adherence to a single ideology narrows one’s views and cripples the ability to
think clearly or critically. As one author wrote, “a closely adhered-to
ideology becomes a mental locality with limits and borders just as real as
those of geography. In fact, if we consider (American) nationalism a pervasive
modern ideology, there is a direct connection between the boundaries induced in
the mind and those on the ground.”
Here is one example of many,
of the quality of education in the US adult population:
For background, the Boston
school system had for many years grappled with the problem of how to assign
students to Boston’s public schools that could both let children attend one of
the few good schools in the system while also finding one close to their homes.
They also wanted to ensure that students from poor neighborhoods had the same
chance of attending good schools as those from more affluent neighborhoods. The
school system was divided into zones where many students were bused far from
home but still attended the lower-quality schools. A newly-appointed 27-member
committee tried yet again to find a solution but after months of examination
and debate became hopelessly entangled in what were largely irrelevancies, and
again could find no solution. But a 24-year old Chinese student named Peng Shi
who was in a Ph.D. program at MIT and who was looking for a thesis topic,
attended the meetings, asked a few questions and gave them the obvious solution
of eliminating their school zones and applying a different model for selection.
After some study, the committee voted overwhelmingly to adopt Shi’s model, calling
it “a breakthrough moment” for Boston’s school system.
According to an NYT article
reporting on the event: “That it took a dispassionate outsider with … no
political agenda to formulate the model is a measure of the complexities facing
urban school districts today”, but that is a baldly dishonest statement.
Yes, it took a
‘dispassionate outsider with no political agenda’ to solve the problem, but the
problem was not “a measure of the complexities facing American school
districts” but one more indication that creativity, independent thinking,
problem-solving and all the other good words do not in fact exist in the US
educational system.
For 24-year old Shi, if you
applied a bit of rational thinking, the solution was obvious. However, it
wasn’t obvious to the 27 adult American “educators” who lead the world in
innovation and critical thinking, but instead to a 24-year old Chinese kid, a
rote-learning robot whose educational system taught him only to memorise and
not to think, who knew only how to produce high scores but not to apply any
knowledge, someone with no creativity and no imagination.
Karl Weiss wrote an
excellent and perceptive article that was published in Germany’s Berliner
Umschau in October of 2009; I will quote some of his observations here. He
began with the decrepit American educational system, stating “.. the education
system in America is unlike that of almost any other industrialized country.
Free education is available only at primary and secondary levels; beyond that,
community and technical colleges and universities are so expensive that
children in lower socioeconomic classes have little chance of attending unless
they are “gifted” and get scholarships. The education provided by the public
school system is often so inferior that graduates who can’t afford better
schooling have little chance of ever getting the knowledge and skills necessary
to lead fulfilling lives. Instead, the focus is on producing nationalistic
dimwits who know nothing but their own country.” He went on to say that one
result is a deeply divided society with the capitalists and bankers on one side
and the uneducated and lower class on the other, resulting in what he called “a
society of force so shot through with violence that any other value has little
or no meaning”, and with everything rooted in the Christianity-based black and
white dog-eat-dog competition that creates only winners and losers. Weiss’
allegation of “nationalistic dimwits” is not only accurate for the US
educational system, but the process is universal throughout the nation.
Educational materials in the US are largely propaganda tools, intended not to
educate but to indoctrinate.
In the wonderfully
disingenuous but disturbing manner of propagandising in which Americans excel,
one educational website made the following claim:
“While lawyers, doctors, and
teachers typically complete additional schoolwork, computer programmers,
nurses, and automotive technicians may be qualified with only one or two years
of study”.
Doctors “typically” complete
“additional schoolwork”? That sounds like some, but not all, medical students
doing a bit of extra homework at the Grade Three level, but doctors in most
countries need an undergrad degree plus an additional four years of grueling
medical training to become an M.D., and yet this is being equated with an auto
mechanic who may be qualified with only one year of study. This
re-categorisation may appear trivial to the casual reader, but this
anti-intellectual linguistic magic is reprogramming Americans with a much-denigrated
appreciation of a university education. Now, an American hairdresser and
manicurist is trained to the same level of competence as a gynecologist –
except for the bit of “additional schoolwork”.
The amount of mythological
propaganda and marketing surrounding American education is stunning. Shailendra
Raj Mehta, a visiting professor at Duke University, wrote one of the most
nonsensical articles I have seen in years, titled The secret of Harvard’s
Success, in which he wrote “No country dominates any industry as much as the
United States dominates higher education”. According to him, in a ranking of
world universities, 17 of the world’s 20 best universities are American, with
Harvard topping the list by a substantial margin, a feat he attributes to
“America’s innovative governance model for higher education”. I have no idea
what that would be, but it can’t be good. As I’ve already detailed elsewhere,
Harvard was established by the Puritans as a religious training camp to produce
missionaries for their heresies, not to “educate” anybody. And, as with all
rankings everywhere, the Americans choose the game, set all the parameters, lay
down the rules, decide the scoring system, then win the game. American
universities are not ranked so highly because they are the best; it’s because
the Americans determined the ranking rules so they would come out on top.
In fact, in a recent, and
more intelligent and less-biased examination of higher education systems, China
ranked ninth, six places above the US. Universitas 21, a group of 27
research-intensive universities from around the world, created an international
ranking system of educational quality based on national purchasing power. A
leading Universitas researcher said that despite a relatively low per capita
income, China had made a “phenomenal” investment in its top universities,
resulting in Chinese universities now being “serious players” in research and
other fields.
Here is an excerpt written
by Sarah Brown, taken from Canada’s Globe and Mail, in response to an NYT article
about Harvard students always receiving A grades:
“Having attended both
Harvard and the University of Toronto, I can state that there are two
differences between the schools: Harvard is much more difficult to get into,
whereas the University of Toronto is much more difficult to get out of – with a
degree and decent grades, that is. At Harvard, undergraduates have to take only
four full-time courses per year to earn a degree, and they have a longer school
year in which to prepare for their exams. At U of T, five full-time courses
must be taken, and the school year is much more condensed. The atmosphere at
Harvard is quite “country-clubish” and leisurely, while at U of T it is a
downright pressure-cooker. At U of T there is an unwritten policy that 20 per
cent of the students in every class will receive a failing grade. At Harvard,
most students receive a minimum of A- grades. In fact, to receive anything less
than a B, one would have to miss exams and not hand in assignments. As far as
getting into Harvard goes, the most significant factor is whether or not you
are a so-called “legacy,” meaning that if your father, mother, or sibling went
to Harvard before you, you can still get in, as hundreds do, with mediocre high
school grades. I’m not surprised that current Harvard students feel that they
deserve A’s for their $100,000 investment; if they were forced to compete with
students at the U of T, many would receive only C’s at best.” And many would
fail.
Dumber Than the Average
Human
When I was a university
student, there were Americans at my school who had obtained B.A. degrees from
UCLA with majors in – and I am not kidding – basket-weaving and ceramics. In
America, that’s called an education. Basket-weaving. That’s about the same being
granted a Master’s degree if you can learn to knit a sweater. At around the
same time, a US polling firm did a nation-wide study and discovered, among
other things, that a full 75% of Americans could not find their own country on
a map of the world. Similar studies have been repeated many times since then,
with essentially the same results among adults and students at all levels
including university: about 75% of Americans couldn’t find either their country
or Canada. One of the most famous references to this astonishing level of
American ignorance occurred on US national television during a Miss Teen USA
pageant when one of the finalists, Miss South Carolina, Caitlin Upton, was
asked why most Americans couldn’t find their country on a world map. Here is
her answer, which was posted on YouTube and received more than 40 million
views: (You can still find it. It’s worth seeing.)
“I personally believe that
US Americans are unable to do so because, uh, some people out there in our
nation don’t have maps and, uh, I believe that our, uh, education like such as,
uh, South Africa and, uh, the Iraq, everywhere like such as, and, I believe
that they should, our education over here in the US should help the US, uh, or,
uh, should help South Africa and should help the Iraq and the Asian countries,
so we will be able to build up our future for our children.”
If that doesn’t tell you
what you need to know about the quality of American education, I don’t know
what would. It isn’t only the ignorance, but the obvious functional illiteracy
of such a person, that is so stunning.
The American media flood the
nation and the world with the most astonishing propaganda and fabricated
fairy-tales about the quality of the nation’s education. The US used to boast
that it had the highest percentage of population with university degrees. I
don’t know if that claim was ever true, but it eventually became false so the
Americans moved the goalposts. Now, in all the statistics, including those by
the US government itself, anyone with any kind of accreditation above High
School (including even a 1-year hairdressing diploma – which they call an
“associate degree”) is listed as a college graduate.
Similarly, the US claims the
highest level of literacy in the world – 99%. Truly enviable. But then, reading
the small print at the end of a recent highly-regarded “definitive study”
purporting to document American educational supremacy, what do we find? Just as
with its economic statistics and every other comparison the US produces, we
discover manipulated and falsified data. In these so-called studies produced by
the US government and its educational institutions, the Americans simply
misrepresented the facts so they could place themselves at the top of the list.
In the case of functional literacy, the US position is this:
“For highly developed or
high income countries where literacy statistics were not collected, a rate of
99% was assumed.”
We might legitimately ask
why the Americans didn’t bother to collect statistics. The reason is that in
all studies, researchers have found the rate of functional illiteracy in the US
is almost 25% of the total population, with the illiteracy rate for adults in
many American cities like Detroit having been documented at almost 50%, a very
long way from the fictional 99% literacy ‘assumed’, and in many other major
cities like New York large swathes of the population read below a grade three
level and have no math or other skills. The highly-regarded National Adult
Literacy Survey found a total of almost 25%, or about 50 million of the 200
million American adults functioning at the lowest literacy level. In an article
published in the San Jose Mercury in 2001, it was documented that 75% of
California high school seniors could not read well enough to pass their exit
exams. In basic literacy – the ability to understand and use basic written text
– 80% of Americans reached only a level 2 out of 5. It is so bad that 75% of
the Fortune 500 companies have to provide some level of remedial training for
their workers – a large number of whom are college graduates.
Countless books and academic
studies have been produced on the severe literacy problem in America, but the
media ignore these facts and continue, like Paul Krugman, to feed the world the
foolish utopian claim that the US is a world leader in education when nothing
could be farther from the truth. More than 25% of Americans believe the sun
revolves around the earth, but one US columnist wrote that this wasn’t really a
bad thing. He claimed, “Firstly, the great majority of humans throughout
history have believed this. Secondly, it’s not a problem that impinges on the
daily life of anyone. We should pick co-ordinates for convenience, not dogma.”
Canada has a popular TV
personality named Rick Mercer, who takes a camera crew into the US on a crusade
to satirise the true educational level of Americans. One of his trademark
programs was called Talking to Americans, in which he would conduct random
interviews with average Americans and tell them outrageous stories about Canada
which they would inevitably accept as true. In one of his shows, Mercer asked
Americans how many sides a triangle had: One victim of American education said,
“None. There are no sides in a triangle.” Another said “Four.” He asked them if
the movie “Star Wars” were based on a true story; many Americans answered in
the affirmative. It isn’t only Canadians who mock American ignorance and lack
of education. The US late-night talk shows often do this kind of thing,
ridiculing the fabled ignorance of their own citizens, claiming that they need
to speak to only ten or at most twenty Americans to find 5 stupid ones who know
nothing – 25%. This is so well-known that in Europe, ‘American’ equals
‘Ignorant’, the two adjectives considered equivalent and synonymous.
Ron Unz wrote an excellent
and informative article in The American Conservative titled The Myth of
American Meritocracy, in which he detailed issues with admission to top US
universities, quoting other studies as well, all of which suggest that various
preferences and biases, including the role of cash in this process, with most
universities, including Harvard, having a ‘cash price’ of admission, meaning
that a substantial donation will obtain admittance even for a dim-witted
student with no particular ability.
He wrote that the notion of
a wealthy family buying their son his entrance into the Grandes Ecoles of
France or the top Japanese universities would be an absurdity.” He mentioned
China as well, confirming that China’s gaokao is strictly based on merit and has
never been corrupted by favoritism, and has been kept “remarkably clean for
1300 years”. He confirmed what many of us already know, that this uncorrupted
system may be one reason so many wealthy Chinese send their “dim and lazy”
offspring to study in the West. In his words, “enrolling them at a third-rate
Chinese university would be a tremendous humiliation, while our own corrupt
admissions practices get them an easy spot at Harvard or Stanford, sitting side
by side with the children of Bill Clinton, Al Gore, and George W. Bush.” One of
his final comments was that the admissions process at top American universities
operates under the principle of “Ideology and Diversity tempered by
Corruption”, not what many Chinese have been led to expect from the propaganda
machine.
It should be abundantly
obvious that there is no way to reconcile these testimonials and experiences,
and countless thousands similar, with claims that the US ‘dominates higher
education’, at least not in any positive way. And so, with appropriate
apologies to Paul Krugman, for those of you who are desperate to “express the
greatness of America in one word”, that word would be “bull****”, not
education.
*
Note to readers: please
click the share buttons above or below. Forward this article to your email
lists. Crosspost on your blog site, internet forums. etc.
Larry Romanoff is a frequent contributor to Global Research.
You may contact him at 2186604556@qq.com.
The original source of this
article is Global Research
Copyright © Larry
Romanoff, Global
Research, 2019
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.