GIULIETTO CHIESA

WWIII

CROATIAN  ENGLISH   ESPAÑOL  GREEK  NEDERLANDS  POLSKI  PORTUGUÊS EU   PORTUGUÊS BR  ROMANIAN  РУССКИЙ

What part will your country play in World War III?

By Larry Romanoff, May 27, 2021

 

The true origins of the two World Wars have been deleted from all our history books and replaced with mythology. Neither War was started (or desired) by Germany, but both at the instigation of a group of European Zionist Jews with the stated intent of the total destruction of Germany. The documentation is overwhelming and the evidence undeniable. (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11)

         Read More

Manifestações

Friday, July 29, 2022

PT -- GRANDANGOLO -- Manlio Dinucci -- DRAGHI: MISSÃO CUMPRIDA

 

 


HOJE À NOITE EM GRANDANGOLO ÀS 20:30

CANAL DE TV NACIONAL 262 BYOBLU

 





DRAGHI:

MISSÃO CUMPRIDA

Manlio Dinucci

 

"De todos os países da Europa Ocidental, a Itália tinha um dos laços mais fortes com a Rússia. A missão de Draghi era quebrar este esquema, reposicionando a Itália em relação à Rússia", escreve o New York Times. Draghi não só transformou a Itália num país beligerante contra a Rússia, enviando armas e instrutores para as forças ucranianas, como também promoveu sanções contra o Banco Central russo e a admissão da Ucrânia na União Europeia. Para estes e outros "méritos", a revista americana Fortune inclui Mario Draghi entre "os 50 maiores líderes do mundo". 

 

A carreira de Draghi tomou um rumo decisivo quando - após o desmantelamento, como Director do Tesouro, do património público italiano com as privatizações - se tornou Director e Vice Presidente da Goldman Sachs. A Goldman Sachs não é só um banco americano, mas um centro de poder da elite financeira que, através da sua política de "porta giratória", coloca os seus homens em posições institucionais chave. De 2005 a 2021, Draghi tornou-se primeiro Governador do Banco de Itália, depois Presidente do Banco Central Europeu e, finalmente, Presidente do Conselho de Ministros da República Italiana.

 

Os resultados da "missão" que Draghi cumpriu com a cumplicidade total do Parlamento italiano mergulharam a Itália numa crise sem precedentes: enquanto o preço do gás (como resultado das políticas anti-russas) subiu de 15 para 200 euros por megawatt/hora, a Itália acumulou um nível de responsabilidades tal que - escreve a Fortune - "o custo do empréstimo para a Itália tornou-se proibitivo, subindo para níveis insustentáveis". A crise italiana é semelhante àquela em que a Grécia mergulhou, perdendo o que restava do seu património público com o "pacote de salvamento" da União Europeia. A situação é agravada pela desvalorização do euro face ao dólar, o que aumenta o custo das importações. Decisivo, portanto, é inverter a política que Draghi instituiu com a sua "missão" em Itália.

 

Manlio Dinucci

 

29 de Julho de 2022

 

FR -- GRANDANGOLO -- Manlio Dinucci -- Draghi : mission accomplie

 

 


CE SOIR EN GRANDANGOLO À 20:30

CHAÎNE DE TÉLÉVISION NATIONALE 262 BYOBLU

 


Draghi : mission accomplie

Manlio Dinucci

 

 

“Parmi les pays de l’Europe Occidentale l’Italie avait un des liens les plus forts avec la Russie. La mission de Draghi a été de rompre ce schéma en re-positionnant l’Italie à l’égard de la Russie”, écrit le New York Times. Draghi n’a pas seulement transformé l’Italie en pays belligérant contre la Russie, envoyant des armes et des instructeurs aux forces ukrainiennes, mais il a favorisé les sanctions contre la Banque centrale russe et l’admission de l’Ukraine dans l’UE. Pour ces mérites et quelques autres l’influente revue étasunienne Fortune inclut Mario Draghi parmi “les 50 plus grands leaders du monde”.

 

 

  La carrière de Draghi prend un tournant décisif quand -après avoir démantelé en tant que directeur du Trésor le patrimoine public italien par les privatisations- il devient directeur et vice-président de Goldman Sachs. Goldman Sachs n’est pas seulement une banque USA mais un centre du pouvoir du gotha financier qui, grâce à la politique du “pantouflage”, place ses hommes dans des charges institutionnelles clés. De 2005 à 2021 Draghi devient d’abord gouverneur de la Banque d’Italie puis président de la Banque Centrale Européenne, enfin président du Conseil des ministres de la République Italienne.

 

 

   Les résultats de la “mission” que Draghi a accomplie avec la complicité totale du Parlement font plonger l’Italie dans une crise sans précédents : pendant que le prix du gaz (à la suite des politiques anti-russes) a grimpé de 15 à 200 euros le mégawattheure, l’Italie a accumulé un tel niveau de passivité que -écrit Fortune- “le coût du crédit pour l’Italie est devenu prohibitif, atteignant des niveaux insoutenables”. La crise italienne est analogue à celle dans laquelle a plongé la Grèce, perdant avec le “plan de sauvetage” de l’UE ce qui restait du patrimoine public. La situation est aggravée par la dévaluation de l’euro face au dollar, qui accroit le coût des importations. Il est donc décisif de renverser la politique que Draghi a opérée avec sa “mission” en Italie.

 

 

Bref résumé de la revue de presse internationale de vendredi 29 juillet 2022 de Grandangolo Pangea à 20h30 sur la chaine italienne Byoblu

https://www.byoblu.com/category/grandangolo-pangea/

Reçu de l’auteur et traduit par Marie-Ange Patrizio

IT -- GRANDANGOLO -- Manlio Dinucci -- DRAGHI: MISSIONE COMPIUTA

 


STASERA SU GRANDANGOLO ALLE 20:30

CANALE TV NAZIONALE 262 BYOBLU

 

Der Banker Mario Draghi soll Italien vor dem Abgrund retten.

DRAGHI:

MISSIONE COMPIUTA

Manlio Dinucci

 

“Tra i paesi dell’Europa Occidentale l'Italia aveva uno dei legami più forti con la Russia. La missione di Draghi è stata quella di rompere questo schema, riposizionando l’Italia nei confronti della Russia”: lo scrive il New York Times. Draghi ha non solo trasformato l’Italia in paese belligerante contro la Russia, inviando armi e istruttori alle forze ucraine, ma ha promosso le sanzioni contro la Banca centrale russa e l’ammissione dell’Ucraina nella UE. Per questi e altri “meriti” l’autorevole rivista USA Fortune include Mario Draghi tra “i 50 più grandi leader del mondo”.  

 

La carriera di Draghi ha una svolta decisiva quando – dopo aver smantellato quale direttore del Tesoro il patrimonio pubblico italiano con le privatizzazioni – diviene direttore e vicepresidente della Goldman Sachs.  La Goldman Sachs non è solo una banca USA ma un centro di potere del gotha finanziario che, attraverso la politica delle “porte girevoli”, piazza i suoi uomini in cariche istituzionali chiave. Dal 2005 al 2021 Draghi diviene prima governatore della Banca d'Italia, quindi presidente della Banca Centrale Europea, infine presidente del Consiglio dei ministri della Repubblica Italiana.

 

I risultati della “missione” che Draghi ha compiuto con la totale complicità del Parlamento fanno sprofondare l’Italia in una crisi senza precedenti: mentre il prezzo del gas (in seguito alle politiche anti-russe) è salito da 15 a 200 euro al megawattora, l’Italia ha accumulato un livello tale di passività che – scrive Fortune – “il costo del prestito per l'Italia è diventato proibitivo, salendo a livelli insostenibili”. La crisi italiana è analoga a quella in cui sprofondò la Grecia, perdendo con il “pacchetto di salvataggio” della UE ciò che restava del patrimonio pubblico. La situazione è aggravata dalla svalutazione dell’euro nei confronti del dollaro, che accresce il costo delle importazioni. Decisivo, quindi, è ribaltare la politica che Draghi ha attuato con la sua “missione” in Italia. 

Manlio Dinucci

 

29 luglio 2022

Friday, July 15, 2022

FR -- PANGEA -- GRANDANGOLO -- MANLIO DINUCCI -- Sous peu en Italie Les nouvelles bombes nucléaires made in USA

 


   GRANDANGOLO   PANGEA   BYOBLU  

15 juillet 2022 à 20h30




Sous peu en Italie

Les nouvelles bombes nucléaires made in USA


Manlio Dinucci

 

 

“La production de la bombe nucléaire B61-12 commence” : annoncent depuis les États-Unis les Sandia National Laboratories. La B61-12, qui remplace la précédente B61 déployée par les USA à Aviano (Région Frioul-Vénétie-Julie) et Ghedi (Brescia) et dans d’autres bases européennes, est une arme d’un type nouveau. Elle a une tête nucléaire avec quatre options de puissance, sélectionnables en fonction de l’objectif à détruire. Elle n’est pas larguée à la verticale, mais à distance de l’objectif sur lequel elle se dirige guidée par un système satellite. Elle peut pénétrer dans le sous-sol, explosant en profondeur pour détruire les bunker des centres de commandement dans une première frappe (first strike) nucléaire. Les B61-12, classées comme “armes nucléaires non-stratégiques”, seront déployées en Europe -Italie, Allemagne, Belgique, Pays-Bas, Grande-Bretagne et probablement d’autres pays- à distance telles qu’elles peuvent toucher la Russie. Elles ont ainsi des capacités offensives analogues à celles des armes stratégiques.



   Un autre système d’arme nucléaire, que les États-Unis se préparent à installer en Europe contre la Russie, est constitué de missiles à portée intermédiaire avec base à terre. Ils peuvent être lancés aussi des installations “bouclier anti-missiles”, déployées par les USA dans les bases de Deveselu en Roumanie et de Redzikowo en Pologne, et depuis cinq navires de guerre qui croisent en Méditerranée, Mer Noire et Mer Baltique au bord de la Russie. confirmées par C’est le fabricant-même, Lockheed Martin, qui confirme les capacités offensives de ces installations. Illustrant les caractéristiques du système de lancement vertical Mk 41, utilisé à la fois dans les installations terrestres et navales, il précise que le système est en mesure de lancer ”des missiles pour toutes les missions, que ce soit pour la défense ou pour l’attaque à longue portée, y compris des missiles de croisière Tomahawk”. Ceux-ci peuvent être armés de têtes nucléaires.

 

  L’Europe se trouve ainsi transformée par les USA en première ligne de confrontation nucléaire avec la Russie, plus dangereuse encore que celle de la Guerre froide.

 

Bref résumé de la revue de presse internationale télévisée Grandangolo Pangea de Byoblu de vendredi 15 juillet 2022 à 20h30

https://www.byoblu.com/category/grandangolo-pangea/ Reçu de l’auteur et traduit par Marie-Ange Patrizio

 

EN -- PANGEA GRANDANGOLO (BYOBLU) -- Manlio Dinucci -- COMING SOON TO ITALY THE NEW NUCLEAR BOMBS MADE IN USA


 

GRANDANGOLO

AT 8:30 P.M. TODAY ON BYOBLU NATIONAL TV

Grandangolo can also be seen on live TV on mobile or computer at the site

https://www.byoblu.com/diretta-tv/

After the first broadcast, the Grandangolo episode can be viewed, along with previous ones, at

https://www.byoblu.com/category/grandangolo-pangea/

 


COMING SOON TO ITALY

THE NEW NUCLEAR BOMBS MADE IN USA

Manlio Dinucci

 

ENGLISH  FRANÇAIS   ITALIANO   PORTUGUÊS

 

 

"Production of the B61-12 nuclear bomb begins," Sandia National Laboratories announced from the United States. The B61-12, which replaces the previous B61 deployed by the U.S. at Aviano and Ghedi and other European bases, is a new type of weapon. It has a nuclear warhead with four power options, selectable depending on the target to be destroyed. It is not dropped vertically, but at a distance from the target on which it is directed guided by a satellite system. It can penetrate underground, exploding deep to destroy command center bunkers in a nuclear first strike.

 

The B61-12s, classified as "non-strategic nuclear weapons," are deployed in Europe -- in Italy, Germany, Belgium, the Netherlands, Britain and probably other countries -- at distances far enough to strike Russia. They thus have offensive capabilities similar to those of strategic weapons. 

 

Another nuclear weapon system, which the United States is preparing to install in Europe against Russia, is ground-based intermediate-range missiles. They can also be launched from "anti-missile shield" installations, deployed by the U.S. at bases in Deveselu in Romania and Redzikowo in Poland, and aboard five warships cruising in the Mediterranean, Black Sea and Baltic Sea close to Russia. 

 

That such installations have offensive capabilities is confirmed by Lockheed Martin itself. Outlining the characteristics of the Mk 41 vertical launch system, used in both land and naval installations, it specifies that it is capable of launching "missiles for all missions, both defense and long-range attack, including Tomahawk cruise missiles."   These can be armed with nuclear warheads.

 

Europe is thus being turned by the U.S. into the front line of a nuclear confrontation with Russia, even more dangerous than that of the Cold War.

Manlio Dinucci





July 15, 2022

Thursday, July 14, 2022

A MUST READ -- Eric Zuesse -- What U.S. Hegemony Is, How It Started, and When

What U.S. Hegemony Is, How It Started, and When

 

Eric Zuesse, July 14, 2022

 


 

 

An unquestioned assumption amongst America’s Establishment is that the global dominance that America inherited from having been the last of the major world powers to enter World War II, and from having suffered (by far) the least damage from that War, needs to continue in perpetuity, and that it needs to become total U.S. dominance over the entire planet, and especially dominance over the world’s largest nation, Russia, which is 1.77 times larger than America (the world’s third-largest country) is. (Russia is 1.74 times larger than Canada, the world’s second-largest country, is; and is 1.78 times larger than China, which is the world’s fourth-largest. It is 2.01 times larger than the 5th-largest, Brazil; and is 2.20 times larger than the 6th-largest, Australia. It is 5.20 times larger than the 7th-largest, India. So, there are only 6 giant countries: Russia, Canada, America, China, Brazil, and Australia.) The term that many scholars use to refer to this belief — this objective, that America’s dominance over the entire world would be good instead of bad — is “hegemony”. Here, this belief will be explained

 

Historically, any nation’s Establishment (its aristocracy and their employees and other agents) seeks to control as much of the world’s natural resources as possible, and this craving by them is the leading cause of wars. Russia, as the world’s largest nation, is also the world’s richest in natural resources. That is the main reason why the thousand-or-so people who control America (who mainly are America’s billionaires, America’s richest and best-connected individuals) want, more than anything else, to control Russia, which they don’t YET control. Their top mutually shared (virtually unanimous, if not 100% unanimous) assumption is that, however this is to be done, America needs to achieve control over Russia — that it is a good, instead of a bad, objective to pursue. If any member of America’s Establishment does NOT hold this objective, then that person would be shunned by all of his or her colleagues, and would consequently become targeted by all of them for defeat or conquest, destroying that person’s reputation and/or enterprises. Consequently, none comes forth publicly in opposition to this objective, which is called “U.S. hegemony” when it is not being labelled instead by benign-sounding ideological terms or phrases such as “democracy,” “freedom,” “the American way,” “the liberal international order,” or “the rules-based international order,” all of which presume that America’s continued and increased control over the world will help, instead of hinder, such alleged “values” — which really are global conquest, however that is to be achieved. So, the public join in: they (as workers for, or other agents of, those extremely wealthy individuals), likewise favor continued, and increased, U.S. global rule, hegemony. This goal is accepted by America’s public, as-if it were the very meaning of being an American ‘patriot’, and to oppose it is thus ‘unpatriotic’. This belief, in the virtuousness of extending yet further the American empire, is also the reason why the highest-respected of all institutions in America is “the military.”

 

Prior to 1898, America had been only a confused but largely democratic country, and not yet an imperialistic capitalist, or “fascist,” country, such as it has been ever since then, except during the Presidency of Franklin Delano Roosevelt (1933-1945), when America was — for only that brief time-span — the most fully democratic country that it has ever been. Almost immediately after WW II, America became, even more than it ever had been, an imperialistic capitalist country, effectively controlled by its military-industrial complex, which never before even had existed. This is the reason why U.S. President Harry S. Truman (inspired by the advice that he had received from his hero, Dwight David Eisenhower — “Ike” — the most gifted liar of anyone who became America’s President, except for Barack Obama) created, in 1947, both the U.S. Department of ‘Defense’ (America’s first-ever standing army — which had been condemned by America’s Founders, but Truman and the U.S. Congress dismissed that concern) and the CIA (for producing coups, which America started doing in 1948 Thailand).

 

Eric Zuesse -- The U.S. Government’s Fake Opposition to Global Warming

The U.S. Government’s Fake Opposition to Global Warming

 

Eric Zuesse, July 13, 2022

 


 

 

The U.S. Government is set to destroy America’s stockpile of thorium, which element is the likeliest source of safe nuclear energy, and is also the likeliest replacement of the fossil fuels that are increasingly threatening the world’s future if a uranium 235 and plutonium nuclear-bomb World War III won’t end the world before global burnout does. 

 

Some people think that a WW III is the world’s biggest threat; others think that a global burnout from fossil-fuels usage is. Thorium-based electricity could provide the solution to both concerns. But the U.S. Government has stunningly ignored thorium, because their top goal is to win control over the entire world (U.S. hegemony, an all-inclusive U.S. global empire), and only the uranium-based nuclear reactors produce feedstock to make nuclear bombs (for conquest), which is the U.S. Government’s top goal. So, their plan is simply to get rid of the thorium ‘waste’ from its nuclear industries. According to the narrative from the U.S. Government’s propagandists, “in 1973 the United States government shut down all thorium related nuclear research due to the success of the uranium reactor to produce energy, so the vast majority of the nuclear reactors that exists today use enriched uranium (U-235) or reprocessed plutonium (Pu-239) as their source of energy,” but the truth is quite otherwise: thorium-research was shut down because bomb-production was the real purpose of all nuclear development in the U.S., then, and now. They wanted more nuclear bombs. (Whereas bombs can be made from thorium producing uranium-233, it’s more difficult and far less suitable for major industrial-scale nuclear industries. As one 2011 engineering analysis concluded, thorium-based production of electricity would “have extraordinary proliferation resistance because thorium cannot be made directly into a weapon.5 The reactor cannot be used to create substantial, pure quantities of plutonium or 238U, which are needed to make bombs.2” Unfortunately, however, this is also why the U.S. Government has shunned it.)

 

America’s Government has built nuclear power upon the foundation of producing fission-bombs, nuclear weapons, which need U-235 and plutonium, that are required for large-scale bomb-making, instead of to build America’s nuclear-electricity production upon the basis of vastly safer thorium, which doesn’t explode. Thorium is being considered a mere ‘waste’, because it’s not useful for bomb-making (although thorium can do that on a small scale). China, by contrast, is racing past the U.S. to build-out mankind’s thorium electrical-production future, instead of to focus upon producing the biggest nuclear-weapons stockpiles like the U.S. and Russia have been doing (to make bombs for potential usage against each other). 

 

Fortunately, two U.S. Senators are now trying to block America’s planned destruction of its thorium stockpiles, which are residues from the production of nuclear weapons and from existing uranium-235-based nuclear electricity-generation. These two Senators want America, not China, to be leading the world into a far safer future. However, they do this not in order to prevent global burnout, nor to prevent a nuclear-war global holocaust, but, instead, in order to prevent a termination of U.S. global hegemony (U.S. rule over the entire world). Loss of U.S. global hegemony is what they are actually worrying about. They simply want America to beat China. It’s purely a competitive goal, for them — not actually a mankind goal (which it is in China): to reduce global warming.

 

On 23 April 2006, the thorium-reactor expert Kirk Sorensen’s blog, “Energy From Thorium” headlined “Don’t throw away U233!”, and he wrote:

 

When I learned that the entire National Defense Stockpile of thorium (3216 metric tonnes) was slated for burial in the Nevada desert, that was bad enough. But the destruction of our U233 really breaks my heart and hurts so much worse.

Uranium-233 is the ideal fuel to start a liquid-fluoride reactor, and there is a very little bit in the world, left over from different attempts to get a thorium-powered future going. Now the DOE is taking great pride in the fact they are going to throw it away. I can only comfort myself with the idea that if they knew how valuable this material is for starting a liquid-fluoride reactor, they would never do this.

It gets even worse – the $128 million that they plan to spend to “blend” down this little bit of U-233 could be used to progress liquid-fluoride reactors, which currently get about $40K a year under the DOE Gen-4 program. The fellow that gets the money tells me it’s enough to “answer the phone”.

And once blended with U-238, the U-233 will be unrecoverable (I’m sure this is what they want). We could not isotopically separate it like natural uranium, since it will be far, far too radioactive to introduce into a diffusion plant. So it’s gone – thrown away when it could have started a thorium reactor.

What a tragic loss and waste.

 

This wasn’t a problem only of the war-mongering George W. Bush U.S. Presidency, which then was in power. It’s instead bipartisan in Washington. Thus, journalist Ambrose Evans Pritchard, in Britain’s Telegraph, bannered, on 29 August 2010, “Obama could kill fossil fuels overnight with a nuclear dash for thorium: If Barack Obama were to marshal America’s vast scientific and strategic resources behind a new Manhattan Project, he might reasonably hope to reinvent the global energy landscape and sketch an end to our dependence on fossil fuels within three to five years.”. He meant it seriously, and he wondered why America hadn’t already initiated such a “Manhattan Project II,” in order to put the environmentalist rhetoric of Obama, and of other American liberals, into an authentically promising means of actually achieving their asserted environmentalist objective against global warming. He closed by saying, “If it works, Manhattan II could restore American optimism and strategic leadership at a stroke: if not, it is a boost for US science and surely a more fruitful way to pull the US out of perma-slump than scattershot stimulus. Even better, team up with China and do it together, for all our sakes.” However, twelve more years of “stimulus” (without much stimulation) were yet to pass, before even just two U.S. Senators decided to team up together so as to push that idea through, but not cooperatively, with China (such as that journalist had proposed) — but instead as a means of beating China, so as to maintain America’s continuing global hegemony, against China and Russia. (The U.S. Government has actually been secretly continuing its Cold War even after the Soviet Union and its communism ended in 1991. The U.S. Government’s actual enemy wasn’t communism: it turned out to have been Russia and any other resistant nation; the Cold War, on America’s side, was America’s war against all nations — to control all of them. That’s just a historical fact. Communism was just an excuse.)

 

On 18 May 2022, U.S. Senator Tommy Tuberville headlined a press release, “Tuberville, Marshall Introduce Bill to Save Clean, Safe Nuclear Power”, and he announced:

 

U.S. Senator Tommy Tuberville (R-AL), a member of the Senate Armed Services Committee, and Senator Roger Marshall (R-KS), a member of the Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources, today introduced the Thorium Energy Security Act to prevent the destruction of Uranium 233 (U-233), a critical element used to produce clean energy.

“Thorium and U-233 hold the promise to produce clean, safe power and are vital to our national security. Energy will continue to be at the heart of global conflicts, so the United States must invest in energy technology,” Senator Tuberville said. “China clearly saw the value in our thorium research — they’ve taken up where we left off, and we may soon see thorium-powered Chinese aircraft carriers and thorium reactors on the Belt & Road courtesy of American technology.” 

“Uranium-233 is too valuable and too useful to just be thrown in the trash, a fact that the Chinese Communist Party understands but our Department of Energy clearly does not. While we are spending millions of dollars to destroy U-233, the CCP is investing in it by preparing to build a new generation of advanced aircraft carriers and nuclear reactors powered by U-233,” said Senator Marshall. “The United States needs to lead on advanced nuclear reactors and not leave the future of innovative clean energy technologies in the hands of China. Preserving this valuable national resource is the first step on that path.” 

BACKGROUND:

In the 1960s, the United States pioneered thorium molten salt breeder reactor technologies at Oak Ridge National Labs. This promising technology, which employed uranium 233 (U-233), produced clean, safe power, but did not produce plutonium like other reactor designs. As our country was focused on growing our nuclear arsenal, the U.S. shelved thorium and U-233 for decades.

In 2001, the Department of Energy began the process of destroying our stocks of U-233. ...

 

Since then, their bill has been bottled-up being considered in the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee. After these decades of the U.S. Government’s trying to find a way to ditch thorium as mere waste because it’s not useful for making nuclear bomb-heads, because it doesn’t explode, our Government might at last start to put it to use replacing fossil fuels, which goal, for this Government, has, thus far, been only a rhetorical matter, in order for liberal politicians to appeal to their snookered voters (who don’t recognize the difference between mere rhetoric versus actual intentions), not something that liberal politicians ever actually cared about or intended to solve. (Of course, conservative politicians have instead been saying that human-created global warming doesn’t even exist, that it’s just a hoax. Their voters don’t even care about the environment, and the future — not even about their own descendants.)

 

According to the World Nuclear Association, “The use of thorium as a new primary energy source has been a tantalizing prospect for many years. Extracting its latent energy value in a cost-effective manner remains a challenge, and will require considerable R&D investment. This is occurring preeminently in China, with modest US support.” The near future will actually decide whether America trashes its thorium, or instead will use it to compete against China.

 

According to a 2011 article published by the American Chemical Society, “Should We Consider Using Liquid Fluoride Thorium Reactors for Power Generation?”:

 

Thorium is four times more abundant than uranium and naturally occurs in only one isotope, 232Th, eliminating all enrichment activities inherent in uranium mining and processing. … [In order to operate a thorium reactor,] there is a start-up load of approximately 1.5 tons of fissile material, such as 235U, 238U, or 239Pu, after which the reactor thermally breeds 233U [by constant feeding of the 100% thorium fuel feedstock, into the reactor] to maintain fission [the reactor’s energy-production]. Conventional nuclear reactors [which use 100% U-235 as their fuel feedstock] need 510 times more initial material [enriched uranium] to start and continuous feeding of enriched uranium.1 Perpetually needing to transport enriched uranium presents proliferation risks. Thorium by itself does not pose proliferation risks and presents a much smaller radiation risk.

 

Recently, Sorensen delivered a 10-minute TED-talk explaining why thorium-based nuclear-based energy will be the world’s future. Finally, the idea that he’s been championing for twenty years is starting to get some traction in war-mongering Washington DC — the world’s global-imperialist capital. Finally, something serious might be afoot to halt global warming, but its motivation is instead to keep the U.S. Government in control over all nations — so as not to lose America’s hegemony. It’s a “national security” matter, to America’s Government: to remain “Number 1” (regardless of whether doing so might actually be endangering both America’s, and the entire world’s, national security, thus threatening everybody’s safety). That’s what it’s really about. All of the liberals’ rhetoric about stopping global warming has merely been PR cover for bomb-making and continuing America’s global hegemony, nothing serious to stop global warming.

 

The only possible competitor to thorium as an ecologically friendly electrical energy source is generally thought to be nuclear fusion, but that has always been unlikely and now seems to be even more unlikely than before. On 23 June 2022, Science magazine headlined “Out of gas: A shortage of tritium fuel may leave fusion energy with an empty tank”, and explained why the feasibility of ever achieving a fusion reactor is looking smaller the more that the barriers to achieving it are becoming scientifically understood. That’s the exact opposite of the prospects for achieving thorium fission reactors. Thorium seems to be the only practicable way to avoid global catastrophe. 

 

 

The U.S. Government’s obsession for global hegemony has been threatening everybody, everywhere. Either it will end, or else the world will end, maybe even within our own lifetimes — especially if the U.S. Government’s grasping for global hegemony will produce WW III. The U.S. Government is global warming’s friend, and everybody’s enemy. Will that change? Nothing yet indicates it will. But perhaps China or some other country will pull us all through this perilous historical moment.

 

—————

 

Investigative historian Eric Zuesse’s next book (soon to be published) will be AMERICA’S EMPIRE OF EVIL: Hitler’s Posthumous Victory, and Why the Social Sciences Need to Change. It’s about how America took over the world after World War II in order to enslave it to U.S.-and-allied billionaires. Their cartels extract the world’s wealth by control of not only their ‘news’ media but the social ‘sciences’ — duping the public.

 

2007 Speech

UKRAINE ON FIRE

Discurso do Presidente da Rússia, Vladimir Putin, na manhã do dia 24 de Fevereiro de 2022

Discurso do Presidente da Rússia, Vladimir Putin, Tradução em português




Presidente da Rússia, Vladimir Putin: Cidadãos da Rússia, Amigos,

Considero ser necessário falar hoje, de novo, sobre os trágicos acontecimentos em Donbass e sobre os aspectos mais importantes de garantir a segurança da Rússia.

Começarei com o que disse no meu discurso de 21 de Fevereiro de 2022. Falei sobre as nossas maiores responsabilidades e preocupações e sobre as ameaças fundamentais que os irresponsáveis políticos ocidentais criaram à Rússia de forma continuada, com rudeza e sem cerimónias, de ano para ano. Refiro-me à expansão da NATO para Leste, que está a aproximar cada vez mais as suas infraestruturas militares da fronteira russa.

É um facto que, durante os últimos 30 anos, temos tentado pacientemente chegar a um acordo com os principais países NATO, relativamente aos princípios de uma segurança igual e indivisível, na Europa. Em resposta às nossas propostas, enfrentámos invariavelmente, ou engano cínico e mentiras, ou tentativas de pressão e de chantagem, enquanto a aliança do Atlântico Norte continuou a expandir-se, apesar dos nossos protestos e preocupações. A sua máquina militar está em movimento e, como disse, aproxima-se da nossa fronteira.

Porque é que isto está a acontecer? De onde veio esta forma insolente de falar que atinge o máximo do seu excepcionalismo, infalibilidade e permissividade? Qual é a explicação para esta atitude de desprezo e desdém pelos nossos interesses e exigências absolutamente legítimas?

Read more

ARRIVING IN CHINA

Ver a imagem de origem

APPEAL


APPEAL TO THE LEADERS OF THE NINE NUCLEAR WEAPONS' STATES

(China, France, India, Israel, North Korea, Pakistan, Russia, the United Kingdom and the United States)

中文 DEUTSCH ENGLISH FRANÇAIS ITALIAN PORTUGUESE RUSSIAN SPANISH ROMÂNA

manlio + maria

MOON OF SHANGHAI site

LR on CORONAVIRUS

LARRY ROMANOFF on CORONAVIRUS

Read more at Moon of Shanghai

World Intellectual Property Day (or Happy Birthday WIPO) - Spruson ...


Moon of Shanghai

L Romanoff

Larry Romanoff,

contributing author

to Cynthia McKinney's new COVID-19 anthology

'When China Sneezes'

When China Sneezes: From the Coronavirus Lockdown to the Global Politico-Economic Crisis

manlio

James Bacque

BYOBLU

irmãos de armas


Subtitled in PT, RO, SP

Click upon CC and choose your language.


manlio

VP




Before the Presidential Address to the Federal Assembly.



The President of Russia delivered
the Address to the Federal Assembly. The ceremony took
place at the Manezh Central Exhibition Hall.


January
15, 2020


vp

President of Russia Vladimir Putin:

Address to the Nation

Address to the Nation.

READ HERE


brics


Imagem

PT -- VLADIMIR PUTIN na Sessão plenária do Fórum Económico Oriental

Excertos da transcrição da sessão plenária do Fórum Económico Oriental

THE PUTIN INTERVIEWS


The Putin Interviews
by Oliver Stone (
FULL VIDEOS) EN/RU/SP/FR/IT/CH


http://tributetoapresident.blogspot.com/2018/07/the-putin-interviews-by-oliver-stone.html




TRIBUTE TO A PRESIDENT


NA PRMEIRA PESSOA

Um auto retrato surpreendentemente sincero do Presidente da Rússia, Vladimir Putin

CONTEÚDO

Prefácio

Personagens Principais em 'Na Primeira Pessoa'

Parte Um: O Filho

Parte Dois: O Estudante

Parte Três: O Estudante Universitário

Parte Quatro: O Jovem especialista

Parte Cinco: O Espia

Parte Seis: O Democrata

Parte Sete: O Burocrata

Parte Oito: O Homem de Família

Parte Nove: O Político

Apêndice: A Rússia na Viragem do Milénio


contaminação nos Açores



Subtitled in EN/PT

Click upon the small wheel at the right side of the video and choose your language.


convegno firenze 2019