The Art of War
Joe Biden nuclear sorcerer's
apprentice
Manlio Dinucci
President Biden announced the birth of the AUKUS, a strategic-military
partnership between the United States, Great Britain and Australia, with “the
imperative of ensuring long-term peace and stability in the Indo-Pacific",
the region that in Washington's geopolitics extends from the west coast of the
United States to that of India. The purpose of this "strategic
mission" is "to take on the threats of the 21st century just as we
did in the 20th century: together ". Clear reference to China and
Russia.
To "defend against rapidly evolving threats," the AUKUS
launches a "key project": the United States and Britain will help
Australia acquire "nuclear-powered, conventionally armed
submarines."
The first reaction to the announcement of the AUKUS project was that of
France: it thus loses a 90 billion dollar contract, stipulated with Australia,
for the supply of 12 Barracuda attack submarines with conventional propulsion.
Paris, accusing of being stabbed in the back, has withdrawn its ambassadors
from the USA and Australia. On the dispute between Paris and Washington the
political-media attention has been focused, leaving in shadow the implications
of the AUKUS project.
First of all it is not credible that the United States and Great
Britain provide Australia with the most advanced technologies to build at least
8 nuclear submarines of the latest generation, with a unit cost of about 10
billion dollars, to equip them only with conventional (non-nuclear) weapons. It
is as if they were to provide Australia with aircraft carriers unable to carry
aircraft. In reality the submarines will have launch tubes suitable
for both non-nuclear and nuclear missiles. Prime Minister Morrison has already
announced that Australia will rapidly acquire, through the U.S., "long-range
strike capabilities" with Tomahawk and hypersonic missiles that can be
armed with both conventional and nuclear warheads.
Certainly Australian submarines will also be able to launch US Trident
D5 ballistic missiles, with which US and British submarines are armed. The
Trident D5 has a range of 12,000 km and can carry up to 14 independent
thermonuclear warheads: 100 kt W76 or 475 kt W88. The Columbia nuclear attack
submarine, whose construction began in 2019, has 16 launch tubes for Trident
D5s, so it has the capacity to launch over 200 nuclear warheads capable of
destroying as many targets (bases, ports, cities and others).
Against this background, it is clear that Washington has cut off
Paris from the supply of the submarines to Australia not simply for economic
purposes (to favour its own war industries), but for strategic purposes: to
move on to a new phase of military escalation against China and Russia in the
Indo-Pacific, maintaining absolute command of the operation. Having cancelled
the supply of French submarines with conventional propulsion, obsolete for this
strategy, Washington has started what ICAN-Australia denounces as "the
increased nuclearization of Australia's military capability".
Once operational, the Australian nuclear submarines will actually be
placed in the US chain of command, which will decide their employment. These
submarines, of which no one will be able to control the real armament,
approaching in depth and silently to the coasts of China, and also to those of
Russia, could strike in a few minutes the main targets in these countries with
a destructive capacity equal to more than 20 thousand Hiroshima bombs.
It is easily predictable what the first consequence will be. China,
which according to Sipri possesses 350 nuclear warheads compared to the 5.550
of the USA, will accelerate the quantitative and qualitative development of its
nuclear forces. The economic and technological potential that it possesses
allows it to equip itself with nuclear forces comparable to those of the US and
Russia. Merit of the sorcerer's apprentice Biden who, while launching the
"key project" of nuclear submarines to Australia, extols "the
longstanding leadership of the United States in global non-proliferation".
Manlio Dinucci
(il manifesto, September 21, 2021)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.