Measures taken by the Baltic
States are insufficient
NATO’s enhanced Forward
Presence Battlegroup in Latvia in March completed two exercises.
April 4, 2020
The Ministers of Foreign
Affairs of NATO met on April, 2 in the midst of an unprecedented pandemic.
Though they expressed the deepest sympathies with all the victims of the
Coronavirus disease, NATO continues to do its part.
The organization tries to
kill two birds with one stone. On the one hand, Commander, U.S. European
Command, Gen Tod D. Wolters commented that linked exercises to Defender-Europe
20 in the Baltic States, along with a number of other planned events, were cancelled.
On the other hand, NATO’s enhanced Forward Presence Battlegroups in Latvia and
Lithuania continue training together with national troops putting military at
risk of COVID 19 infection.
Thus, NATO’s enhanced
Forward Presence Battlegroup in Latvia in March completed two exercises,
CRYSTAL ARROW and IRON SPEAR, demonstrating its ability to effectively work
together on the battlefield. It is difficult to imagine how soldiers practiced
social distancing while being in tanks. It looks as if NATO and local military
authorities try to reassure the population and the military and convince them
of the absence of threat.
The more so, it was reported
that NATO eFP units from Norway (the Telemark Battalion) together with US
JTAC’s and M-1 Abrams tanks (1-9 CAV) conducted on March 25 Combined Arms Live
Fire Exercise (CALFEX) on the Pabrade training grounds. The focus was to
maintain combat readiness and perform complex training as part of the NATO
mission to Lithuania. At the same time the battalion confirmed last week that
24 troops had tested positive for the coronavirus. NATO conducts exercises in
the Baltic States despite COVID 19 spread among troops.
In spite of this fact, NATO
remains active openly demonstrating its ability of collective defence against
threats. Though the nature of threats has changed drastically, NATO showed
flexibility only in words. Apparently, NATO and the U.S. in particular is not
going to give up its policy in the region. The U.S. cannot allow NATO to give
up the idea of making Europe a battlefield in case of conflict with Russia.
As for the Baltic States’
authorities, they should realize that the presence and ongoing activity of NATO
Battlegroups on their territory poses a real threat to the region, though today
it is not military.
NATO enhanced Forward
Presence keeps its promise to the Baltic States. And what about the promises
Baltic authorities gave to their own people?
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.