U.S.
Empire: Biden and Kerry Gave Orders to Ukraine’s President
Eric Zuesse,
originally posted at Strategic
Culture
On May
19th, an implicit international political warning was issued, but it wasn’t
issued between countries; it was issued between allied versus opposed
factions within each of two countries: U.S. and Ukraine. In
the United States, it’s a Republican Party warning to the Democratic Party: a
warning by Trump, against Biden and against Obama. It’s saying: “We’ve got the
goods on you, and we’re not releasing it yet. But here’s a sample. So, let’s
deal.”
It’s a
warning that comes from the current President of Ukraine, Volodmyr Zelenskiy,
and that places into an exceptionally bad light his immediate predecessor,
Petro Poroshenko, as having been a mere vassal of Trump’s immediate
predecessor, Obama.
The
Ukrainian pro-Zelenskiy, anti-Poroshenko, and pro-Trump, faction, are warning
the U.S. Democratic Party, which backed Poroshenko. This warning comes via an
online pro-Zelenskiy Ukrainian TV station, InTimeUkraineTV, and it was issued in a 32-minute 19 May 2020
youtube:
One can
hear there, first, U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry, and then U.S. Vice
President Joe Biden, tell Ukraine’s President Petro Poroshenko how to run his
country so that the IMF would continue to guarantee (back up by U.S.-and-allied
taxpayers) the investments by U.S.-and-allied private investors in Ukrainian
Government debt (bonds). The alternative that Poroshenko faced was always that
those investors would lose whatever they had invested, and that Poroshenko
would then no longer be protected by the U.S. Government and by its allied
governments.
These are
only selected excerpts, and they constitute also a warning that unless the
pro-Poroshenko and pro-Obama people soon start cooperating with the
pro-Zelenskiy and pro-Trump people, portions from U.S.-Ukraine diplomatic
phone-conversations which were recorded that are even more incriminating
against the Poroshenko-Obama people will likewise be made public. In that
sense, it’s like blackmail, but it is currently only political — instead of
also legal — jeopardy.
Here are
some of the noteworthy revelations in this, the first such release:
The U.S.
officials, agents for U.S. President Barack Obama, are shown, in early 2016,
not negotiating with, but instructing, Ukraine’s President Petro Poroshenko,
who, at 17:00- 22:50, requests Biden to “increase the pressure” in order to get
the (extremist anti-Russian) parliamentary factions of Tymoshenko, Lyashko,
and Samopomich, to back the U.S.-demanded bills (proposed laws) that
are in Ukraine’s parliament. At 19:20, Biden mentions the American Natalie
“Jaresko [on her] facebook page talking about wanting to consider being Prime Minister with the
technocratic government.” Michael Bloomberg’s blog (Bloomberg News) had headlined, on 22 March
2016, “Ukraine's Jaresko Says She'd Be
Willing to Head New Cabinet”, and reported that neither President Poroshenko nor
the (secretly Obama-appointed — see video here of that secret U.S. appointment
of Ukraine’s Prime Minister, and the transcript and explanation of it here) then-current (that U.S.-appointed) Ukrainian Prime
Minister, Arseniy Yatsenyuk, would speak publicly regarding the initiative by
the American Natalie Jaresko to become (the American-appointed) Yatsenyuk’s successor. Poroshenko’s reply to Biden
was to “promise [you] to receive my proposal about the technocratic government
of Jaresko.” Bloomberg’s employees reported there that the IMF wanted her to
become Yatsenyuk’s successor so that “The reforms will be more radical, and it
means more political risks, more possible conflicts with parliament” (because —
though Bloomberg hid this — protecting the investors in Ukrainian Government
bonds would require yet more impoverishment of the Ukrainian public). As
Poroshenko told Biden at 20:00, “the reason of the political crisis is that the
three fractions [factions, or political parties] from Samopomich, Tymoshenko
and Lyashko, go out from [leave] the coalition, and we [are] left together with
the [U.S.-appointed] Prime Minister in a minority. I invite Samopomich and
propose them to either to support Jaresko or to propose his [its] leader as a
[the] next Prime Minister.” So, although Poroshenko had not publicly endorsed
Jaresko’s bid to become the next Prime Minister to replace the current
American-appointed one, he did confirm privately to Biden that he supported
either her or Samopomich’s pick to fill that spot. But Poroshenko went on to
say that Samopomich would cooperate but only this one time, and Poroshenko then
explained to Biden, “This is not possible under our Constitution; they should
sign up personally their membership in coalition,” which they refused to do.
The vassal, Poroshenko, was here explaining to the emperor,
Obama (through the emperor’s messenger, Biden), the difficulties
that were blocking the IMF’s forced enserfment of the Ukrainian people.
(22:15:) “Without Samopomich, with the rejection of Tymoshenko and Lyashko, we
don’t have [enough] for your ask [of] 226” votes (a governing majority — which
would enable Ukraine’s public to become yet-more exploited directly, and
U.S.-and-allied publics to become more exploited indirectly because the
downside financial risks of those international debts would then be transferred
onto them). (22:40:) “I asked to contact [your] Ambassador maybe to increase
the pressure and to support Jaresko’s candidacy by Samopomich.” (23:23:) “Our
U.S. partners give grants to Samopomich and give him [it] significant financial
support.” Poroshenko was telling Obama (via Biden) “maybe to increase the
pressure,” if he wants to get Ukraine’s elected politicians to cooperate. He
was saying: They don’t want to lose their seats, but maybe more money from U.S.
taxpayers might persuade them to take the risk of losing their seats (via
sufficiently high bribes and/or threats).
Whether
InTimeUkraineTV, or any other Zelenskiy front, has these recordings going all
the way back to the coup that handed control of Ukraine’s Government over
to the United States Government, is not known, but the prior evidence suggests that it almost certainly is the case.
Whether or
not there are already ongoing negotiations between the Trump team and the Obama
team regarding how America will be run (or how America’s ‘elections’ will be
run), is even less certain. What has not been disclosed from those recordings
is a weapon.
—————
Investigative
historian Eric Zuesse is the author, most recently, of They’re Not
Even Close: The Democratic vs. Republican Economic Records, 1910-2010, and
of CHRIST’S VENTRILOQUISTS: The Event that Created
Christianity.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.