How Israel’s Actions Against Iran Are Rooted in Cecil
Rhodes’s 1877 Plan
Eric Zuesse, Dec. 05, 2021
There has been much speculation about
why Israel was allowed in 1967 to bomb
intentionally the USS Liberty and slaughtered 34 of our soldiers on that ship
and the U.S. Government has covered-it-up. And there also is much
speculation about why, as reported to Congress by the
Congressional Research Service on 7 August 2019, “Israel is the largest
cumulative recipient of U.S. foreign assistance since World War II. To date,
the United States has provided Israel $142.3 billion (current, or
noninflation-adjusted, dollars) in bilateral assistance and missile defense
funding. Almost all U.S. bilateral aid to Israel is in the form of military
assistance.” (That “noninflation-adjusted” figure might be
closer to a trillion dollars in today’s money. For example, a billion dollars in 1971 is worth
$6.83 billion today. This means that in 1971, $146.4 billion was
worth the same as a trillion dollars is worth in today’s money. So: in today’s
money, what U.S. taxpayers have donated to Israel in order for it to pay for
U.S. missiles, etc., was almost a trillion dollars, and that’s been a gift to
U.S. armaments-firms — to the people who own those firms — for
them to sell (& U.S. taxpayers to pay for) to Israel. Nowadays, Americans
donate $3.8 billion annually to Israel. $3.3 billion of that is for U.S.-made
weapons. Why? It’s to subsidize America’s billionaires. And look at how phenominally profitable
such subsidies have helped to make their investments! (Click onto this.) In other words:
merely by misrepresenting “foreign aid” as-if it were something that it
overwhelmingly is not (and closer to being the very opposite of
“charitable”), the U.S. aristocracy become further-enriched by (and they
purchase — with taxpayer-money — the alliance, the backing, from) other nations’
aristocracies (such as Israel’s). Some gang-of-thieves!
75% of
Americans approve of Israel. Only 30% approve of the “Palestinian Authority” that
represents the people whom the Israelis conquered. Obviously, America’s
‘news’-media are strongly favorable toward Israel, and portray Israel’s victims
in as-negative-a-light as is possible to do — and they portray opposition to
Israel as being necessarily ‘anti-Semitic’. Certainly in the Palestinian case,
it’s not that — it is against evil (by Israel).
Americans aren’t outraged that their
Government donates to Israel’s constant war against Palestians (to
crush them), but instead blame the Palestinians for Israel's
decades-long ethnic-cleansing of Palestinians — its ethnic-cleansing that's in order to
retain Israel’s ‘democracy’ of Jewish rule against Muslims. Americans are
imperialists; but, in this particular instance, they are for imperialism by
Jews (especially the wealthiest of them) in that land, against Muslims
(especially the poorest of them) there, instead of being by Americans against
Cubans, or by Americans against Venezuelans, or by Americans against Ukrainians (the normal type of
attempted or achieved takeover by America’s billionaires — which group the U.S.
Government represents).
The main people among the American public
who oppose “foreign aid” are misinformed conservatives, who
think it’s stupid idealism; and the main supporters of
“foreign aid” among the American public are misinformed liberals, who think
it’s a policy to benefit the people in poor countries; but, overall,
49% of Americans say that “U.S. Is Spending Too Much On
Foreign Aid”, and only 13% say that the U.S. is spending “too
little” on it. Only very few Americans know that foreign aid is mainly to buy U.S. weapons. It is a subsidy to firms
such as Lockheed Martin. It is a secret (“off-the-balance-sheet”) addition to
America’s ‘defense’-budget. (Even on-budget — or Pentagon —
U.S. ‘defense’-spending constitutes 37% of the entire world’s military
expenditures.) And that is defense only for the aristocracy of
the given recipient-nation, in order to keep them in power so that the U.S.
aristocracy can control foreign Governments by getting the misinformed American
public to pay for those foreign regimes, which are more like the opposite of
charity — it is U.S. imperialism. And those foreign regimes are U.S.
vassal-nations. So: though the total American public are buying this
‘aid’, it’s actually for the investors in firms such as
General Dynamics. And the owners of those firms are also in control over all of
America’s major ‘news’-media, which promote those weapons-sales by pretending
that foreign aid is mainly charitable (though perhaps ‘misguided’, not intentionally evil
— which it is).
In the case of Israel, the origin of the
arrangement goes all the way back to the late 1800s, when the very concept of
today’s Israel was merely a dream for some biblically inspired and highly
ethnocentric Jews (Zionists).
Here’s how that happened:
In 1871, the well-connected young prospector,
Cecil Rhodes (son of an Anglican clergyman), got his start. “In October 1871, 18-year-old Rhodes
and his 26-year-old brother Herbert left the colony for the diamond fields of
Kimberley in Northern Cape Province. Financed by N M Rothschild & Sons,
Rhodes succeeded over the next 17 years in buying up all the smaller diamond
mining operations in the Kimberley area.” And then, starting in 1877, Rhodes drew up his
will, to create a “secret” organization, for the UK empire to take over
("take back"), by means of subversion, first the U.S. Government, and
then (with that force behind it) take control over the entire rest of the
world, so that secretly the U.S. would become the chief enforcer, globally,
for, actually, England’s aristocracy.
Part of this plan was for an “Israel” to come
into existence and serve as the English aristocracy’s enforcer over the
entire Middle East.
Franklin Delano Roosevelt, as U.S. President
just prior to Israel’s formation, opposed the creation of any “Jewish state.” He was as opposed to
that as he was to any theocracy, and especially because this
one wouldn’t be able to be brought about or function except by means of an
ethnic-cleansing in order to make Jews the majority there (if a democracy was
intended there) or else the controlling minority (if an outright and clear-cut
dictatorship there was the intention there). But, as I shall document fully in
my book to be published in 2022, AMERICA’S EVIL EMPIRE, President
Truman, who succeeded him on 12 April 1945, soon came entirely under the
influence and control of — and surrounded himself by other supporters
of — Churchill and other Rhodesists, and this included support for the new
state of Israel, though Albert
Einstein and many other leading progressive U.S. Jews opposed it, and especially
opposed Menachem Begin and Yitzhak Shamir, who ended up becoming leaders of
Israel. Truman and Churchill were Rhodesists, and Judaism was not actually much
involved in their advocacy for Israel and against the “natives” or
Palestinians; imperialism was involved, and this Israel was to be a part of
this Rhodesist empire.
In fact, Truman was the very first world-leader to
recognize the Jewish state, on 14 May 1948 — little more than a
month after the extermination-phase of the ethnic-cleansing
there had already begun. And it kept on coming. David Ben-Gurion privately
described to his son on 5 October 1937 the plan for the ethnic-cleansing, but it couldn’t be
carried-out until it had the U.S. Government’s support. Truman was key, and he
was assisting there — as throughout his international policies — the Rhodesist
agenda. This was to be a British operation, fronted by the U.S. Government. They
knew what they were doing — that the U.S. Government was fronting for
Britain’s Government. And, actually, the forced evacuations of Arabs,
and emptying-out of entire Arab towns, was planned to
start in, and did start in, December 1947; so, Truman and his British
masters had to have known what they were endorsing. And Israel was
fronting for them. All subsequent U.S. Presidents were also
Rhodesists, except Kennedy, who had been but was abandoning them shortly before
he mysteriously became assassinated.
So, here’s additional background for how that
is playing-out today:
As everybody knows, Britain had controlled
Iran (to extract its oil) before 1953, until Mohammad Mossadegh came to power
there by popular acclaim, despite the British attempts to prevent that. And
then America’s CIA operated a 1953 coup to remove the progressive Mossadegh and
replace him by the Shah, who subsequently became famous for his prisons and
their tortures (so that, this time, it would be U.S. oil firms that would be
doing the extractions instead — this was acceptable to the Brits because they
received a cut; and, furthermore, UK depended now upon America’s military
might, so, this was part of their “Special Relationship”). But, then, in 1979,
Iranians overthrew their dictatorial Shah, and installed their own Shiite
Islamic, socialistic, but largely theocratic (and therefore at least partially dictatorial)
Government. It was/is populist, instead of like the U.S.-&-UK-backed Arab
Governments, which were (and are) monarchical and totally aristocratic
(hereditary) dictatorships. The U.S. regime has, ever since, tried to reconquer
Iran. (The monarchical Arab Governments also fear Iran because Iran is — after
overthrowing the Shah — populist, anti-monarchical. Therefore, the
Arab regimes rely largely upon the U.S. regime in order for them to be able to
stay in power.)
Iran, because of its populism, is strongly
supportive of the Palestinians. Therefore, it is ideologically at war against
Israel — not because of its Judaism, but because of its ethnic-cleansing of fellow-Muslims.
Israel — not Judaism — is what Iran is opposed to. Iran,
because of Iran’s past long history of being exploited by, first, British, and
then American, imperialism, is passionately anti-Rhodesist.
Consequently, the U.S. and UK regimes want to destroy Iran — and Israel is
their chosen Rhodesist entity that fronts this U.S./UK/Israel operation.
And, therefore, we now have the present
situation:
On December 2nd, Israel’s Jewish
Chronicle (or “JC”) headlined “EXCLUSIVE: Mossad recruited top Iranian
scientists to blow up key nuclear facility: 90 per cent of the plant's
centrifuges were destroyed” in that 2 July 2020 explosion. The same
day they also headlined “Israel to hit ‘head of octopus’ in covert
attacks on Tehran”. Already on November 29th they had headlined “UK and Israel foreign ministers vow
to work "night and day" to stop Iran developing nukes: Liz Truss and
Yair Lapid sign agreement to take UK-Israel relations into a 'bold new era'”. These are Rhodesist operations,
just as America’s operations to destroy Iran have been and are. There is no
change under Biden. He, too, is Rhodesist, as his predecessors have been.
On December 3rd, the New York Times bannered “Iran Nuclear Talks Head for
Collapse Unless Tehran Shifts, Europeans Say: In Vienna talks, the new
hard-line Iranian government has staked out positions that are incompatible
with the 2015 deal, European negotiators say.” It lied to imply that
“the new hard-line Iranian government” was any different in its negotiating
position than its predecessor’s, which was: Iran was demanding that the U.S.
Government, which had broken the Agreement by cancelling its commitments under
it, must first rejoin that Agreement, before Iran would
make any concessions that would be in addition to that
Agreement; and any such additional concessions by Iran (such
as Trump and then Biden were demanding) would then be made ONLY in trade for
additional concessions becoming simultaneously made by the U.S. Government. The
EU (which essentially had been part of that existing Agreement the U.S. had
abandoned) is a Rhodesist vassal entity, and Biden is just as much of a
Rhodesist as was Trump before him, and even more than Obama was before Trump.
America’s billionaires get the U.S. Presidents that they’ve bought (which is
all of them post-1944), but it’s all actually part of the restored UK
empire, in accord with Cecil Rhodes’s plan. That is the U.S. Deep State,
and the UK Deep State, and the Israeli Deep State. And the Deep State in all of
the vassal-nations.
—————
Investigative historian Eric Zuesse is the
author of They’re Not
Even Close: The Democratic vs. Republican Economic Records, 1910-2010, and of CHRIST’S
VENTRILOQUISTS: The Event that Created Christianity.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.