by Eric
Zuesse
January 10, 2020
On January 9th, Iraq’s Prime
Minister and Parliament again ordered all American troops out, but on January 10th the AP headlined “US dismisses Iraq request to work on a troop
withdrawal plan” and
reported that the U.S. State Department “bluntly rejected the request, saying
the two sides should instead talk about how to ‘recommit’ to their
partnership.” It was not a “request” from Iraq; it was a command from them; and
the U.S. and Iraq relate as conqueror and conquered, not as “partners.”
Consequently: the U.S. Government, now that it has been so unequivocally
ordered to leave, is back again, unequivocally, to its invader-occupier role in
Iraq.
The AP report went on to say
that, “The request from Prime Minister Adel Abdul-Mahdi pointed to his
determination to push ahead with demands for U.S. troops to leave Iraq.” Again
there was that false word “request.” The AP report said that U.S. Secretary of
State Mike Pompeo asserted, in reply, “Our mission set there is very clear.
We’ve been there to perform a training mission to help the Iraqi security
forces be successful and to continue the campaign against ISIS, to continue the
counter-Daesh campaign.” Though that’s the invader-occupier’s excuse, the reality
is that the U.S. needs Iraq in order to invade Iran, which is the U.S.
Government’s objective, though not overtly stated.
Already, America’s
assassination in Iraq of Iran’s top general Qasem Soleimani on January 3rd is
an enormous act of war against Iran. It is intended to obliterate Iran’s main
strategist, and this successful attack against Iran inside Iraq is a
devastating first strike, by the U.S. Government against Iran.
So: now, the U.S. is at war
against both Iraq and Iran.
Investigative historian Eric
Zuesse is the author, most recently, of They’re Not Even Close: The
Democratic vs. Republican Economic Records, 1910-2010, and
of CHRIST’S VENTRILOQUISTS: The Event that Created
Christianity.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.