by Eric
Zuesse
December
23, 2019
Huffington Post headlined on December 21st “I Left Increasingly Right-Wing
Britain And Now I Don’t Know If I Will Ever Return Home”, but the young woman who wrote it seems to have had
no idea of the deep international forces that — as she sadly noted — are
driving ever-larger numbers of young Brits, like herself, to relocate to
continental Europe. This is part of a long war against Russia that started in
her own UK, then took over in the United States on 26 July 1945, and seems likely to intensify greatly in the future,
and to propel UK itself even further into America’s anti-Russian
orbit, while Europe will ultimately unify increasingly with the rest of the
EurAsian continent — including with both Russia and China.
The U.S. Government has actually been behind all of this reorganization
of the international political map (as will be documented here in the links to
the present article).
The U.S. Government, by means of its coups, overthrew democratically
elected progressive governments and replaced them with brutal fascist
dictatorships in Thailand 1948, Iran 1953, Chile 1973, Honduras 2009, and Ukraine 2014, just to mention a few U.S.-hired coups; and, now —
with the December 12th Tory landslide and resultant inevitability of Brexit —
the UK (America’s former colonizer) will itself become just another American
colony. Here is how all of this is happening:
On December 14th, CNBC headlined “US isn’t weaponizing the dollar;
sanctions are the alternative to war, Mnuchin says” and reported enormously important news,
regarding the strategy that the U.S. Government has increasingly been using
ever since, in 2012, it imposed (on fraudulent grounds) the Magnitsky Act sanctions against Russia, and
subsequently imposed the many other sanctions regimens used against nations
that are either allied with or merely friendly toward Russia. That article also
discussed the international alliances which will be involved in a military
World War III if this preliminary stage of global warfare (the sanctions-phase)
won’t produce the capitulation of Russia and of China, but instead an outright
military war becomes resorted-to.
That CNBC article mentioned the U.S. Government is even fighting against
some of America’s own allies in order to maintain the dollar as the global
reserve currency: “Earlier this year, France, Germany and the U.K. set up the
Instrument in Support of Trade Exchanges (INSTEX), which uses euros to bypass
U.S. sanctions on Iran. While it’s not shown itself to be economically
effective, it’s a sign that even allies are seeking dollar alternatives to
rebel against U.S. policies they oppose.” Thus, even U.S.-friendly governments
are now straining against the U.S. leash, to become free, no longer mere
vassals. However, the Tory electoral victory in UK on December 12th assured
that Britain will become more, not less, dependent upon the U.S. during coming
years. So, Britain is being propelled away from the EU, and toward America, but
Europe could actually end up on the anti-U.S. side.
That article interviewed the U.S. Trump Administration, through U.S.
Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin, who said that the U.S. is employing
sanctions — and especially is employing secondary sanctions (sanctions
penalizing any country that does trade with a country the U.S. sanctions) — as
a less costly way than military invasions (of the targeted country), in order
to conquer the entire world, including especially Russia and China. Mnuchin’s
CNBC interviewer there volunteered to say (at 2:00 in the video-interview
there) “Just over the last few days, we
didn’t just get a U.S.-China Phase One, we also got a resounding victory for
the Tories in the United Kingdom”, and both parts of that cryptic statement will be
explained here, because both parts are geostrategically crucial.
Russia’s President Vladimir Putin is, of course, aware of the U.S.
regime’s successes in their long-term plans to win control over the country he
leads, and he has been struggling to block these plans. On December 20th,
Russia’s RT bannered “Russia & Ukraine sign ‘protocol
of agreement’ for gas transit to Europe – Gazprom”, and reported that “After months of tense
negotiations and years of legal battles, Moscow and Kiev have made an agreement
on extension to the current gas transit agreement, which expires on December
31.” Those “years of legal battles” go all the way back to America’s
successful coup in February 2014 that ousted an
internationally neutralist and democratically elected Ukrainian Government and installed a rabidly anti-Russian racist-fascist
regime in Ukraine,
which refused to pay its bills (then around $3 billion) for gas from Russia.
Ukraine also was the main route of pipelines supplying Russia’s gas into the
European Union. U.S. President Barack Obama’s 2014 capture for the U.S., of Ukraine — the nation having the longest European border
with Russia, 1,625 miles — constituted a major coup for U.S. foreign policy, a
coup which is equivalent to if Russia were to overthrow the democratically
elected Government of Mexico or Canada and take control over that border as a
potential location to place its missiles. Obama’s successor Trump is following
through on Obama’s successful anti-Russian policy regarding Ukraine, and Trump
is even bolder than Obama in telling Europeans to buy costly
trans-Atlantic-shipped U.S. Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) in preference to the
far cheaper pipelined gas from Russia. Of course, if European nations were to
do that, their increased energy-costs would weaken their economies so much that
the U.S. would be unquestionably the king of the world.
On December 21st, RT headlined “Big bully at work: Firm laying Nord
Stream 2 pipeline halts all ‘activities’ faced with ‘crushing sanctions’ by US” and reported that the U.S. Congress and the
Trump Administration are forcing EU-based corporations to abandon their
participations in the completion of the Russia-EU Nordstream II gas pipeline or
else lose all their business with the U.S., by their facing what are called
“secondary sanctions” against them, the sanctions that are in addition to the
direct sanctions the U.S. already has in place against Russia. Secondary
sanctions are punishments against any country which violates the trading-bans
that are in the primary sanctions, which are against the targeted country (in
this case, Russia). Trump and the U.S. Congress (with the support of overwhelming majorities in both houses) have made clear to the EU either to choose the U.S.
and UK, or else to choose Russia and China, as being their main
trading-partners. The U.S. already has the pro-jihadist governments in the
Middle East — Saudi Arabia, Qatar, UAE, Kuwait, Israel, etc. (all of them
against Iran) — and is now especially trying to cement the loyalty of EU
nations. Under Trump, America is willing even to employ the first stage of
war, the
sanctions stage,
against the EU, in order to compel this loyalty to the owners of U.S.-based
international corporations.
Thus, two global trading-blocs are in the process of being formed by
Trump (with the near-100-% backing of both Parties —
Democrats and Republicans — in Congress), one centered around the U.S., and the
other centered around Russia and the countries that have friendly relations
with Russia, including China, Iran, and Venezuela. Three of America’s core
allies are UK, Israel, and the royal Saud family who own Saudi Arabia.
The landslide victory, on 12 December 2019, of UK’s
libertarian/neoliberal Conservative Party, defeating the post-Tony-Blair,
progressive (or democratic socialist), Labour Party, means not only that UK’s
exit from the European Union is now inevitable, but that there will soon be
massive privatization of public services — such as health, education, and
welfare — in UK (thus making it more American); and that therefore U.S.
international corporations will increasingly dominate UK, which will become, in
effect, America’s 51st state (like Israel already is) and a growing market for
U.S. brands. Per-capita healthcare costs will thus likely soar in UK to around
the U.S. level (where healthcare already is a vastly overpriced bloated
libertarian mess and the worst among industrialized countries), which is, in fact, over twice as costly as in today’s
socialized-healthcare UK. Healthcare is a necessity, not a luxury, and so anyone in UK who can
afford healthcare will increasingly need to pay the resulting sharply
increasing costs, but everyone else will simply get sicker and die younger;
life-expectancy there will thus decline, in the new, U.S.-dominated, UK
(as is already starting to happen in the
U.S. itself).
The idea that not socializing a necessity is good instead of bad is stupid;
there is already ample historical evidence that that idea is false and creates
massive unnecessary suffering, but that’s what UK’s voters opted for.
The Jeremy-Corbyn Labour Party was committed to protecting and
improving social services and to allowing another vote on Brexit, but UK’s voters rejected that platform in a
landslide on December 12th. The UK’s only future now is with U.S.-based
international corporations.
Here is what UK’s elections were actually all about — not only Brexit,
but also radical libertarianism/neoliberalism and an exclusive alliance with a
similarly ideological
(libertarian-neoliberal-fascist-neoconservative-imperialist) U.S.:
——
“Jeremy Corbyn reveals dossier ‘proving NHS up for
sale’”
Jeremy Corbyn reveals 451-page unredacted document ‘proving NHS up for
sale’ – video
27 November 2019, Frances Perraudin
Labour has obtained official documents showing that the US is demanding
that the NHS will be “on the table” in talks on a post-Brexit trade deal,
Jeremy Corbyn has said.
The Labour leader said the uncensored papers gave the lie to Boris
Johnson’s claims that the NHS would not be part of any trade talks, and
revealed that the US wanted “total market access” after the UK leaves the EU.
“The uncensored documents leave Boris Johnson’s denials in absolute
tatters,” he said at a news conference in London. “We have now got evidence
that under Boris Johnson the NHS is on the table and will be up for sale. He
tried to cover it up in a secret agenda and today it has been exposed.”
Corbyn said the 451 pages of documents covered six rounds of talks from
July 2017 to “just a few months ago”. He said the meetings took place in
Washington and London. “We are talking here about secret talks for a deal with
Donald Trump after Brexit,” he said.
Responding to the Labour claims, the Conservatives said the documents
had already been online for two months and were simply readouts from meetings
of the UK-US trade and investment working group. The Tories accused Labour of
using the documents to try to divert attention from the issue of antisemitism
in its ranks.
On medicine pricing, Corbyn said discussions had already been concluded
between the two sides on lengthening patents. “Longer patents can only mean one
thing: more expensive drugs. Lives will be put at risk as a result of this,” he
said.
He used the example of Humira, used to treat Crohn’s disease and
rheumatoid arthritis. “It costs our NHS £1,409 a packet. In the US, the same
packet costs £8,115. Get the difference: £1,409 in our NHS, £8,115 in the USA,”
Corbyn said. “One of the reasons for US drug prices being on average 250% of
those here is a patent regime rigged for the big pharmaceutical companies.”
He added: “Let’s be frank, the US is not going to negotiate to sell its
own medicines for less.”
Labour is battling to bring the focus back on to safer ground after
Corbyn’s handling of antisemitism came under renewed criticism on Tuesday. [He
was called an “anti-Semite” for criticizing
apartheid Israel;
and U.S. and UK ‘news’-media equate that with anti-Semitism.]
Corbyn avoided apologising to Jewish communities in a TV interview after
the chief rabbi, Ephraim Mirvis, alleged he had let the poison of antisemitism
take root in the party.
Corbyn had previously highlighted heavily redacted documents obtained by
Labour campaigners relating to private meetings between UK and US officials
discussing health being included in a trade deal. It is understood the party
obtained unredacted versions in the last couple of days.
Corbyn said the documents revealed that the UK and US were closer to a
deal than hoped. “[Officials] are ready to ‘exchange text’, which is
trade-negotiator-speak for it being at a very advanced stage,” he said. “And
they say they are ready to, I quote, ‘really take significant further steps’.”
Corbyn said the report from the third meeting said “everything is
included [in trade talks] unless something is specifically excluded” and that
the US wanted “total market access” as the “baseline assumption of the trade
negotiations”.
He said officials had discussed a system to give corporations the power
to sue the UK. “This is not only a plot against our NHS,” said Corbyn. “It is a
plot against the whole country.”
He pointed to a passage in the documents that suggested the US would
prefer a no-deal Brexit. “There would be all to play for in a no-deal situation
but UK commitment to the customs union and single market would make a US-UK
[free trade agreement] a non-starter,” it reads.
The Conservatives said it was simply fact that it would not be possible
to strike a free-trade deal with the US if the UK remained in the single market
and customs union.
The international trade secretary, Liz Truss, said: “Jeremy Corbyn is
getting desperate and is out-and-out lying to the public about what these
documents contain.”
She said it was Corbyn’s belief in “conspiracy theories” that had led
him to fail to crack down on antisemitism in his party, pointing to reports
that he had called on “western governments” to confront “the Zionist lobby” in
a piece written for the Morning Star in 2011.
“People should not believe a word that he says, this stunt is simply a
smokescreen for the fact that he has no plan for Brexit and that he has been
forced to admit that he wants to increase taxes for millions of families,” she
said.
“As we have consistently made clear, the NHS will not be on the table in
any future trade deal and the price that the NHS pays for drugs will not be on
the table. This sort of conspiracy theory fuelled nonsense is not befitting of
the leader of a major political party.”
Labour’s manifesto includes a pledge to increase NHS funding by an
average of 4.3% every year of the next parliament, which is more generous than
Conservative and Liberal Democrat proposals.
The party has also promised to “end and reverse privatisation in the NHS
in the next parliament”, as well as offering free annual NHS dental checkups
and a new national care service to tackle the social care crisis.
——
Here is the main prior history behind that Tory victory:
Back in 1902, the aristocrat Cecil Rhodes, an enormously successful
protégé of the European Rothschild family, established The Rhodes Trust, which was based entirely upon Rhodes’s viewpoint,
not on that of his Rothschild business-sponsors and investors. Rhodes’s chief
agent was W.T. Stead, and page 209 of Sir Frederick Whyte, Life of W.T.
Stead, v. II, Ch. 25, stated that “Rothschild would not like that,
Stead objected laughingly. ‘When he reads the will and finds that I am in it
also, there will be ructions!’ ‘Well,’ said Rhodes, ‘I don’t mind. I shall be
gone!” (Unfortunately,
only v. I can be directly downloaded online, and it is here. However, v. II can sometimes be
found available second-hand online.)
Although his will, which established the Trust, said (p. 39 here) that “No student shall be qualified or disqualified
for election to a Scholarship on account of his race or religious opinions,”
Rhodes was widely considered to be racist; and, for example, he wrote in 1877,
“I contend that we are the first race in the world, and that the more of the
world we inhabit the better it is for the human race. I contend that every acre
added to our territory means the birth of more of the English race who
otherwise would not be brought into existence. Added to this, the absorption of
the greater portion of the world under our rule simply means the end of all
wars.” That statement is stunning to any person who is sensitive to a person’s
logically contradicting him-or-her self; it is shocking logical stupidity.
Rhodes simply refused to recognize that imperialism means taking over other
countries and therefore means creating wars — the exact opposite of
“the end of all wars.” Though Rhodes was a brilliant strategist in business, he
was a fool regarding his philosophy, because his moralisms always gave way to
his sheer psychopathic greed in actual practise. He continued there by saying
that his main goals were “The
furtherance of the British Empire, for the bringing of the whole uncivilised
world under British rule, for the recovery of the United States, for the making
the Anglo-Saxon race but one Empire.” And, from the very start of the Rhodes
scholarship program, after its first selectees in 1903, the program
became, from 1907 onward, almost entirely selectees from the U.S. This reflected not only Rhodes’s determination
to bring the U.S. back into the British Empire, but also the very realistic
recognition that, going forward into the 20th Century and beyond, the U.S. was
going to dominate the world. Therefore, the Rhodes program was designed for
UK’s Government and aristocracy to control U.S.’s Government and press. This
has been an effort by Britain to reverse the U.S. Revolution, which had been
waged against not only Britain but its entire aristocracy, and even against any
aristocracy from ever forming in the U.S. (Of course, today’s America is the opposite of their intentions.)
The 12 December 2019 UK elections mean that UK has instead become a
vassal of America’s aristocracy. This evil outcome is a humiliation of Cecil
Rhodes’s evil dream — it’s a reversal of the master-slave relationship that was
championed by Rhodes. He had wanted America to again be ruled by Britain; but,
now, instead, Britain will be ruled by America (i.e., by the U.S. aristocracy).
——
Anyone who doubts the authenticity of the history behind the present
article should consult the brilliantly written and superbly documented
blog-post titled “The Round Table”, which is undated and comes from a “Mike McClaughry”
and which was actually first posted on “January 23, 2015”. (That author might be this Scientologist; but, regardless, the sources to which his blog-post there about Cecil
Rhodes links
are high quality.) It lists a few of its sources but fails to link to the main
one, which was the 370-page masterpiece by Professor Carroll Quigley, which work had been completed in 1949 but remained
unpublished until 1981 (after the author’s 1977 death, because he wanted to be
safe against their destroying him). That masterpiece from Quigley is
titled The Anglo-American Establishment. On page 326 of the photographed book shown in McClaughry’s article, 311 of the searchable text of the book, appears the list of the 31 original
members of the innermost group that controlled the British Empire’s
as-of-12-December-2019 doomed expansion-operation, which they had been
intending should ultimately take over the entire world:
A. The Society of the Elect
Cecil John Rhodes
Nathan Rothschild, Baron Rothschild
Sir Harry Johnston
William T. Stead
Reginald Brett, Viscount Esher
Alfred Milner, Viscount Milner
B. F. Hawksley
Thomas Brassey, Lord Brassey
Edmund Garrett
Alfred Beit
Sir Abe Bailey
Albert Grey, Earl Grey
Archibald Primrose, Earl of Rosebery
Arthur James Balfour
Sir George R. Parkin
Philip Lyttelton Gell
Sir Henry Birchenough
Sir Reginald Sothern Holland
Arthur Lionel Smith
Herbert A. L. Fisher
William Waldegrave Palmer, Earl of Selborne
Sir Patrick Duncan
Robert Henry Brand, Baron Brand
Philip Kerr, Marquess of Lothian
Lionel Curtis
Geoffrey Dawson
Edward Grigg, Baron Altrincham
Jan C. Smuts
Leopold Amery
Waldorf Astor, Viscount Astor
Nancy Astor, Lady Astor
——
John Marshall Harlan
J.W. Fulbright
Robert J. Van de Graaff
Robert Penn Warren
Carl Albert
Dean Rusk
Daniel J. Boorstin
John B. Oakes
Howard K. Smith
Walt Rostow
Byron White
Nicholas Katzenbach
Stansfield Turner
Guido Calabresi
Ronald Dworkin
Paul Sarbanes
Richard Lugar
Kris Kristofferson
Joseph Nye
Jonathan Kozol
Lester Thurow
David Souter
David Boren
Walter Slocombe
James Woolsey
Larry Pressler
Bill Bradley
Wesley Clark
A. Michael Spence
David E. Kendall
Terence Malick
Dennis C. Blair
Robert Reich
Bill Clinton
Strobe Talbot
Ira Magaziner
James Fallows
Franklin Raines
Michael Kinsley
E.J. Dionne
Richard N. Haass
Walter Isaacson
Larry Sabato
Russ Feingold
Michael Sandel
Ashton Carter
NancyAnn DeParle
Tony Abbott, PM Australia
Nicholas Kristof
Barton Gellman
Heather Wilson
David Vitter
George Stephanopoulos
Naomi Wolf
Michael McFaul
Susan Rice
David Chalmers
Atul Gewande
Ben Jealous
Jeff Shesol
Cory Booker
Noah Feldman
Bobby Jindal
Peter Beinart
Chrystia Freeland
Eric Garcetti
Siddhartha Mukherjee
Rachel Maddow
Jake Sullivan
Jared Cohen
Pete Buttigieg
——
The Rhodes Trust organization is extremely secretive and provides no list of its total winners
(identifying each winner in each year), which list would reveal the extent to which they had
picked from among the tens or hundreds of
thousands of applicants the individuals whom the Rhodes Trust had actually helped to
become shapers and leaders of their respective professions in the U.S., UK, and
their vassal nations. However, the Trust’s known picks seem to be oriented
toward leading and shaping the U.S. empire (not actually
the British Empire). The selectees carry on the work of Cecil Rhodes; and, now,
the U.S. aristocracy (after the 12 December 2019 UK elections) clearly controls
the UK aristocracy, which had created the Rhodes Trust (and which currently controls
UK’s ‘news’-media through the participating billionaires). This organization’s
selectees are not only trained to take over the empire for America’s
billionaires but are indoctrinated to respect not only the empire but
imperialism itself, and the subordinacy of the empire’s vassal nations, to the
imperial center, and the absolute inferiority of other (as Rhodes preached it)
“races.”
Consequently: history, going forward, will now be a contest between, on
one side, the U.S. and UK aristocracies, versus, on the opposed side, the
aristocracies of the EurAsian Continent. Because of the results of UK’s
December 12th elections, the ties that bind European nations to the U.S. regime are even likelier to unravel than was the case
prior to December 12th. This will be good news for Iran, Russia, China, and
Turkey, but bad news for NATO, EU, Saudi Arabia, Israel, and U.S. ‘allies’
(vassal-operations or dependencies) in general. In other words: the dream of
the U.S. imperialists, which Barack Obama stated often by his bold assertion
that “The
United States is and remains the one indispensable nation” — meaning that every other nation is “dispensable”
— is even more shattered now than it was when he was in office. By winning UK
so overwhelmingly on December 12th, America’s aristocracy becomes considerably
likelier to lose the vastly larger prize of EurAsia.
The Western Hemisphere, except for U.S. itself, will be weak vassal
nations, and Africa will be even more extremely so. Those weaker nations will
now need to ally themselves with either U.S.-UK, or else Eurasia. That’s their
choice, going forward.
Here are excerpts from Cecil Rhodes’s 1877 “Confession of Faith”:
I contend that we are the finest race in the world and
that the more of the world we inhabit the better it is for the human race. Just
fancy those parts that are at present inhabited by the most despicable
specimens of human beings what an alteration there would be if they were
brought under Anglo-Saxon influence, look again at the extra employment a new
country added to our dominions gives. I contend that every acre added to our
territory means in the future birth to some more of the English race who otherwise
would not be brought into existence. Added to this the absorption of the
greater portion of the world under our rule simply means the end of all wars. …
Why should we not form a secret society with but one
object the furtherance of the British Empire and the bringing of the whole
uncivilised world under British rule for the recovery of the United States for
the making the Anglo-Saxon race but one Empire. …
Even from an American’s point of view just picture
what they have lost, look at their government, are not the frauds that yearly
come before the public view a disgrace to any country and especially their’s
which is the finest in the world. …
Africa is still lying ready for us it is our duty to
take it. … More territory simply means more of the Anglo-Saxon race more of the
best the most human, most honourable race the world possesses.
To forward such a scheme what a splendid help a secret
society would be a society not openly acknowledged but who would work in secret
for such an object. …
In every Colonial legislature the Society should
attempt to have its members prepared at all times to vote or speak and advocate
the closer union of England and the colonies, to crush all disloyalty and every
movement for the severance of our Empire. The Society should inspire and even
own portions of the press for the press rules the mind of the people. …
For fear that death might cut me off before the time
for attempting its development I leave all my worldly goods in trust to S. G.
Shippard and the Secretary for the Colonies at the time of my death to try to
form such a Society with such an object.
In that same year, 1877, when he was not yet a wealthy man, he first
drafted his will. He revised it up until his death in 1902.
Here is the opening of Quigley’s 1981 masterpiece, The Anglo-American Establishment:
One wintry afternoon in February 1891, three men were
engaged in earnest conversation in London. From that conversation were to flow
consequences of the greatest importance to the British Empire and to the world
as a whole. For these men were organizing a secret society that was, for more
than fifty years, to be one of the most important forces in the formulation and
execution of British imperial and foreign policy.
The three men who were thus engaged were already well
known in England. The leader was Cecil Rhodes, fabulously wealthy
empire-builder and the most important person in South Africa. The second was
William T. Stead, the most famous, and probably also the most sensational,
journalist of the day. The third was Reginald Baliol Brett, later known as Lord
Esher, friend and confidant of Queen Victoria, and later to be the most
influential adviser of King Edward VII and King George V.
The details of this important conversation will be
examined later. At present we need only point out that the three drew up a plan
of organization for their secret society and a list of original members. The
plan of organization provided for an inner circle, to be known as “The Society
of the Elect,” and an outer circle, to be known as “The Association of
Helpers.” Within The Society of the Elect, the real power was to be exercised
by the leader, and a “Junta of Three.” The leader was to be Rhodes, and the
Junta was to be Stead, Brett, and Alfred Milner. In accordance with this
decision, Milner was added to the society by Stead shortly after that meeting
we have described.[1].
The creation of this secret society was not a matter
of a moment. As we shall see, Rhodes had been planning for this event for more
than seventeen years. Stead had been introduced to the plan on 4 April 1899,
and Brett had been told of it on 3 February 1890. Nor was the society thus
founded an ephemeral thing, for, in modified form, it exists to this day.
So, what had begun as a plan to globalize the UK empire by means of
attaching the U.S. to it, has by now become a vassalage of UK to U.S., which
vassalization will produce an asset-stripping of the UK state, and a resultant
soaring impoverishment of the UK public, which population the U.S. and UK
international corporations will then drain, thus creating a greatly increased
emigration from the UK.
The UK empire has thus come crashing down.
Rhodes, the first of the “neoconservatives” (or promoters of an
all-encompassing U.S.-UK Empire) had made his fortune on the giant Kimberly
Mine in South Africa, the world’s biggest diamond mine. And South Africa during
its racist apartheid era happens also to point the way toward what the future
UK might become.
The great 1989 movie A Dry White Season is a meticulously accurate reconstruction of
South Africa during the apartheid period, and of the way that Blacks were
treated there (not only in that movie but in the reality). The way that Blacks were treated there, by South
Africa’s U.S-backed apartheid Government, could turn out to be the way that all
but the few wealthiest UK ‘citizens’ (actually royal subjects) will be treated by
the U.S.-backed UK’s Government, in UK’s future. But, unlike in South Africa,
revenge by the public would then produce in UK a very bloody revolution, which
would be destructive, not the “Truth and Reconciliation” result that occurred
in South Africa. This is only the beginning (and though that
news-report on December 13th which is linked-to by that “This,” has an anti-leftist,
pro-conservative slant, its videos display the start of what is likely to grow
into a full-fledged revolution in UK). Fascism isn’t pretty, and it doesn’t
always end in the peaceful way that it did in Franco’s Spain, or in apartheid
South Africa. Sometimes, it ends more like France’s monarchy did during the
1789-99 French Revolution — with one imperialistic dictatorship giving
rise to yet another. This revolution will probably happen to UK before it
happens to U.S. If it does, then U.S. will probably bloodily put down the
revolution in UK, but if that happens, then only a control over the
‘news’-media that’s even more total than what currently exists in U.S. would be
able to prevent a revolution from resulting in U.S. — and such extremely total
control over the media is unlikely anywhere.
To this reporter’s knowledge (which, however, might be incomplete), the
first-ever public report that the U.S. regime is using sanctions as the preliminary and
cheaper stage toward a possible military invasion was here (from me on 27 May 2019). What Mnuchin on
December 14th said, to CNBC, provides the first official confirmation that this
reporter has yet seen of this now not-only-established but even officially
acknowledged fact. It is now, officially, the U.S. regime versus,
actually, the entire rest of the world, and sanctions are the first line of
attack. This is an even more-aggressive official assertion of that “Amerika
über alles” than was Barack Obama’s repeatedly asserted “The United States is and remains
the one indispensable nation.” There it is, in black and white: to the U.S.
regime, every other nation is “dispensable.” Cecil Rhodes, and the prominent
followers in his tradition, such as George Soros, couldn’t have said it better. Trump likewise is in
that tradition, though his rhetoric is quite different.
Right now, EU media appear to be reluctant to report that the U.S. regime is exceeding the bounds of the post-WW-II
alliance — reluctant to report that America is going overtly hostile. For
example, whereas, on December 22nd, the
very top of the home-page of Russia’s RT headlined “Oh, really? US envoy to Germany
says Nord Stream 2 sanctions ‘EXTREMELY PRO-EUROPEAN’ despite Berlin & EU
criticism”,
Germany’s Deutsche Welle was still ignoring the problem (underplaying, when not
simply ignoring altogether, that “Berlin & EU criticism”), and, on
its home
page, didn’t show even
a single headline which related to this momentous matter concerning the future
for all Germans. Perhaps they’re hoping there’s hope, and think that reporting
the current reality would be ‘premature’ at the present time. But isn’t the
current reality what the “news” is supposed to be reporting?
Why aren’t they?
P.S.: The posting of this article at The Saker produced from readers there some objections
that, as one put it, “The EU and US are not antipodes they are twin. The EU is
controlled through NATO and the ongoing occupation of Europe.” But nothing
in this article contradicts that. Another said, “I know from reading (also for
work) that NATO membership = Phase 1; EU membership = phase 2, of ‘integration’
into Europe. And, yes, the weapons and command systems are all integrated.” To
that, I responded: “My article here is predicting the breakup of NATO.” So, I
state this here, just in case anyone here doesn’t recognize that it does
predict NATO’s breakup. The U.S. is mainly going to get to keep EU/NATO nations
bordering Russia, because America’s aristocracy plans to launch from there its
invasion of Russia. As far as their other objective of boosting foreign sales
of U.S. weaponry is concerned, those foreign sales are already going mainly to
the Arab royals and Israel, so NATO’s original main function, of selling U.S.
weapons to Europe, is already now secondary. And it’s also important to
recognize that all of this started on 26 July 1945 when Truman decided to start what
became subsequently known as “the Cold War”, and that this war has secretly continued till now
after G.H.W. Bush on 24
February 1990 secretly ordered his European vassals to do so.
—————
Investigative historian Eric Zuesse is the author, most recently,
of They’re Not Even Close: The
Democratic vs. Republican Economic Records, 1910-2010, and
of CHRIST’S VENTRILOQUISTS: The Event that Created
Christianity.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.