What Is Blocking a Peace-Agreement Between Putin & Zelensky
Eric Zuesse, March 22, 2022
On Monday, 21 March, AP reported that “Zelenskyy said that Kyiv will be
ready to discuss the status of Crimea and the eastern Donbas region held by
Russian-backed separatists after a cease-fire and steps toward providing
security guarantees.” This milestone is the very first time that Zelensky has
said that there might be circumstances under which “the status of Crimea and
the eastern Donbas region held by Russian-backed separatists” could even
possibly be negotiated by Ukraine’s government. All Ukrainian-government leaders,
after U.S. President Barack Obama perpetrated in Ukraine a violent coup which
overthrew Ukraine’s democratically elected President and installed a
U.S.-controlled rabidly anti-Russian government in Ukraine in February 2014,
have said that Ukraine will never consider the status of those two former
regions of Ukraine to be negotiable.
So: Zelensky is now saying that “after a cease-fire and steps toward
providing security guarantees,” Zelensky would negotiate “the status of Crimea
and the eastern Donbas region held by Russian-backed separatists.” This is the
first major change-in-position by EITHER side in the present conflict, and the
fact that it is being made by Ukraine is indisputable proof that militarily
Russia is winning the war.
In other words: after a “cease-fire,” Ukraine would be in the weaker
position, and, in that position, would then find itself obligated (by what
Zelensky has just now said on this matter) to negotiate its acceptance that
neither of those two regions is any longer a part of Ukrainian territory.
Ukraine’s government would then be demanding from Russia’s Government “security
guarantees.” Ukraine’s government would be requiring these “security
guarantees” no longer from the U.S. Government (NATO), but instead from
Russia’s Government.
Russia’s Government had invaded Ukraine on February 24th for two reasons:
(1) to permanently block Ukrainian membership for Ukraine in the anti-Russian
military alliance NATO; and, (2) to “denazify” Ukraine. The current
breakthrough (“Zelenskyy said that Kyiv will be ready to discuss the status of
Crimea and the eastern Donbas region held by Russian-backed separatists after a
cease-fire and steps toward providing security guarantees”) opens the door to
achieving (1); however, the deeper, and continuing deadlock is (2)
denazification of Ukraine. In my news-report on March 21, “Why The Question Of
Which Side Is ‘nazi’ Blocks Any Peace Settlement”, was explained WHY that issue
is so extremely unlikely to be able to be agreed-upon between Zelensky and
Putin — and, therefore, why Russia will either have to accept defeat in this
war, or else defeat Ukraine 100% militarily before there will be any
capitulation by Ukraine in this conflict.
Since we now know that Russia is, at present, winning the war, the ONLY
possibility by which Ukraine will be able to impose capitulation on Russia is
by reversing the current military reality.
In any case, however, this is an extremely interesting situation. If
Russia wins this conflict, then the post-World-War-II domination of the world
by the United States will have definitively ended. However, if Ukraine wins it,
then Russia will have to accept that, ultimately, it will become conquered by
the U.S., and that the only agency remaining for Russia’s Government will be to
decide whether that defeat will come by a peaceful capitulation, or, instead,
by a world-annihilating WW III.
—————
Investigative historian Eric Zuesse’s next book (soon to be published)
will be AMERICA’S EMPIRE OF EVIL: Hitler’s Posthumous Victory, and Why the
Social Sciences Need to Change. It’s about how America took over the world
after World War II in order to enslave it to U.S.-and-allied billionaires.
Their cartels extract the world’s wealth by control of not only their ‘news’
media but the social ‘sciences’ — duping the public.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.