The Destructive Plan Behind the Biden Russia Agenda
29.01.2021 Author: F. William Engdahl
Column: Politics
Region: USA in the World
The new Biden Administration has from day one made it clear it will adopt a hostile and aggressive policy against the Russian Federation of Vladimir Putin. The policy behind this stance has nothing to do with any foul deeds Putin’s Russia may or may not have committed against the West. It has nothing to do with absurd allegations that Putin had pro-US dissident Alexei Navalny poisoned with the ultra-deadly Novichok nerve agent. In has to do with a far deeper agenda of the globalist Powers That Be. That agenda is what is being advanced now.
The Cabinet choices of Joe Biden
reveal much. His key foreign policy picks–Tony Blinken as Secretary of State
and Victoria Nuland as Under Secretary of State for Political Affairs; Bill Burns
as CIA head; Jake Sullivan as National Security Advisor ; Avril Haines as
Director of National Intelligence—all are from the Obama-Biden Administration
and all have worked closely together. As well, all see Russia, not China, as
the prime security threat to the United States’ global hegemony.
As candidate, Joe Biden stated
this often. His key foreign policy choices underscore that the focus with the
Biden Administration, regardless how fit Biden himself is, will shift from the
China threats to that of Putin’s Russia. Biden’s CIA head, Bill Burns, is a
former Ambassador to Moscow and was Deputy Secretary of State during the Obama
CIA coup d’etat in Ukraine in 2014. Notably, when Burns left State in November
2014 he was succeeded by Tony Blinken, now Secretary of State. Blinken
reportedly formulated the US State Department response to Russia’s Crimea
annexation.
Nuland is key
All Biden choices are uniformly
clear in blaming Putin’s Russia for everything from US election interference in
2016 to the recent SolarWinds US government computer hack, to every other claim
aired against Russia in recent years, whether proven or not.
In trying to determine what the
new Biden Administration and the US intelligence agencies have in store towards
Putin and Russia, however, the best indication is the prominent role being
given to Victoria Nuland, the person, together with then-Vice President Joe
Biden, who ran the political side of the US coup d’etat in Ukraine in 2013-14.
She infamously was wire-tapped in a phone call to the US Ambassador in Kiev
during the Maidan Square 2013-14 protests, telling the Ambassador Geoffrey
Pyatt, regarding EU choices for a new Ukraine regime, “F**k the EU.” Her
husband, Robert Kagan is a notorious Washington neocon.
On leaving government on Trump’s
election in 2016, Nuland became a Senior Counselor at the Albright Stonebridge
Group, headed by former Clinton Secretary of State Madeline Albright who is
also chairman of the National Endowment for Democracy (NED) affiliate, National
Democratic Institute. Nuland also joined the Board of the NED, after 2016,
keeping in close contact with NED regime
change operations. She is a Russia expert, fluent in Russian and a
specialist in toppling regimes.
As Obama Assistant Secretary of
State for Eurasian and European Affairs in 2013, Nuland worked closely with
Vice President Joe Biden to put into power Arseniy Yatsenyuk in a US-friendly
and Russia-hostile Ukraine coup. She fostered months of protest against the
regime of the elected President of Ukraine, Victor Yanukovych, to force his
ouster after his decision to join the Russian Eurasian Economic Union. Founder
of the private intelligence group Stratfor, George Friedman, in an interview
just after the February 2014 coup in Kiev, called it “the most blatant coup in (US) history.”
New Initiatives
In a major article in the August,
2020 Foreign Affairs, journal of the New York Council on Foreign Relations
(CFR), Nuland outlines what most likely will be US strategy for undermining
Russia in the coming months. She complains that, “resignation has set in about
the state of US-Russian relations, and Americans have lost confidence in their
own ability to change the game.” In other words, she is about “changing the
game” with Putin. She charges that in the past 12 years, “Russia has violated
arms control treaties; fielded new, destabilizing weapons; threatened Georgia’s
sovereignty; seized Crimea and much of the Donbass; and propped up despots in
Libya, Syria, and Venezuela. It has used cyber-weapons against foreign banks,
electrical grids, and government systems; interfered in foreign democratic
elections; and assassinated its enemies on European soil.”
She goes on to say the repeated
US economic sanctions on select Russian banks and companies as well as Putin
backers have done little to change Russian policy, claiming that, ”US and
allied sanctions, although initially painful, have grown leaky or impotent with
overuse and no longer impress the Kremlin.”
But Nuland suggests that Putin’s
Russia today is vulnerable as never in the past 20 years: “the one thing that
should worry the Russian president: the mood inside Russia. Despite Putin’s
power moves abroad, 20 years of failing to invest in Russia’s modernization may
be catching up with him. In 2019, Russia’s GDP growth was an anemic 1.3
percent. This year, the coronavirus pandemic and the free fall in oil prices
could result in a significant economic contraction…Russia’s roads, rails,
schools, and hospitals are crumbling. Its citizens have grown restive as
promised infrastructure spending never appears, and their taxes and the
retirement age are going up. Corruption remains rampant, and Russians’
purchasing power continues to shrink.”
In her CFR article Nuland
advocates using, “Facebook, YouTube, and other digital platforms… there is no
reason why Washington and its allies shouldn’t be more willing to give Putin a
dose of his own medicine inside Russia, while maintaining the same deniability.”
She adds that because Russians widely use the Internet and it is largely open,
“Despite Putin’s best efforts, today’s Russia is more permeable. Young Russians
are far more likely to consume information and news via the Internet than
through state-sponsored TV or print media. Washington should try to reach more
of them where they are: on the social networks Odnoklassniki and VKontakte; on
Facebook, Telegram, and YouTube; and on the many new Russian-language digital
platforms springing up.”
Navalny
Around the time Nuland submitted
her July-August Foreign Affairs article, perennial Putin opponent,
Alexey Navalny was in Berlin, ostensibly recovering from what he claims was an
attempt by Putin’s intelligence to kill him with highly toxic nerve agent,
Novichok. Navalny, a US-educated opposition figure who was a Yale University
Fellow in 2010 has been trying to gain a strong following for well over a
decade, has been documented receiving money from Nuland’s National Endowment
for Democracy, whose founder in the 1990s described it as doing, “what the CIA
used to do, but privately.” In 2018 according to NPR in the US, Navalny had
more than six million YouTube subscribers and more than two million Twitter
followers. How many are bots paid by US intelligence is not known. Now, five
months after exile in Berlin, Navalny makes a bold return where he knew he
faced likely jail for past charges. It was obviously a clear calculation by his
Western sponsors.
The US government’s NGO for Color
Revolution regime change, the NED, in a piece published on January 25 echoes
Nuland’s call for a social media-led destabilization of Putin. Writing about
the Moscow arrest of Navalny just three days before the Biden inauguration, the
NED states that, “By creating a model of guerrilla political warfare for the
digital age, Navalny has exposed the regime’s utter lack of imagination and
inability….” They add, “Putin is in a Catch-22: If Putin kills Navalny, it
could draw more attention to the problem and exacerbate unrest. If Putin lets
Navalny live, then Navalny remains a focus for resistance, whether he is in
prison or not… Navalny has very much outmaneuvered Putin at each turn since the
poisoning. It’s becoming a bit humiliating for him.”
Since his alleged botched
poisoning in August in Russian Far East, Navalny was allowed by the Russian
government to fly to Berlin for treatment, a strange act if indeed Putin and
Russian intelligence had really wanted him dead. What clearly took place in the
intervening five months in exile suggests that Navalny’s return was
professionally prepared by unnamed Western intelligence regime change
specialists. The Kremlin has claimed intelligence that shows Navalny was
directly being tutored while in exile by CIA specialists.
On Navalny’s Moscow arrest
January 17, his anti-corruption NGO released a sophisticated YouTube
documentary on Navalny’s channel, purporting to show a vast palace alleged to
belong to Putin on the Black Sea, filmed with use of a drone, no small feat. In
the video Navalny calls on Russians to march against the alleged billion dollar
“Putin Palace” to protest corruption.
Navalny, who clearly is being
backed by sophisticated US information warfare specialists and groups such as
the NED, is likely being told to build a movement to challenge United Russia
party candidates in the September Duma elections where Putin isn’t a candidate.
He has even been given a new tactic, which he calls a “smart voting” strategy,
a hallmark NED tactic.
Stephen Sestanovich, New York
Council on Foreign Relations Russia expert and former board member of the NED,
suggested the likely game plan of the new Biden team. On January 25 Sestanovich
wrote in the CFR blog, “The Putin regime remains strong, but nationwide
protests in support of Alexei Navalny are the most serious challenge to it in
years. Opposition leader Alexei Navalny is showing a political creativity and
tactical skill that Putin has not previously faced. If the protests continue,
they could reveal vulnerabilities in his decades-long hold on power.” This was
two days after Russia-wide protests demanding Navalny’s release from jail.
“With his bold decision to return to Moscow and the release of a widely viewed
video purporting to expose regime corruption, Navalny has shown himself to be a
capable and imaginative political figure—even from jail, perhaps the most
formidable adversary Putin has faced,” he wrote. “The strategic sophistication
of Navalny’s team is underscored both by its video release and, before that, by
its exposé of the Federal Security Services (FSB) personnel who poisoned him
last summer.”
The clear decision of the Biden
team to name a former Moscow ambassador to head the CIA and Victoria Nuland to
No. 3 position at the State Department, along with his other intelligence
choices indicate that destabilizing Russia will be a prime focus of Washington
going forward. As the NED gleefully put it, “Navalny’s arrest, three days
before Biden’s inauguration former US ambassador to Russia Michael McFaul says,
has all the makings of “Biden’s first foreign policy crisis. Whatever was in
their transition documents, this is now front and center for
them.”
The reason however is not because
of domestic corruption by Putin’s inner circle, true or not. Biden could care
less. Rather it is the very existence of Russia under Putin as an independent
sovereign nation that tries to defend that national identity, whether in
military defense or in defense of a traditionally conservative Russian culture.
Ever since the US-backed NED destabilization of the Soviet Union in 1990 during
the Bush Administration, it has been NATO policy and that of the influential
financial interests behind NATO to break Russia into many parts, dismantle the
state and loot what is left of its huge raw materials resources. The globalist
Great Reset has no room for independent nation states like Russia is the
message that the new Biden team will clearly convey now.
F. William Engdahl is
strategic risk consultant and lecturer, he holds a degree in politics
from Princeton University and is a best-selling author on oil and
geopolitics, exclusively for the online magazine “New Eastern Outlook”.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.