Covid-19 Started in Italy, in
September 2019, Not in China in December
Eric Zuesse
-- November 16, 2020
The
covid-19, or coronavirus-19, virus didn’t start in Wuhan China in December
2019, as has been widely reported till now. This new or “novel” virus was first
infecting people in Italy, by no later than September 2019, according to
researchers at the Italian Association for Cancer
Research, and published on November 11th, as
Current Research, by the National Tumors Institute of the Italian Ministry of
Health.
This study
is titled “Unexpected detection of SARS-CoV-2
antibodies in the pre-pandemic period in Italy”. It reports that:
“The first
surge of positive cases was identified in September-October 2019. Evaluation of
anti-SARS-CoV-2 functional NAbs identified positive samples in CPE-based
microneutralization tests already collected in October 2019. Given the temporal
delay between infection and antibody synthesis, these results indicate that the
virus circulated in Italy well before the detection of the declared index
patient in February 2020. In addition, most of the first antibody-positive
individuals lived in regions where the pandemic started.”
In other
words: though the first officially noticed covid-19-infected
Italians were in February 2020, there had been covid-19-infected people in
Italy starting by no later than September 2019. Consequently, one reason why
Italy was one of the three most covid-19-infected nations as early as 1 March 2020
(right behind China and South Korea), might be that China and
South Korea were the first two countries that noticed this new
virus. On 31 January 2020, Italy suspended all flights to and from China and
declared a state of emergency, but 26 February 2020 was the first date when
Italy reported covid-19 cases, and there were already 147 in Italy on
that date. The Italian Government explained its sudden cessation of air-flights by
saying that a Chinese couple from Wuhan had arrived in Italy on January 23rd
and became diagnosed with the new disease on January 30th. China had started reporting cases already a
month earlier, on 23 January 2020: 259 of them. Within two weeks
thereafter, China’s leaders established total lockdown and
intensive nationwide searches to find possible cases that they had previously
missed; so, on February 12th, there was an enormous spike in China’s known
cases, 14,108 of them, reported on that date. That number declined down to 573
new daily cases on February 29th. No number even close to that number (573) has
been reported after that date in China.
Two weeks
after 1 March, on 15 March 2020, Italy had by far the
world’s highest intensity of coronavirus infections as calculated at that time,
at the rate of 409.3 cases per million residents, and China had 56.2 cases per
million. (U.S. had 11.1 per million.) However, the tiny nation of San Marino,
which is surrounded within Italy, had 109 total cases, and only 34,232
population (which was too small for that nation to have been included among the
ones which were then being calculated); so, that’s a per-million rate of 3,184
infections per million, which was actually (and by far) the
world’s highest rate of covid-infections, at that time. Consequently: the first
person who became infected by this virus could well have been a San Marinan,
instead of an Italian.
As more
research is done, regarding this virus, the actual geographical source of it
could turn out to be any country, because international travel and tourism are
now commonplace, which was not formerly so. Maybe the Italian cases in
September 2019 had resulted from a foreign visitor, instead of from an Italian.
In the future, global pandemics will likely be far more frequent than in earlier
history, but technology (such as vaccines) and the world adjusts so that there
might not be a higher percentage of the global population dying from plagues
than has been so in the past. Making predictions on the basis of the latest
prior mega-pandemic, which was the Spanish flu of 1918-1920, might not be
entirely appropriate. The Spanish flu most likely started in America, not in
Spain, but, according to Wikipedia, “To maintain morale, World
War I censors minimized these early reports. Newspapers were free to
report the epidemic's effects in neutral Spain, such as the grave
illness of King Alfonso XIII, and these stories created a false impression
of Spain as especially hard hit. This gave rise to the name ‘Spanish’ flu.
Historical and epidemiological data are inadequate to identify with
certainty the pandemic's geographic origin, with varying views as to its
location.” In other words, what the masses of the public believe at any given
time can be shaped by the government and by its newspapers and broadcasters,
simply by hiding facts that the people who actually control the country don’t want the public
to know. Censorship is
the core of dictatorship, and almost all countries are actually
dictatorships, but the news-media there censor-out that fact, instead of
publishing it. So, the reality of censorship is, itself, hidden
from the public, in order for the people who control the government to control the masses
so that the nation can be called a “democracy.” That’s important for them to do
in order to minimize the percentage of the population they’ll need to imprison.
However, the United States already has a higher
percentage of its residents in prison than does any other country; and, so, its news-media
are especially highly censored, in order to be able to prevent an outright
revolution. Forcing both the body and the mind could turn out to be too much,
but apparently the individuals who are in control feel they need to go that
far, in order to remain in control.
But,
regardless, any politician who calls covid-19 “the Wuhan virus” or “the China
virus” is expressing that person’s agenda, instead of anything about reality,
since the actual first case of this disease could have appeared anywhere.
(NOTE: The “gain-of-function”
hypotheses, and evidence of Chinese bio-warfare research being funded by the
Pentagon and participated in by Canada, do raise questions, which should be
answered; but more basic than whether this virus was natural or instead
man-made, is precisely where and how it first got released out into the public.
We don’t yet really know the answer even to that extremely important question —
a question which must be answered BEFORE one can even begin to address the
question of whether that event was natural or instead military. This is the
basic question, and its answer is still unknown. It’s the first question that
must be answered before anything else can become known about how the global
pandemic started.)
—————
Investigative
historian Eric Zuesse is the author, most recently, of They’re Not
Even Close: The Democratic vs. Republican Economic Records, 1910-2010, and of CHRIST’S
VENTRILOQUISTS: The Event that Created Christianity.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.