Debate: Is ‘Russiagate’ a CIA Hoax?
Eric Zuesse
July 31, 2020
There now is a public debate regarding whether or
not ‘Russiagate’ was/is a CIA-generated hoax, instead of (as it has been
reported) a Russian Government hacking operation. Whatever it was, did spark
massive U.S. economic and other sanctions against Russia, and is therefore
important in today’s U.S. international relations. Had the CIA actually created
the “evidence”? Were those sanctions based upon a U.S. Government fraud? That
is the question here.
On July 30th, the former Technical Director of
the NSA — America’s top position on cyber intelligence including
computer-hacking — Bill Binney, summarized,
by a ten-minute presentation, the latest up-to-date information that exists
regarding, and discussing, the actual sources of the various unauthorized
releases, to the public, of emails and other documents from the computers of
the Democratic National Committee and of John Podesta who headed the
Presidential campaign of Hillary Clinton. Binney alleged there that the raw
data prove conclusively — not just speculatively — that the CIA tampered with
the evidence, in order to become enabled to accuse Russia as having been involved
in those unauthorized information-releases. He further alleged that Robert
Mueller’s report on the Democratic Party’s charges that Russia and Trump were
involved in these matters was false when it unquestioningly accepted the CIA’s
assertions against Russia and on that basis accused the Internet Research
Agency, in Russia, as having “hacked” the data. Consequently: if Binney’s case
is correct, then recent U.S. history is based upon fraud by the U.S. Government
itself. This would be a case like America’s 2003 invasion of Iraq, but perhaps
even worse.
One of the news-sites that published his
presentation was Silver
Doctors. A reader-comment there, from an anonymous “Fred,” challenged
Binney’s reconstruction of what had occurred. Here below is Fred’s
reader-comment, and Binney’s response to it:
- Fred
OMG, what a quack, I watched the video and as a cyber security professional, the man knows spews a lot of terminology but really knows nothing. First, time stamps can change every time files are moved to a new source. Of course they would be very close to each other when copying in bulk. Emails are mostly text if they don't have attachments which takes up very little space. Depending on the system all the emails can be contained in one file, so when that 1 file is transferred and of the contents would be the same time stamp. 2nd, of course data can be transferred at much high rates than 19mbs, what is he living in the 20th century? We have gigabyte internet now., data can be transferred well over 100 mbs. 3rd. he presents no evidence directly linking CIA other than to say, who else could have done it. His whole theory is just an opinion, absolute rubbish. No wonder he's not taken seriously.
Reply
Eric Zuesse Fred
"Fred," I sent your comment to Bill Binney and asked him to respond. His response included an attachment, which probably won't be able to be included here, but I now am pasting here his reply to you:- Eric, here are my
comments to this “professional.”
- "OMG, what a quack,”
- When people don’t have any
substance to address, they throw labels out to try and prejudice
the issue.
- " I watched the video
and as a cyber security professional, the man knows spews a lot of
terminology but really knows nothing.”
- I guess I achieved the
position of Technical Director of the World Geopolitical and Military Analysis
and Reporting at NSA by knowing nothing. Sure! This is a typical baseless assertion
that
- Sophists make all the
time. And our country has thousands of people like this.
- "First, time
stamps can change every time files are moved to a new source. Of course
they would be very close to each other when copying in bulk. Emails are
mostly text if they don't have attachments which takes up very little
space. Depending on the system all the emails can be contained in
one file, so when that 1 file is transferred and of the contents would be
the same time stamp.”
- The last modified times on
the DNC emails had different times all rounded to the nearest even
number. See attachment. For comparison, this file contains
the DNC email last modified times (LMT) showing FAT file
- properties and the Podesta
emails LMT’s that do not show FAT file properties.
- "
2nd, of course data can be
Reply
Eric Zuesse Eric Zuesse
(continued): - "2nd, of course data
can be transferred at much high rates than 19mbs, what is he living in
the 20th century? We have gigabyte internet now., data can be transferred
well over 100 mbs.:”
- While the ISP standard is
Mbps = mega bits per second and MBps = mega bytes per second, I believe
Fred is referring to mega bytes per second. What he says is true
but only for shorter distances - not
- across the Atlantic to
Europe let alone Russia. In our testing, the further east we went;
the lower speeds we got. In other words, assuming there was a
hacker, he/she would have to have a high speed line
- all the way from the
target to the hackers location. The WWW does not support that.
If Fred thinks it does, he needs to illustrate/prove where and how
that can be achieved. So
far, no one has done that -
- not even NSA/CIA/FBI or
private security companies.
- " 3rd. he presents no
evidence directly linking CIA other than to say, who else could have done
it. His whole theory is just an opinion, absolute rubbish. No wonder he's
not taken seriously.”
- Does Fred work for
CIA? Or, is he just an advocate for them? In either case, I
pointed out what evidence we have which is circumstantial and not
absolute. But, in terms used in the ICA of CIA/NSA/FBI,
- I have “high confidence
that CIA did it."
- Note: all this data
including Guccifer 2.0 files and speed calculations have been provided to
lawyers in several currently on-going court cases.
—————
Investigative historian Eric Zuesse is the
author, most recently, of They’re Not
Even Close: The Democratic vs. Republican Economic Records, 1910-2010, and
of CHRIST’S VENTRILOQUISTS: The Event that Created
Christianity.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.