GIULIETTO CHIESA

FREE JULIAN ASSANGE

WWIII + S SITE

 

CROATIAN   ENGLISH   GREEK   NEDERLANDS   POLSKI   PORTUGUESE   ROMANIAN  SPANISH  РУССКИЙ

What part will your country play in World War III?

By Larry Romanoff

The true origins of the two World Wars have been deleted from all our history books and replaced with mythology. Neither War was started (or desired) by Germany, but both at the instigation of a group of European Zionist Jews with the stated intent of the total destruction of Germany. The documentation is overwhelming and the evidence undeniable. (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11)

That history is being repeated today in a mass grooming of the Western world’s people (especially Americans) in preparation for World War IIIwhich I believe is now imminent

READ MORE

 
 

Wednesday, October 6, 2021

Ismail Bashmori -- What do you think about China?



Alright, listen up. I'm going to give you a summary of my entire impression of China as an Egyptian observer. I've been studying the country intensely for the past year — its government, society, history, and transformation — and over the past 3 months I've spoken to hundreds of Chinese and China-haters on this site and heard everything they had to say. By now I’ve learned roughly as much about China as anyone can learn without knowing the language or living in the country, and I've reached my conclusion. You might think I'm crazy. That's OK with me. I've seen the facts and my opinion of the truth has become rock-solid. And China attracts a lot of haters, know-nothings and armchair experts.

The truth is that China is the greatest country on the face of the earth. It makes all other countries look insignificant and contemptible. It is the most brilliant, most industrious, most ambitious, most educated, meritocratic and technocratic, most modern, sophisticated, and civilized, and best-governed country in the world of our time, by far. It is the first nonwhite, non-Western country to reach this status since the 1600s. The determination of this country is indescribable. Supernatural. There is no force that can stop it from accomplishing anything it wants to do. It can set a goal that seems completely outlandish, drug-induced, hallucinatory — and it can make it happen. That's precisely what it's been doing. Forty years ago a flush toilet in China was a luxury. Today it has its own indigenously built Chinese Space Station. Believe me when I tell you that that is a tiny example of China's capabilities.

I am a patriotic Egyptian and Middle Easterner. Yet I freely admit that compared to the Chinese, we are simply monkeys. A race of dumb animals. It doesn't matter who we are. Egyptians, Syrians, Pakistanis, Indians, Africans, even Americans. Next to the Chinese, we are pathetic. We can't do what they do. We would have a mountain, an Everest of changes to make, and we would whine and bicker and fail at every one of them. China's story since the 1980s has been one of an almost divine metamorphosis. Next to China the entire Western world from Alaska to New Zealand has stagnated. Next to China the entire developing world from Brazil to Madagascar has progressed only at a crawl. China, my friends, is the mother of all gargantuan bullet trains. Every day it manages to create something new and astonishing. And unlike the United States, unlike the British Empire, unlike the French, Dutch, Germans, Spanish, Portuguese or any other Western nation that had its turn at being a superpower in the past four centuries, China doesn't need to run anybody over or take something from somebody else, to rise majestically.

China is also standing up to the Western world all by herself. The West hates and fears that China is shooting up to the top. They can't believe their four-hundred-year-old global supremacy is being challenged. They hoped that the more China developed, the more it would submit to their influence, interests, and leadership. That didn't happen. So now they will do anything possible, short of a nuclear war, to make China end. Their goal is to destroy this country. That's why, although the United States has killed several million people and turned several regions of the earth into hellscapes in the past thirty years, your TV, newspapers, Google newsfeed, and social media are all cursing, condemning and pandering panic and hatred of China 24 / 7. China is the worst fear of our planet's Western masters. They want you to despise and dread a country that's done nothing to you, that hasn't invaded anyone, bombed or sanctioned anyone, that hasn't overthrown any foreign government, or used its military on anything since 1979. You'll hate China and pray for its collapse, so that the West can continue to do what it's done since the age of Hernán Cortés and Francisco Pizarro — rape and pillage the earth from Latin America to Southeast Asia, and disguise its blood-spattered imperialism in the soft power and propaganda of “Western civilization" and world leadership.

China is the only major country in the nonwhite developing world, to stand up to the West. To look it in the eye when challenged or threatened, and say, No, I'm not afraid of you. Do your worst. I'm just as big as you are. All other countries in the Global South are simply Western puppets who submitted long ago. Even the most powerful ones. Saudi Arabia, Brazil, India — their leaders are busy listening to the United States, pen and paper in hand, writing down all its demands and going, Yes sir, Mr. Yankee sir. Let me get on that right away for you.

The 1500s—1000s BC were Egypt's time. Antiquity belonged to the Greeks and Romans. The 1700s belonged to France, and the 1800s to Britain. From 1945 to the present, the world has been under American overlordship. And they call it the Pax Americana but believe me, there isn't much Pax in it. There's plenty of Pax if you're in Europe or Australia. But the Middle East? Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Syria, Iran and Yemen in the past 20 years. Latin America? They've destroyed that part of the world beyond any hope of recovery. Africa? It's only been spared because of disinterest. The US sees Africa as nothing. The whole West does.

But in the twenty-first century, we are witnessing the rise of China. We are decades away from China becoming the greatest power on earth. This will be China's time, and there's nothing anyone can do about it. Attack China all you want, curse her and monger rumours and hysteria — but the truth is that none of your accusations are backed up by evidence, because you are a stooge of the Western press which is under the thumb of Western governments that want to stay on top of the world for all eternity. And the truth is that China is not affected by the noise and maneuvers of her enemies. What's going on now, this stupid new Cold War, is nothing. For her first thirty years, from 1949 to 1979, China was basically blockaded and isolated economically and politically by the West. It didn't even have a seat in the UN General Assembly. And it was dirt-poor in those days, barely a speck of the global economy, a tiny fraction of Japan's or Germany's GDP — not even able to prevent famine. And it still didn't submit to pressure or take any orders. Why on earth would it do that now?

China will be the next global power. There's nothing that can be done about that. The first stage is that its economy only needs to grow at 4.7 percent per year to become the world's largest by 2035. That means the usual, historical bare-minimum of 6 percent is already overkill. The US can build as many bases as it wants, slap as many sanctions as it wants, recognize whatever bogus genocides it wants. That's what it's been doing all along. Has any of it made a difference? China can adapt to any situation. It took China a mere ten years to go from being barred by the US Congress from participating in the “International" Space Station, to building its own Space Station from the zero. See, the US has an $800-billion war budget, 800 military bases, 13,000 aircraft, 500 warships, 6,000 nukes — but it doesn't have what China has: invincible national resolve. It takes the US about 5 years to renovate a bridge, and it takes China 43 hours. There's simply no competing with that. China doesn't need to be a military superpower or empire. That was never part of the plan. US troops, God bless their souls, will continue sitting in their bases, scratching their balls, costing their government $800 billion a year to do nothing. Meanwhile, China will continue to actually develop. That's the part of the equation that America totally missed, because it has barely developed since Reagan's day. China is a better place to live today than at any time in its previous 5,000 years; Americans saw their highest standard of living in the 1960s and those days will never come back.

So yes, China will be the next global power, and the Chinese are vastly superior to us in every way. This is a fact that everyone can attack but that nobody can change, like the theory of evolution. The difference between me and other people is that I ask, Why is this a problem? Why is this something to be afraid of? Why doesn't it mean — that the world will finally get better?

Look at you silly buggers, talking about China like it's going to be the next Nazi Germany. Even many Middle Easterners I know fit in this foolish category. Did you notice when the US invaded or overthrew the governments of 20 countries in the past 32 years (my lifetime)? Did you even know? You think just because you're ready to forget all that because of Beyoncé and Game of Thrones and Snapchat and other US cultural exports, it didn't happen and isn't still happening? But but, I’m scared! China's big and bad! Because the US is feeding me terror-bytes about Hong Kong, Taiwan, Tibet, Tiananmen Square, Great Leap Forward! I don't see any dead bodies, I can't show you one invasion or one example of Chinese regime change, I can't even find Hong Kong on a map or tell you one factual detail about Tiananmen Square, but the US State Department and all its media are telling me CHINA BAD! Wa, wa!

Even in the nonwhite non-West, so many millions people have no real knowledge of any kind about the Western terror-bytes that have given them such an apprehensive feeling about China. So imagine how blank the typical Westerner is. Blankness doesn't stop prejudice and gullibility. That’s what most China-haters are. As gullible as children getting told about the boogeyman to procure their obedience.

Aren't you at least curious to see what a world with a nonwhite, non-Western leader might look like, after 400 years? Because God knows that leader won't be us. It won't be Brazil or Africa, or the Middle East or India or Indonesia or Nigeria or Pakistan. We're a mess. China was a mess too. But we remain a mess many decades after we achieved independence, and the Chinese went their own way, disentangled their mess and created their destiny. We’re not made of what the Chinese are made of. We might be one day, if we stop taking orders and cozying up to Western puppet-masters. I'm not holding my breath for that to happen.

Where's your concept of innocent until proven guilty? You turn a blind eye to the country that gave you dozens of destroyed nations and millions of corpses to see as proof of its brutality, because it also gave you some amazing sitcoms! While a country you don't have the slightest objective knowledge of, is already Nazi Germany to you because its adversaries, who are also your historical and present-day oppressors, tell you so?

Come on. Let's wait to see one dead body, one invasion, one regime-change operation from the Chinese, before we fly into rage and hysterics about them! Is that so crazy? We've seen centuries of horror from the US and we're still giving 'Murica the benefit of the doubt, even when the brutal truth is crystal-clear.

For myself, I see China as hope. Hope that a colonized, brutalized, primitive and humiliated country, can rise above its past — refuse to be weak any longer — rebuild itself from nothing, with iron resolve, and become too strong to be overrun by the West again! Hope that a nonwhite, non-Western country can look deep within itself and find its own solutions to its problems — proving that (foolishly) trusting the West to guide us isn't necessary! Proof that if we can do what the Chinese did, there will be no limits for us. Imagine a world where the US, France, Britain, Australia, are no more important than Uzbekistan or Paraguay. A world where the World Court might be headquartered in Kuala Lumpur, the World Bank in New Delhi, the United Nations in Jakarta, the IMF in Cairo. A world liberated from the US banking system and the dollar as its reserve currency, so that Washington can no longer tell 200 other countries who they can and can't trade with. A world where an American can be tried for war crimes at the Hague, not just an Iraqi or Liberian or Serb. A world where we don't hear about a non-Western-made vaccine and grunt to ourselves, Oh, it must be poison. A world where we don't have to immigrate to the same countries that turned ours into hellholes, to work as sales clerks or taxi drivers, or even if we're brilliantly employed — to drain our brains from our homelands in the best of cases, and use them to reinforce Western riches and supremacy in exchange for a fat paycheck, instead of using them to make our own countries semi-habitable. When I hear that China has built its own Space Station, landed a rover on Mars, ended extreme poverty, built the Earth's biggest city, dam, telescope, 5G network, highway, air purifier, or whatever the heck it is that will come tomorrow — I feel the same pride as if I were Chinese. It's not happening for all of us, but it's happening for one of us and that's a start. There's got to be such a thing as developing-country nationalism — a common nationalism for all the countries that were colonized and plundered, and remain economically and politically captured by their ex-rulers. A nationalism for the Global South. We are too divided, too brainwashed, too fooled and weak — most of us still worship the countries that destroyed us, are non-Western on the outside and Western on the inside, are hating and fearing and buying all the lies about the only one of us that's made it, and are leaving our countries in droves to let them burn while we “make a better life for ourselves" in the West. Do you want to live on a Western-dominated Earth for another 400 years? If you do, keep doing what you're doing. But I don't!

You know what'll happen for all of us if America's sick wishes come true and its global thuggery does make China collapse? Nothing. Eternal repetition of the status quo. More enslavement, hijacking of our resources and weak corrupt governments, neo-colonialism, invasion, regime change, sanctions, MISERY. Haven't we already seen this? Libya, Cuba, Venezuela, Yugoslavia, Belarus, Iraq, Iran, Vietnam, the Soviet Union. Rest in peace. Even FRANCE and JAPAN for God's sake. What does the United States do when any other country says NO, or simply becomes too powerful, too good at honest competition? IT CRUSHES IT LIKE A BUG. Japan was a Western-style democracy crawling with US troops, with a US-authored pacifist constitution and almost no military and an extremely pro-US government and populace, and it STILL got crushed when it looked like it would become the #1 economy in the 80s. Do Indians really believe that if China goes down, India will be allowed to become a great power? Do they not see that a strong or wealthy India would immediately fall victim to the same despicable US tactics? Don't make me laugh. I remember 10–15 years ago when China was still relatively poor and impotent, and Bush and Obama would talk about China as sweetly as swans. Obama happily had dinner with Xi Jinping in late 2015, called China a crucial partner of the United States, and said the US welcomed China's rise; it was all horseshit. Today Biden, who was there with Obama in late 2015 as Vice-President, angrily rebukes a reporter who merely said that Biden and Xi were old friends. America has taken off its mask. China made it, it wasn't supposed to make it, so now it must die. What a difference 5 years can make. China went from “crucial partner" to “number one threat.”

We should be helping and supporting China to keep climbing to the top, and giving her some serious solidarity as she withstands the new Cold War of Western imperialism. It’s been a long 400 years. China is the first non-Western country to even come close to reaching a status of ultimate global importance. She is akin to the the first member of an impoverished family to go to university. That is our family of nations. And when China gets to the top, believe me, it won't be a repeat of the French, British, or American Empire. Not a single developing country will be worse-off because of China becoming #1. There will be something good in this for all of us, so let's wake up and let's go!

Profile photo for Luisa Vasconcellos

I am so very thankful to all readers, commenters, followers, and new friends, of so many backgrounds and nationalities, both Global Southern and Western, who have responded insightfully to this answer and helped it reach a wide audience. You do me great honour and your response has blown me away. I'm ama

… (more)

I think your answer may have been collapsed. At least I can’t find it in the answer group.

Ismail Bashmori
It’s pinned to the top of my profile.

Tuesday, October 5, 2021

EN --Manlio Dinucci -- The art of war -- The "ecological" transition to nuclear power

 


The art of war

 The "ecological" transition to nuclear power 

Manlio Dinucci

 

The Climate Clock, installed by Italian Minister Roberto Cingolani on the façade of the Ministry of Ecological Transition, has begun its countdown: there are less than 7 years before the global warming climate catastrophe. The clock is set on the forecasts of the Berlin Mcc Institute, not on the IPCC ones (UN Commission on Climate Change). It calculated that the global average temperature, which has risen by about 1 ° C since the 1750 pre-industrial level, could rise in 2050 (after three centuries) by 1.5 ° C, mainly due to CO 2 (carbon dioxide). CO2 is released into the atmosphere by human activities causing an intensification of the greenhouse effect. According to UN scientists the more intense activity of the Sun - other scientists think it is the main cause - contributes secondarily to global warming.

      Minister Cingolani was the main organizer of Milan Pre Cop 2020, during the meeting the complex scientific framework of climate change and its environmental consequences was spectacularized with catastrophic film techniques. Faced with the "scientific" prediction that in seven years the planet Earth will be overwhelmed by the climate catastrophe, the 400 young people from all over the world gathered by Cingolani in Milan, asked to close the fossil fuel industry by 2030 and that governments stop financing it right now, replacing it with green sources without CO2 emission. Minister Cingolani pledged to achieve this goal. There would actually be a way to do it, if Italy had a strategic plan to create an integrated energy system based on photovoltaic, and above all thermodynamic solar (with mirrors  concentrating the sun's rays), and on large wind farms mainly offshore (with wind turbines floating or installed on shallow waters). The innovative thermodynamic solar project, developed by Nobel Prize Carlo Rubbia, which would have made possible to produce a third of Italian electricity needs with some zero-emission solar power plants, was decimated and now this technology is used in China. The construction of offshore wind farms is hindered, so much so that there is only one in Taranto.

      However, Minister Cingolani had the "solution": nuclear power (see article by Greenpeace Italy director on the September 3 poster). Cingolani declared it in an open and polemical way when he was invited by former Prime Minister Matteo Renzi to Italia Viva School of Political Education. Minister Cigolani then sponsored a Conference of nuclear advocates. It is no coincidence that afterwards he met John Kerry, the US President's special envoy for climate management, who reconverted from opponent to proponent of nuclear power. Lega Leader Matteo Salvini immediately joined Cingolani and said: «A nuclear power plant in Lombardy? And what's the problem?" Therefore, the powerful nuclear lobby has also taken root in Italy, which has already achieved a first fundamental result in the EU: the Joint Research Center, commissioned by the European Commission, has included nuclear energy among the "green energy sources" supported and financed by the European Union to eliminate CO2 emissions by 2050.

      The EU is thus relaunching the nuclear industry at a time when the EU is in a deep crisis due to rising costs and technical problems. Solar power plants can produce more electricity than nuclear power plants without additional costs or dangerous emissions. Only to temporarily store the enormous amount of radioactive waste produced by EU nuclear power plants is expected to cost 420-570 billion euros. Moreover, there is the huge amount of money necessary for dismantling the plants themselves, which for the most part have reached or exceeded the age limit of 35 years becoming increasingly expensive and dangerous. Meanwhile, the International Atomic Energy Agency has authorized the discharge into the sea of over one million tons of radioactive water, accumulated in the Fukushima nuclear power plant after the 2011 accident, the result is that cancer deaths caused by the «Green energy source» will increase. 

Manlio Dinucci

(il manifesto, October 5, 2021)


Monday, October 4, 2021

PT -- Manlio Dinucci -- A Arte da Guerra -- A transição 'ecológica' para o nuclear

 


A Arte da Guerra

 A transição “ecológica”  para o nuclear 

Manlio Dinucci

FRANÇAIS   ITALIANO   PORTUGUÊS

O Relógio do Clima, instalado por Roberto Cingolani na fachada do Ministério da Transição Ecológica, iniciou a contagem decrescente: faltam menos de 7 anos para a catástrofe climática causada pelo aquecimento global. O relógio está regulado calibrado de acordo com as previsões do instituto MCC [1], em Berlim, e não nas do IPCC [2](Comissão das Nações Unidas para as Alterações Climáticas). Calcula que a temperatura média global, que aumentou cerca de 1 °C desde o nível pré-industrial de 1750, poderá aumentar 1,5 °C em 2050 (ou seja, em três séculos), principalmente devido ao CO2 (dióxido de carbono) libertado na atmosfera pelas actividades humanas, o que causa uma intensificação do efeito de estufa. Segundo os cientistas da ONU, contribui secondariamente para o aquecimento global o aumento da actividade do Sol, enquanto, pelo contrário, para outros cientistas é a causa principal.

No Pré-Cop de Milão, do qual o Ministro Cingolani foi o principal organizador, o complexo quadro científico das alterações climáticas e das suas consequências ambientais foi espectacularizado utilizando técnicas de filmes sobre catástrofes. Confrontados com a previsão "científica" de que dentro de sete anos o planeta Terra será envolvido numa catástrofe climática, os 400 jovens de todo o mundo, reunidos por Cingolani em Milão, exigiram que a indústria de combustíveis fósseis fosse encerrada até 2030 e que os governos deixassem de financiá-la agora, substituindo-a por fontes verdes que não emitem CO2.  O Ministro Cingolani comprometeu-se em concretizar esse objectivo. Há de facto uma forma de o fazer, se a Itália tivesse um plano estratégico para criar um sistema energético integrado baseado na energia solar fotovoltaica e especialmente termodinâmica (com espelhos que concentram os raios solares), e em grandes parques eólicos, especialmente offshore (com turbinas eólicas instaladas em águas pouco profundas ou flutuantes). O projecto inovador solar termodinâmico desenvolvido pelo Prémio Nobel, Carlo Rubbia, que teria tornado possível produzir um terço das necessidades eléctricas italianas com algumas centrais solares de emissão zero, foi deliberadamente afundado e está agora a ser utilizado na China. A construção de parques eólicos offshore está dificultada, de tal forma que existe apenas um, em Taranto.

O Ministro Cingolani tem, contudo, uma "solução": a energia nuclear (ver artigo do Director do Greenpeace Itália no il manifesto de 3 de Setembro). Cingolani declarou-o, de modo aberto e polémico, quando foi convidado por Renzi para a Escola de Educação Política ‘Italia Viva’[3]. O Ministro patrocinou então uma conferência de apoiantes nucleares. Não é coincidência que, depois de conhecer John Kerry, o enviado especial do Presidente dos EUA para a gestão climática, se tenha convertido de oponente a apoiante da energia nuclear. Cingolani foi imediatamente acompanhado por Salvini, que disse: "Uma central nuclear na Lombardia? Qual é o problema?” Assim, o poderoso lobby nuclear também se radicou em Itália, que já obteve um primeiro resultado fundamental na União Europeia: o Centro Comum de Investigação, encomendado pela Comissão Europeia, incluiu a energia nuclear entre as "fontes de energia verde" apoiadas e financiadas pela União Europeia, para eliminar as emissões de CO2 até 2050.

Assim, a União Europeia está a relançar a indústria nuclear, numa altura em que esta se encontra em profunda crise devido ao aumento dos custos e a problemas técnicos. Embora as centrais de energia solar possam produzir mais electricidade do que as centrais nucleares, sem custos adicionais ou emissões perigosas, só para armazenar temporariamente a enorme quantidade de resíduos radioactivos produzidos pelas centrais nucleares da União Europeia, espera-se que o seu custo seja de 420-570 biliões de euros. Adiciona-se a enorme cifra necessária para o desmantelamento dessas mesmas centrais, que, na maior parte atingiram ou superaram a idade limite de 35 anos e estão a tornar-se cada vez mais caras e perigosas. Entretanto, a Agência Internacional para a Energia Atómica autorizou a descarga no mar de mais de um milhão de toneladas de água radioactiva, que se acumulou na central nuclear de Fukushima, após o acidente de 2011, com o  resultado de que aumentaram as mortes por cancro provocadas por esta “fonte de energia  verde”.

Manlio Dinucci

il manifesto, 5 de Outubro 2021

 Notas da Rede Voltaire

 

[1] Ao contrário do que o nome parece indicar, este instituto não é um organismo de investigação científica, mas um grupo de reflexão política. Nota da Rede Voltaire.

 

[2] Mais precisamente, o Grupo de Peritos Intergovernamental sobre as Alterações Climáticas (IPCC) é um órgão da Organização Meteorológica Mundial sob o patrocínio do Programa das Nações Unidas para o Ambiente. Foi criado por instigação da cientista Margaret Thatcher (Primeiro-Ministro do Reino Unido). O seu objectivo era combater os sindicatos britânicos dos mineiros de carvão, apoiando simultaneamente a energia nuclear como uma fonte de energia limpa. Os cientistas que o compõem não o fazem como cientistas, mas como funcionários que representam o governo do seu país. O IPCC não é uma instância científica, mas sim um organismo político. Não tem a capacidade de criticar esta ou aquela teoria, mas apenas de desenvolver um "consenso" sobre a formulação científica de políticas públicas. Ler "The Ecological Pretext" (estudo em três partes) por Thierry Meyssan, Оdnako (Rússia), Rede Voltaire, 20 de Abril de 2010. Nota da Rede Voltaire.


[3] Italia Viva é o partido político fundado por Matteo Renzi. Nota da Rede Voltaire.

FR -- Manlio Dinucci -- L'art de la guerre -- La transition “écologique” au nucléaire

 


L’art de la guerre

 La transition “écologique” au nucléaire 

Manlio Dinucci

 

L’horloge du climat, installée par Roberto Cingolani sur la façade du Ministère de la transition écologique, a commencé le compte à rebours : il manque moins de 7 ans avant la catastrophe climatique provoquée par le réchauffement mondial. L’horloge est réglée sur les prévisions de l’institut Mcc de Berlin [1], et pas sur celles de l’Ipcc (la Commission de l’ONU sur le changement climatique) [2]. Elle calcule que la température moyenne mondiale, augmentée d’environ 1°C depuis le niveau préindustriel de 1750, pourrait monter en 2050 (c’est-à-dire en trois siècles) de 1,5 °C, principalement à cause du CO2 (anhydride carbonique) introduit dans l’atmosphère par les activités humaines, qui provoque une intensification de l’effet de serre. Selon les scientifiques ONU, ce qui contribue secondairement au réchauffement mondial est l’activité plus intense du Soleil, qui pour d’autres scientifiques est au contraire la cause principale.

 

  Dans la Pre Cop de Milan, dont le ministre Cingolani a été le principal organisateur, le cadre scientifique complexe du changement climatique et de ses conséquences environnementales a été mis en scène avec des techniques de film catastrophe. Face à la prévision “scientifique” que d’ici sept ans la planète Terre sera submergée par la catastrophe climatique, les 400 jeunes rassemblés par Cingolani à Milan, venant du monde entier, ont demandé que l’industrie des sources fossiles soit close avant 2030 et que les gouvernements arrêtent de la financer dès maintenant, en la remplaçant par des sources vertes qui n’émettent pas de CO2. Le ministre Cingolani s’est engagé à réaliser cet objectif. Il y aurait effectivement moyen de le faire, si l’Italie avait un plan stratégique  pour réaliser un système énergétique intégré fondé sur le solaire photovoltaïque et surtout thermodynamique  (avec des miroirs qui concentrent les rayons du soleil), et sur de grands parcs éoliens surtout offshore (avec des turbines éoliennes installées en eaux peu profondes ou flottantes). L’innovant projet du solaire thermodynamique mis au point par le Prix Nobel Carlo Rubbia, qui aurait permis de produire un tiers des besoins italiens en énergie électrique avec certaines centrales solaires à émission zéro, a été délibérément enterré, et cette technologie est maintenant utilisée en Chine. La réalisation de parcs éoliens offshore se trouve contrecarrée,  au point qu’il n’en existe qu’un, à Tarente. 

 

  Mais la “solution”, le ministre Cingolani l’a : c’est le nucléaire (voir article du directeur de Greenpeace Italia sur il manifesto du 3 septembre). Cingolani l’a déclaré de façon ouverte et polémique quand il a été invité par Renzi à l’Ecole de formation politique de Italia Viva [3]. Le ministre a donc parrainé un colloque de soutiens du nucléaire. Non par hasard après avoir rencontré John Kerry, envoyé spécial du Président USA pour la gestion du climat, reconverti d’opposant en soutien du nucléaire. Immédiatement Salvini s’est mis en rang derrière Cingolani, en disant : “Une centrale nucléaire en Lombardie ? Où est le problème ? “. Donc en Italie aussi s’est implanté le puissant lobby nucléaire, qui a déjà obtenu dans l’Ue un premier et fondamental résultat : le Centre conjoint de recherche, mandaté par la Commission Européenne, a inclus le nucléaire dans les “sources énergétiques vertes” soutenues et financées par l’Union Européenne pour éliminer d’ici 2050 les émissions de CO2.

 

  L’Ue relance ainsi l’industrie nucléaire au moment où elle est en profonde crise à cause des coûts croissants et de problèmes techniques. Alors que les centrales solaires peuvent produire plus d’électricité que les nucléaires, sans coûts supplémentaires ni émissions dangereuses, on prévoit, seulement pour stocker provisoirement l’énorme quantité de déchets radioactifs produits par les centrales nucléaires de l’Ue, une dépense de 420-570 milliards d’euros. Auxquels s’ajoute l’énorme chiffre nécessaire au démantèlement des centrales mêmes, dont la majorité a atteint ou dépassé l’âge limite de 35 ans, devenant de plus en plus coûteuses et dangereuses. Pendant ce temps l’Agence internationale pour l’énergie atomique a autorisé le déversement en mer de plus d’un million de tonnes d’eau radioactive, accumulée dans la centrale nucléaire de Fukushima après l’accident de 2011. Avec pour résultat qu’augmenteront les morts du cancer provoquées par cette “source énergétique verte”.

 

Edition de mardi 5 octobre 2021 d’il manifesto

Traduit de l’italien par Marie-Ange Patrizio

[1] Contrairement à ce que son nom semble indiquer, cet institut n’est pas un organe de recherche scientifique, mais un think tank politique. Note du Réseau Voltaire.

[2] Plus précisément, le Groupe d’experts intergouvernemental sur l’évolution du climat (GIEC) est un organisme de l’Organisation météorologique mondiale placé sous le haut patronage du Programme des Nations unies pour l’environnement. Il a été créé sous l’impulsion de la scientifique Margaret Thatcher (Premier ministre du Royaume-Uni). Il s’agissait pour elle de contrer les syndicats britanniques des mineurs de charbon tout en soutenant le nucléaire en tant que source d’énergie propre. Les scientifiques qui y siègent le font non pas en tant que scientifiques, mais en tant que fonctionnaires représentants le gouvernement de leur pays. Le GIEC n’est pas une instance scientifique, mais politique. Il n’a pas la capacité de critiquer telle ou telle théorie, mais uniquement d’élaborer un « consensus » sur la formulation scientifique des politiques publiques. Lire « Le prétexte écologique » (étude en trois parties) par Thierry Meyssan, Оdnako (Russie) , Réseau Voltaire, 20 avril 2010. Note du Réseau Voltaire.

[3] Italia Viva est le parti politique fondé par Matteo Renzi. Note du Réseau Voltaire.

IT -- Manlio Dinucci -- L'arte della guerra -- La transizione "ecologica" al nucleare

 


L’arte della guerra

 La transizione “ecologica”  al nucleare 

Manlio Dinucci

 

L’Orologio del clima, installato da Roberto Cingolani sulla facciata del Ministero della transizione ecologica, ha iniziato il countdown: mancano meno di 7 anni alla catastrofe climatica provocata dal riscaldamento globale. L’orologio è tarato sulle previsioni dell’istituto Mcc di Berlino, non su quelle della Ipcc (la Commissione Onu sul cambiamento climatico). Essa calcola che la temperatura media globale, aumentata di circa 1 °C dal livello preindustriale del 1750, potrebbe salire nel 2050 (ossia in tre secoli) di 1,5 °C, principalmente a causa della CO2 (anidride carbonica) immessa nell’atmosfera dalle attività umane, che provoca una intensificazione dell’effetto serra. Secondo gli scienziati Onu, contribuisce secondariamente al riscaldamento globale la più intensa attività del Sole, che per altri scienziati è invece la causa principale.


Nella Pre Cop di Milano, di cui il ministro Cingolani è stato principale organizzatore, il complesso quadro scientifico del cambiamento climatico e delle sue conseguenze ambientali è stato spettacolarizzato con tecniche da film catastrofico. Di fronte alla previsione «scientifica» che tra sette anni il pianeta Terra sarà travolto dalla catastrofe climatica, i 400 giovani radunati da Cingolani a Milano da tutto il mondo hanno chiesto che l’industria delle fonti fossili sia chiusa entro il 2030 e che i governi smettano di finanziarla fin da ora, sostituendola con fonti green che non emettano CO2.  Il ministro Cingolani si è impegnato a realizzare tale obiettivo. Ci sarebbe effettivamente modo di farlo, se l’Italia avesse un piano strategico per realizzare un sistema energetico integrato basato sul solare fotovoltaico e soprattutto termodinamico (con specchi che concentrano i raggi del Sole), e su grandi parchi eolici soprattutto offshore (con turbine eoliche installate su bassi fondali o galleggianti). L’innovativo progetto del solare termodinamico messo a punto dal Premio Nobel Carlo Rubbia, che avrebbe permesso di produrre un terzo del fabbisogno italiano di energia elettrica con alcune centrali solari a emissioni zero, fu deliberatamente affossato e ora tale tecnologia viene usata in Cina. La realizzazione di parchi eolici offshore viene ostacolata, tanto che ce n’è solo uno a Taranto.


La «soluzione» il ministro Cingolani, però, ce l’ha: il nucleare (v. articolo del direttore di Greenpeace Italia sul manifesto del 3 settembre). Cingolani lo ha dichiarato in modo aperto e polemico quando è stato invitato da Renzi alla Scuola di formazione politica di Italia Viva. Il ministro ha quindi patrocinato un convegno di sostenitori del nucleare. Non a caso dopo che ha incontrato John Kerry, inviato speciale del Presidente Usa per la gestione del clima, riconvertitosi da oppositore a sostenitore del nucleare. A Cingolani si è accodato subito Salvini, che ha detto: «Una centrale nucleare in Lombardia? E che problema c’è?». Anche in Italia dunque si è radicata la potente lobby del nucleare, che ha già ottenuto nella Ue un primo, fondamentale risultato: il Centro congiunto di ricerca, incaricato dalla Commissione Europea, ha incluso il nucleare tra le «fonti energetiche verdi» sostenute e finanziate dall’Unione Europea per eliminare entro il 2050 le emissioni di CO2.

La UE rilancia così l’industria nucleare nel momento in cui è in profonda crisi a causa dei crescenti costi e problemi tecnici. Mentre le centrali solari possono produrre più elettricità di quelle nucleari, senza costi aggiuntivi né pericolose emissioni, solo per stoccare provvisoriamente l’enorme quantità di scorie radioattive prodotte dalle centrali nucleari della Ue si prevede una spesa di 420-570 miliardi di euro. Si aggiunge l’enorme cifra necessaria allo smantellamento delle centrali stesse, che per la maggior parte hanno raggiunto o superato l’età limite di 35 anni, divenendo sempre più costose e pericolose. Intanto l’Agenzia internazionale per l’energia atomica ha autorizzato lo scarico in mare di oltre un milione di tonnellate di acqua radioattiva, accumulatasi nella centrale nucleare di Fukushima dopo l’incidente del 2011. col risultato che aumenteranno le morti per cancro provocate da questa «fonte energetica verde».

Manlio Dinucci

il manifesto, 5 ottobre 2021

Friday, October 1, 2021

EN -- Manlio Dinucci -- The Art of War -- Italy increasingly armed

 


The Art of War

 Italy increasingly armed 

Manlio Dinucci

 

 

Today in La Spezia the Minister of Defense Lorenzo Guerini inaugurates SeaFuture 2021, the military-naval exhibition sponsored by the main war industries. In the lead Fincantieri ("strategic sponsor"), Leonardo ("platinum sponsor") and Mbda (European joint venture in which Leonardo has 25%) which participates as "gold sponsor".

 

The "Future" has already been outlined in the "Directive for the industrial policy of Defense", issued by Guerini on July 29: Italy must "have a military instrument capable of expressing the advanced military capabilities that the country needs to protect its national interests", which ensures "its membership in the circle of technologically and economically advanced countries". The Directive, overturning Article 11 and other constitutional principles with the silent consent of Parliament, establishes that Italy must increasingly arm itself.

 

At the same time it establishes that Italy must maintain and strengthen "the strategic relationship with the United States, to ensure the involvement in technological innovation that finds in the U.S. one of the main incubators, to facilitate access of Italian companies in the American market and to better position Italy in the European context.

 

The line traced by the Directive has already been operational for some time. Suffice it to recall: the boarding on the aircraft carrier Cavour, the Navy's flagship, of the US F-35B short take-off and vertical landing fighter aircraft, for which the ship was certified at Norfolk in Virginia; the decision to arm Italian submarines and frigates with Cruise missiles with a range of at least 1,000 km; the decision to arm the Reaper drones, which Italy has purchased from the US. These and other armaments, with which our armed forces are equipped, are not for defense but for attack.

 

The Cavour armed with the F-35B becomes an advanced military base that, deployed in distant theaters of war, can attack and invade a country; the submarines and frigates can strike a country from a great distance with cruise missiles that, flying at very low altitude over the sea and along the contour of the land, escape anti-aircraft defences; the Reaper drones, remotely controlled from thousands of kilometres away, can strike human "targets" with Infernal Fire missiles and laser or satellite guided bombs. Italy is thus arming itself to participate in other wars under US/NATO command.

 

The "strategic relationship with the United States", established by the Directive, is getting stronger every day. The Fincantieri group, 70% controlled by the Ministry of Economy, has three shipyards in the USA, where it is building ten multi-role frigates for the US Navy and four similar warships for Saudi Arabia. Leonardo - the largest Italian military industry, which derives over 70% of its turnover from armaments - supplies products and services to the US armed forces and intelligence agencies, and in Italy manages the Cameri plant for Lockheed Martin's F-35 fighters. The 30% of the shareholding of the Leonardo group belongs to the Ministry of Economic Development.

 

For this reason, at the military exhibition in La Spezia, alongside Minister Guerini of the PD, Minister Giorgetti of the League participates. Described as an "expert in accounts", he is in charge of managing the 30 billion euros already allocated by the Ministry of Economic Development for military purposes and the other 25 required by the Recovery Fund.  The 26 billion euros spent annually by the Ministry of Defence are no longer enough.  It is necessary to pass to at least 36 billion per year, as requested by NATO and reiterated by the US.

 

Just to make a few figures, the aircraft carrier Cavour cost 1.3 billion euros, the 15 F-35Bs for the Navy cost 1.7 billion, and to these are added another 15 F-35Bs and 60 F-35As with nuclear capability for the Air Force. Then there are the operational expenses: one day of navigation of the Cavour costs over 200 thousand euros and one hour of flight of an F-35 over 40 thousand euros. Always with public money subtracted from the social species, invested in weapons and wars to "protect our national interests and belong to the circle of economically advanced countries.

 

(the manifesto, September 28, 2021)

ERIC ZUESSE -- How to End America’s MIC (Military-Industrial Complex) and Constant Wars: In Order to Prevent WW III, The U.S. Government Should Default on Its Bonds.


How to End America’s MIC (Military-Industrial Complex) and Constant Wars:

In Order to Prevent WW III, The U.S. Government Should Default on Its Bonds.

 

Eric Zuesse, October 01, 2021






 

America’s congressional progressives should join with the Republican Party’s mere bluff-campaign to drive the U.S. Government into defaulting on its bonds, so that congressional Republicans’ repeated threats to shut down the Government will either shut it down or else enormously embarrass the Republican Party and disappoint its base of voters by exposing the fraudulence, on fiscal and military issues, of congressional Republicans. Doing this would not help congressional Republicans, but it would greatly help the American people; and here is why:

 

International relations are now reaching the brinks of war between the U.S. and its allies, on the one hand, versus Russia and its allies on the other (including China), so that World War III could happen at virtually any time now. Russia and its allies never privatized their weapons-manufacturers; and, so, they’re not controlled by their weapons-makers as America and its allies are. In those ‘enemy’ countries, the armament-firms don’t control the Government; but, in ours, they do. On the U.S.-and-allied side, war is actually the main source of profits and wealth for the biggest investors, who control the successful politicians and their Government. It’s why America is constantly at war. In order for U.S.-and-allied weapons-manufacturing firms (“government contractors”) such as Lockheed Martin and BAE to thrive, they need to increase their weapons-sales to their own Government and also to its allied Governments (who also buy weapons from those firms). Such firms sell little or nothing to consumers; governments are their markets. Consequently, the weapons-manufacturers need to control their government and its international relations including the designations of which foreign nations will be “allies” and which will instead be “enemies” (or targets); and they therefore have large lobbying-operations and make crucial political donations to all but the few members of Congress who oppose new wars and new weapons-procurements. 

 

Manifestações

2007 Speech

UKRAINE ON FIRE

Discurso do Presidente da Rússia, Vladimir Putin, na manhã do dia 24 de Fevereiro de 2022

Discurso do Presidente da Rússia, Vladimir Putin, Tradução em português




Presidente da Rússia, Vladimir Putin: Cidadãos da Rússia, Amigos,

Considero ser necessário falar hoje, de novo, sobre os trágicos acontecimentos em Donbass e sobre os aspectos mais importantes de garantir a segurança da Rússia.

Começarei com o que disse no meu discurso de 21 de Fevereiro de 2022. Falei sobre as nossas maiores responsabilidades e preocupações e sobre as ameaças fundamentais que os irresponsáveis políticos ocidentais criaram à Rússia de forma continuada, com rudeza e sem cerimónias, de ano para ano. Refiro-me à expansão da NATO para Leste, que está a aproximar cada vez mais as suas infraestruturas militares da fronteira russa.

É um facto que, durante os últimos 30 anos, temos tentado pacientemente chegar a um acordo com os principais países NATO, relativamente aos princípios de uma segurança igual e indivisível, na Europa. Em resposta às nossas propostas, enfrentámos invariavelmente, ou engano cínico e mentiras, ou tentativas de pressão e de chantagem, enquanto a aliança do Atlântico Norte continuou a expandir-se, apesar dos nossos protestos e preocupações. A sua máquina militar está em movimento e, como disse, aproxima-se da nossa fronteira.

Porque é que isto está a acontecer? De onde veio esta forma insolente de falar que atinge o máximo do seu excepcionalismo, infalibilidade e permissividade? Qual é a explicação para esta atitude de desprezo e desdém pelos nossos interesses e exigências absolutamente legítimas?

Read more

ARRIVING IN CHINA

Ver a imagem de origem

APPEAL


APPEAL TO THE LEADERS OF THE NINE NUCLEAR WEAPONS' STATES

(China, France, India, Israel, North Korea, Pakistan, Russia, the United Kingdom and the United States)

中文 DEUTSCH ENGLISH FRANÇAIS ITALIAN PORTUGUESE RUSSIAN SPANISH ROMÂNA

manlio + maria

MOON OF SHANGHAI site

LR on CORONAVIRUS

LARRY ROMANOFF on CORONAVIRUS

Read more at Moon of Shanghai

World Intellectual Property Day (or Happy Birthday WIPO) - Spruson ...


Moon of Shanghai

L Romanoff

Larry Romanoff,

contributing author

to Cynthia McKinney's new COVID-19 anthology

'When China Sneezes'

When China Sneezes: From the Coronavirus Lockdown to the Global Politico-Economic Crisis

manlio

James Bacque

BYOBLU

irmãos de armas


Subtitled in PT, RO, SP

Click upon CC and choose your language.


manlio

VP




Before the Presidential Address to the Federal Assembly.



The President of Russia delivered
the Address to the Federal Assembly. The ceremony took
place at the Manezh Central Exhibition Hall.


January
15, 2020


vp

President of Russia Vladimir Putin:

Address to the Nation

Address to the Nation.

READ HERE


brics


Imagem

PT -- VLADIMIR PUTIN na Sessão plenária do Fórum Económico Oriental

Excertos da transcrição da sessão plenária do Fórum Económico Oriental

THE PUTIN INTERVIEWS


The Putin Interviews
by Oliver Stone (
FULL VIDEOS) EN/RU/SP/FR/IT/CH


http://tributetoapresident.blogspot.com/2018/07/the-putin-interviews-by-oliver-stone.html




TRIBUTE TO A PRESIDENT


NA PRMEIRA PESSOA

Um auto retrato surpreendentemente sincero do Presidente da Rússia, Vladimir Putin

CONTEÚDO

Prefácio

Personagens Principais em 'Na Primeira Pessoa'

Parte Um: O Filho

Parte Dois: O Estudante

Parte Três: O Estudante Universitário

Parte Quatro: O Jovem especialista

Parte Cinco: O Espia

Parte Seis: O Democrata

Parte Sete: O Burocrata

Parte Oito: O Homem de Família

Parte Nove: O Político

Apêndice: A Rússia na Viragem do Milénio


contaminação nos Açores



Subtitled in EN/PT

Click upon the small wheel at the right side of the video and choose your language.


convegno firenze 2019