By
-
May 4,
2018
Hilda Murrell (L) and Andrew George
(R)
For
many, the questions of who brutally murdered a 78-year-old rose-grower turned
anti-nuclear campaigner outside her home town of Shrewsbury, England 34-years
ago, and why, lack any satisfactory resolution, more than three decades after
the tragic event. Speaking exclusively to Sputnik, her nephew Robert Green
updates Kit Klarenberg on his search for the truth.
On the
morning of March 21 1984, Hilda Murrell was preparing to make a presentation to the Sizewell
B Inquiry, the first public planning investigation into the launch of a new
nuclear power plant in the UK.
A
lifelong environmentalist, over the previous decade she’d become extremely
concerned about hazards posed by nuclear power in both its energized and
weaponized forms, and campaigned with ever-increasing fervor against its
proliferation.
Hilda’s
presentation was prepared with support from dissident scientists and activists,
and offered expert insight on the risks posed by nuclear power and radioactive
waste management.
Concerned
attendees sat in the inquiry’s public gallery were likely much looking forward
to her testimony, while many in the British nuclear industry were conversely no
doubt dreading it, for much the same reasons – despite Hilda’s age, she was a
formidable figure who commanded respect, and whose views demanded
consideration.
Hilda Murrell gives a speech in her garden,
1972 © Robert Green
Destiny
Betrayed
The
presentation would never come to pass. At around noon that day, Hilda’s home
was broken into and she was abducted – apparently in her own car. The vehicle
was later found abandoned in a country lane, five miles outside the town –
three days later, her mutilated body was found by police in a copse a field
away from her car.
Hilda
had been beaten and stabbed multiple times before being left to die from
hypothermia sometime later. The resultant police investigation produced no
leads or suspects – at least officially – and was widely criticized as
negligent and superficial.
Officers
concluded Hilda disturbed an individual burglarizing her home, who then
attacked and kidnapped her. In December that year, the delayed inquest into
Hilda’s murder – at which only the doctor who carried out her autopsy, who
later had his license revoked, and the local Detective Chief Superintendent,
were permitted to give statements – reinforced this narrative, ignoring serious
anomalies in the process, such as strong suggestions Hilda’s body had been
moved after her death.
Alternative
theories quickly proliferated among Hilda’s friends and family, the media and
even members of parliament. Most commonly, it was suggested she was murdered
due to her prominent anti-nuclear activities and opposition to the 1982
Falklands War – whether by individuals acting on behalf of the industry, or
members of the security services. The latter theory was ardently supported by
Labour MP Tam Dalyell, who repeatedly raised the issue in the House of Commons.
“Whoever
was in [Hilda’s] house had clearly been looking for something. [It] had been
carefully searched and her papers gone through in an orderly manner. Her
telephone had been cut off in such a way that, although it was dead from inside
the house, anyone calling would hear it ringing out. The police agree that is a
sophisticated way of doing things – not the actions of a common burglar taking
a chance. I am certain persons in Westminster and Whitehall know a great deal
more about the violent death of Hilda Murrell than they have so far been
prepared to divulge,” Dalyell said December 19 1984.
Ever since, the intrepid rose-grower has rarely strayed very far from public
consciousness. Her case has been dissected and immortalized in books,
documentaries, plays and films, and as of 2018, it remains an enduring mystery,
perhaps the most bizarre and baffling murder in the history of 20th century
Britain – despite the conviction in May 2005 of Andrew George for Hilda’s
abduction and murder.
Innocent
Man Framed
George,
a laborer in Shrewsbury who at the time of her killing was a 16-year-old truant
from a foster home who couldn’t drive, was arrested June 2003 after a police
review uncovered DNA and fingerprint evidence linking him with the crime. At
his trial, he admitted being in Hilda’s house, but denied abducting or
murdering her. The jury didn’t believe him, and he was sentenced to life
imprisonment with a recommended minimum term of 15 years.
Many,
however, do believe George – among them Robert Green, a noteworthy anti-nuclear campaigner in
his own right. He believes George – “a petty thief kind to old people” – was
unjustly incarcerated, and DNA evidence withheld from the jury would not only
likely acquit him, but establish beyond reasonable doubt at least one other
male, whom Hilda scratched, and possibly another whose semen was on her
cardigan, were involved in her murder.
Robert
believes MI5 and/or the nuclear industry, with potential assistance from a
private security agency, abducted Hilda and took her to a ‘safe house’ to
interrogate her and retrieve any sensitive information she may have possessed,
then identify its sources and neutralize them – but not before permanently
silencing and disposing of her.~
“Years
ago I met a former IRA member, who said the abduction strongly echoed ‘snatch
squad’ operations in Northern Ireland – the victim would be taken away for
interrogation while someone disguised as the victim was driven in their own car
as publicly as possible, to cause confusion and distract attention from
abductors. The operation was made to look botched and amateurish – the cover of
a bungling, sexually perverted burglar would help discredit any notion of state
involvement.”
Robert Green
Hilda’s Nephew
Chillingly,
the former IRA operative later suggested such snatch squads were occasionally
housed at Sir John Moore Army Barracks in central Shrewsbury – not far from
Hilda’s home. A 28th anniversary meeting in the town yielded
yet further troubling revelations. After the meeting, a man said his friend had
explosive information to impart, but was too nervous to talk because he was
subject to the Official Secrets Act.
He said
that early on the morning of March 21 1984, his friend had been helping guard
the main gate of RAF Shawbury, not far from where Hilda was found. Four Dutch
or Swiss agents who spoke perfect English came out of the base having been
flown in. Claiming to be electrical engineers, they were “muscly, fit and scary
to look at'” and spent no time in the base where they were supposed to be
working. They returned four days later and were flown out. Moreover, he alleged
the nearby Sundorne Territorial Army Centre, which was closed on dates
coinciding with Hilda’s abduction and the discovery of her body, was where she
was held.
“My wife
Kate was also approached outside the meeting by a man pointing to state
involvement in Hilda’s murder. Now we have to contend with the possibility she
possessed information far more damaging to the Thatcher government than
anything we previously knew about, possibly unrelated to the nuclear industry
and/or Falklands War. Could this information threaten even the current
government? That might explain all the extraordinary attention we continue to
experience,” Robert told Sputnik.
Harassment,
Murder…
As a
result of his attempts to bring his findings to public attention, Robert has
been subjected to concerted harassment and surveillance by security services in
both the UK and New Zealand, where he currently lives – a campaign that stepped
up significantly when he began researching and writing A Thorn In Their Side, his book about the case.
He and
his wife’s mail has been frequently opened, damaged, redirected or even lost
outright, and their home repeatedly broken in to and monitored from the outside
by a variety of vehicles.
In 2008,
as Robert and his wife prepared to leave for Europe to research his book, they
warned a skeptical house-sitter about this barrage of intrusion – later that
night, as the house-sitter returned to the house, he saw a man silhouetted by
torchlight through the living room window. When he finally entered the house ,
there was no sign of forced entry, and nothing had seemingly been taken.
Subsequently, the house-sitter noticed a car parked outside the house several
times. On the final occasion, when he parked behind it one evening and got out
to challenge the driver, the car shot off at high speed.
Some
harassment in the UK has been even more sinister. In February 2008, for
example, he and his wife were staying at a pub. At 1.30am one night, he and his
wife were woken by an intruder trying to unlock their bedroom door – a peep
through the keyhole revealed a large tracksuited man. Alerted, the individual
fled the scene in an unmarked white van equipped with aerials, which had been
parked across the street since they arrived.
Robert and his wife Kate hold damaged
parcels © Robert Green
Robert
isn’t alone. He has documented the harassment and even murder of other
whistleblowers who spoke out about contentious nuclear issues, or attempted to
supply him with sensitive information.
For
example, Dr. Rosalie Bertell, an American researcher for the
National Cancer Institute, discovered in 1977 low radiation levels caused
leukaemia and other health problems. When she spoke out about her findings, she
experienced severe harassment, including attempts on her life.
Dr. Patricia Sheehan, an Irish scientist, discovered in the
1980s mothers of children in Dundalk born with Down’s syndrome had all been at
a boarding school in 1957 when a fire in Windscale in Cumbria, northwest
England, released radioactive fallout which was blown across the Irish Sea. In
1994, as she was preparing to present her findings to an inquiry into birth
defects at Sellafield, Dr. Sheehan was found dead in her car, her papers
missing. The crash was never fully investigated.
Some
cases are closely connected with Hilda’s. Philip Griffith, whose adopted mother Eileen knew Hilda,
phoned Eileen from Brighton soon after the first anniversary of her murder to
report he’d overheard men in a pub bragging about how they’d killed her. He was
found by a work colleague early the next morning in a park dying of a drug
overdose. It took a fortnight for police to inform Eileen – when she identified
Philip’s body, he had a severe wound on his forehead, as if he’d been hit with
a hammer. Investigators dismissed his death as drug-related.
Willie MacRae, a leading radical lawyer, Scottish National
Party member and anti-nuclear campaigner – who’d often corresponded with Hilda
– was found in 1985 dying at the wheel of his car off a main road in the
Western Highlands with two bullet wounds in his head. His smashed wristwatch and
papers were found twenty yards from the car, and a gun further away in a
stream. His death was officially ruled a suicide, and no inquest was held. It
has been confirmed Willie was under surveillance by Special Branch at the time
of his death – and like Hilda, was preparing to give evidence at an inquiry
into the nuclear industry.
Despite
the barrage, Robert is determined to continue his efforts. In October 2017, he
submitted a ‘victim personal statement’ to the UK parole board, having learned
George could be paroled May 2018. He drew its attention to the updated 2013
edition of his book, summarized why he believed George was wrongly convicted,
and made clear he posed no threat to Hilda’s extended family. It would not be
until March 2018 that he was informed by his victim liaison officer that George
had been refused parole.
A little
over three years earlier, documents relating to Hilda’s murder were released
under the UK’s 30-year disclosure rule. Robert inspected and copied the heavily
redacted material, files which indicated “extraordinary concern and
involvement” in the case at senior government levels, including MI5. He later
found out two particular extracts from one file remain closed until January 1
2070. “All this,” Robert asks incredulously, “in a murder case where
authorities insist a lone teenage truant was responsible?
”
Robert holds secret Home Office file on the
case at the National Archives, Kew, UK in July 2017 © Robert Green
“The
case must be reopened and a proper inquiry established, led by a independent
person with no links to the British state security apparatus. Only such an
investigation can recommend how to prevent further corrupt, politicized abuse
of British justice and governance. Moreover, I hope my pursuit of the truth
about how and why Hilda died so violently will encourage others suspected of
suffering injustice at the hands of the British security authorities to come
forward.”
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.