May 13, 2020
U.S. and European Union
flags are pictured during the visit of Vice President Mike Pence to the
European Commission headquarters in Brussels, Belgium February 20, 2017.
REUTERS/Francois Lenoir - RTSZI3F
Virtually all other
industrialized countries have social-welfare systems in place, such as
health-insurance covering 100% of the population; and, consequently, the
residents there don’t lose their health insurance if they lose their job — they
therefore aren’t desperate to show up for work even when they are sick or can
spread an epidemic. Americans generally are desperate to go to work even
if they might be spreading the coronavirus-19. They need the pay and the
insurance coverage in order to be able to buy medical care. If they don’t pay
for it they won’t get it. So: whomever does show up for work might reasonably
be especially inclined to fear likely to catch the disease from a co-worker
there. This is one of the many reasons why socializing the healthcare function
is vastly more efficient than leaving it to market forces.
On April 23rd, Reuters reported that, “U.S. workers who refuse to return to
their jobs because they are worried about catching the coronavirus should not
count on getting unemployment benefits, state officials and labor law experts
say.” In such states, the unemployment-benefits system is being used as a
cudgel so as to force employees back to work, and therefore to increase the
percentage of the population who will become infected by the coronavirus-19.
Furthermore, prisons are
among the institutions that especially increase the spread of an epidemic such
as Covid-19. And the United States has a higher percentage of its residents in prison
than does any other country in the world. In fact, almost all of the Americans who are in
prison are poor (since 100% of the poor cannot afford a lawyer), and the poorer
a person is, the likelier that the individual is to get coronavirus-19. This is
yet another reason why prisons are a prime place for the spread of the disease.
And on April 26th, the New York Times headlined “As
Coronavirus Strikes Prisons, Hundreds of Thousands Are Released: The virus has spread rapidly in overcrowded
prisons across the world, leading governments to release inmates en masse.”
Since America has more of its population in prison than any other country does
(lots more: whereas “The world prison population rate,
based on United Nations estimates of national population levels, is 145 per
100,000”, America
has 655 per 100,000, or 4.5 prisoners for every 1.0 prisoner in the entire
world), America has vastly more production of coronavirus-19 that’s generated
by its being a police-state than any other country does — and this isn’t even
taking into consideration the rotten, overburdened, health-care system, and the
billionaire-propagandized public contempt for the poor, that characterize
America’s culture, and that make those prisons, perhaps, the worst amongst
industrialized nations. Furthermore, in America, “Approximately 95 percent of
criminal cases are plea-bargained, in part because public defenders are too
overwhelmed to take them to trial. ‘That means the state never even has to
prove you did anything. They hold all the cards.’” So, the Constitutional protections, such as
trial-by-jury and all of the other on-paper protections, don’t
even apply, in reality, to at least 95% of criminal defendants. And, in many
U.S. states, convicts — and even ex-convicts — aren’t allowed to
vote. America’s billionaires also use many other ways to keep down the
percentage of the poor who vote. Taken all together (and to list the other
details would fill a book), America’s systematized intense discrimination
against the poor constitutes virtually an invitation to this country’s having
exceptional vulnerability to any epidemic. The fact that America now has 33.3% of the world’s coronavirus-19
cases, though
only 4.2% of the world’s population, is actually systemic, and not merely
particular to this moment in this country, and in the entire world. Donald
Trump, and the current U.S. Congress, are part of a system of oppression, not
really exceptions to it (such as the billionaires’ media pretend — with
Democratic billionaires blaming “the Republicans,” and Republican billionaires
blaming “the Democrats”). The way this Government performs is actually
somewhat normal for this country since at least 1980.
In addition, prior to the
coronavirus challenge, both America and UK have been reducing, instead of
increasing, their social protections; and, therefore, they were the only
industrialized nations where life-expectancies were declining even before the
coronavirus-19 hit. The recognition and concern about this decline started in
UK, but has now started to be published even in the U.S.
British healthcare scholar
Danny Dorling headlined at his “Political Insight” blog on 16 July 2016, “Austerity, Rapidly Worsening Public
Health across the UK” and
reported that “the UK’s Office for National Statistics (ONS) released its
latest annual mortality figures – on schedule. An unprecedented rise
in mortality was reported which was revealed to have risen across all the
countries of the UK.” Then, on 8 July 2018, London’s Daily Express bannered “Britain is the ONLY European
country with a declining life expectancy – inquiry launched”. Then, on 8 March 2019, the blog of the British
Medical Journal headlined “The deepening health crisis in the
UK requires society wide, political intervention” and reported that UK’s life-expectancy had been
plunging since 2014. The BMJ then issued an article on 27
March 2020, “Things Fall Apart: the British
Health Crisis 2010–2020”. In other words: coronavirus hit UK at a time when the Government was
already moving away from socializing and into privatizing health care; and, as
a consequence, the death-rates had already started increasing in 2015.
Coronavirus kills mainly people who already have bad health; and, so, their
population were maximally vulnerable to it at the time when this epidemic
struck.
Political-science
studies that are based upon decades of reliably reported data have established that ever since around 1980,
the United States has been a dictatorship: what the public wants (and
even needs) is basically ignored, but what the super-rich (the
country’s actual dictators) simply want becomes reflected in governmental
policies. That’s the very definition of a “dictatorship.” The
U.S. national Government is responsive to the wants of its billionaires, not to
the needs of the public (such as protecting their health, education, and
welfare, even when the billionaires don’t want it to).The findings in one of
these studies are summarized well in a six-minute video, here. Although the
billionaires who fund America’s liberal Party, the Democratic Party, oppose the
billionaires who fund the Republican Party (the conservative Party — the one that’s overtly in
favor of the existing wealth-inequality), this is purely for PR purposes.
Whenever the issue becomes their own wealth versus improving the wealth and
economic opportunity for the poor, they all go for expanding their own empire
(sometimes by funding a tax-exempt ‘charity’ that will increase, even more,
their personal control over the total empire — by using that tax-exemption to
leverage the operation, which will be controlled by themselves instead of by
the public tax-funded government). Such ‘charities’ are mainly tax-dodges.
However, in all countries, the people who are the most vulnerable to epidemics
are the poor. This also means that the infection-rates and spreading of the
disease are the highest amongst the poorest. And, in this epidemic, the interests of
the super-rich are opposite to the interests of everybody else. And, since the U.S. Government has, for decades now,
been serving predominantly the super-rich, instead
of the public,
the people who are the most at risk are also the most ignored. This is even
proud policy (‘fiscal responsibility’, etc.) in the Republican Party.
Bailing-out investors is ‘necessary’, but bailing out employees and consumers
is ‘fiscally irresponsible’. For example, on April 27th, the Democrat David
Sirota headlined “Red States Owe Workers More Than
$500 Billion — The GOP Is Trying to Steal The Money: Trump is boosting a McConnell plan to help
states renege on promised retirement and health benefits to millions of workers
and retirees.” And he is correct. However, his Party is going to be
compromising with that (instead of adamantly refuse to accept
it and then go on the political hustings shaming the Republican President and
Congress-members so as to break them on their blatantly scandalous whoring to
the entire billionaire-class, who want their investments to be bailed out
before the public is — which might turn out to be never). It’s a “good cop, bad
cop,” routine, to protect the super-rich. It accepts holding the public hostage
to what the big political donors want, instead of focuses against that as being the
central political issue of the moment, and of at least post-1980 America.
This is the reason why
America is designed so as to fail the coronavirus-19 challenge. The power of
big-money (concentrated wealth) is destroying this country. It controls both
Parties and their respective media, so the public don’t know (and certainly
cannot understand) the types of realities that are being reported (and
linked-to) here. It’s also the reason why Joe Biden’s “plan” for dealing with
the coronavirus epidemic is just as bad a joke on the voters as Trump’s is. This is a failing
country, which is failing in a bipartisan (both Republican and Democratic
Party) way. A “good cop, bad cop” government is, in reality, all bad
cop. (I therefore proposed an Amendment to the U.S. Constitution in order to rectify some of the reasons behind
this structural failure of the U.S. Government. Perhaps the only alternative to
that would be violent revolution, but it would probably make things even worse,
not better.)
—————
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.