The Kremlin’s Strategic
Blunders Are Leading to War
The Kremlin’s Strategic Blunders Are Leading to War
Paul Craig Roberts
While US Whore Media and
Whore “scientists” dependent on Fauci-controlled NIH and Big Pharma grants whip
up fear over a relatively harmless “Omicron variant,” a real dangerous
situation that I have anticipated for seven years is raising its deadly head.
The arrogant fools in
Washington lost in their own hubris have been practicing nuclear attacks on
Russia within 20 kilometers of Russia’s borders. Russian Defense
Minister Sergei Shoigu announced that Washington’s operation Global
Thunder rehearsed launching nuclear weapons against Russia from both western
and eastern directions.
Russian President Vladimir
Putin said that Washington was not taking seriously Moscow’s warning not to
cross Russia’s red lines.
Putin is correct. But
it is the Kremlin’s fault.
The only decisive action the
Kremlin has taken in response to intense provocations from Washington and NATO
was the Kremlin’s decision to accept the overwhelming vote of the people in
Crimea to be reincorporated into Russia where the territory had resided for 300
years. The Kremlin’s alternative was to lose Russia’s Black Sea navy
base.
In a strategic blunder of
the first magnitude, the Kremlin refused the same plea from the Russian people
in the Donetsk and Luhansk republics, territories that also had been
part of Russia for centuries. By refusing to honor the vote of the
Donbass Russians to again be a part of Russia, the Kremlin subjected them to
war and destruction by the Ukrainian army and various neo-nazi Ukrainian
militias. If the Kremlin had accepted the vote of the Donbass
Russians to be returned to Russia, the conflict would have ended as Ukraine
would not destroy itself by attacking Russian territory. Without the
ongoing conflict, Washington would have been unable to continue its machinations
against Russia in Ukraine.
In an effort to salvage the
situation, the Kremlin put together the “Minsk Agreement,” which Western powers
were to support, but didn’t. Thus, the conflict has continued to
smolder since 2014, providing Washington with 7 years to use anti-Russian
propaganda to define the narrative.
The Kremlin’s passivity and
attempt to rely on agreements with the US and NATO to resolve a Ukrainian
situation that Washington most certainly does not want resolved has convinced
Washington and NATO Secretary Jens Stoltenberg that there is no fight in
Russia, thus producing the situation that I have feared: Washington
has concluded that Russia’s red lines are merely rhetoric.
Many other Kremlin failures
have contributed to this dangerous outcome. The Kremlin still
permits Israel to attack Syrian territory when one telephone call from Putin is
sufficient to halt the attacks. The Kremlin still permits the
occupation of a small part of Syria by US troops and CIA Arab mercenaries
hostile to the Syrian state. The Kremlin receives massive insults to
the Russian president and still refers to those insulting Russia as “our
Western partners.”
These are not responses that
create the impression that there is any force behind the Kremlin’s red line.
The Kremlin has also failed
miserably in anticipating Washington’s moves, indicating an incompetent
intelligence service or a willing disbelief in the Kremlin of Russian
intelligence reports. Despite its obviousness, the Kremlin failed to
anticipate the invasion of South Ossetia in 2008 by a US and Israeli-trained
and equipped Georgian army. Putin was at the summer Olympics in
Beijing. The Kremlin failed to anticipate Washington’s obvious
overthrow of the democratically elected government of Ukraine and the replacement
of a Russia-friendly regime with a neo-nazi regime. Putin was at the Sochi
Olympics.
Washington simply will not
take seriously a government incapable of paying attention to what is happening
to its interests in its own backyard.
One might think that the
Kremlin would learn by experience, but apparently not. With reports that half
of the Ukrainian army is in the Donbass region threatening the Russian
inhabitants, US Secretary of State Blinken threatens Russia with “serious
consequences” if Russia protects the Donbass Russians.
Imagine, a cipher like
Blinken, a person of no ability or accomplishments, a representative of a
second-rate military power that discriminates against its own white troops,
issuing threats to the world’s dominant military force. This is
hubris run amuck, hubris encouraged by years of Kremlin low-key response to
major provocations. As I have warned, the low-key Russian response,
despite its good intention, encourages more provocations, and sooner or later
Washington will go too far and cross a red line that will force a Russian
military response. My fear of nuclear war is the reason for my
warning that Russia needs to put a strong foot down in order to stop the
progression of provocations that can only end in war.
Why has the Kremlin been so
meek in response to insults and provocations? I have no inside
information. The speculations are that (1) the Kremlin wants the
Donbass Russians to remain in Ukraine in order to water down the influence of
anti-Russian attitudes in Western Ukraine; (2) the Kremlin did not
want to confirm Washington’s propaganda that Russia was rebuilding the Soviet
Empire by reabsorbing the Donbass Russians in addition to Crimea; (3)
westernized Russian intellectuals have more confidence in the West than in
their government; (4) the Atlanticist Integrationists desire to be
part of the West than to be allied with China; (5) the Kremlin
thinks that by continuing to be low-key and open to cooperation with the West
all difficulties will be resolved; (6) Russia knows the horrors of
war and wants to avoid war at all costs; (7) Russian billionaire
oligarchs want the West as a haven for their stolen wealth.
All of these are sound
reasons as far as they go. The problem is that all of these reasons
ignore that Russia is Washington’s enemy of choice. Russia
is the enemy that justifies the $1,000 billion annual budget of the US
military/security complex. Russia is the enemy that strengthens
Washington’s hold on NATO and Washington’s European empire. Russia is the enemy
that keeps the Washington-abused American population loyal to the government
that is destroying American liberty. Russia is the enemy that can be
blamed, along with China, for every failure of Washington. How can
the Kremlin forget that the hostility of the American Elite to Russia is so
overwhelming that President Trump was confronted with a CIA/FBI/Justice
Department orchestrated “Russiagate” for simply stating that he intended to
restore normal relations with Russia?
Normal relations with Russia
are impermissible to the extent that a President of the United States was
removed from office in a stolen election after trumped-up “Russiagate” and
“Impeachgate” attempts failed. To complete the lesson to all future
presidents that normal relations with Russia are impermissible, Trump
supporters are being prosecuted for attending a rally in support of Trump, a
rally now known as “the Trump Insurrection.” Six hundred innocent
people are held in prison in violation of habeas corpus and First Amendment
rights. Not even the US Constitution can protect them.
And this is a government
that the Kremlin thinks it can reach an accommodation with !
God help the Russians and
all of us as Washington’s provocations continue their march to war.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.