“That’s
not the way the world really works anymore. We’re an empire now, and when we
act, we create our own reality. And while you’re studying that
reality—judiciously, as you will—we’ll act again, creating other new realities,
which you can study too, and that’s how things will sort out. We’re history’s
actors … and you, all of you, will be left to just study what we do.”
Thus
spake Karl Rove, Deputy Chief of Staff in the Government of George W. Bush.
I
do wish people would study Rove’s words more carefully. Judiciously study them.
If they did, then whenever the next alleged atrocity occurs and the United
States, together with its coalition of supine vassals, starts yelling and
hollering 10 minutes later for action to be taken, on the basis of a test-tube
full of washing powder, or pictures of injured women and children in a war
zone, and the entire media of dutiful stenographers shrieks that “something
must be done”, then perhaps we might pause and wonder if we are being played.
Instead of falling into an emotional spasm, maybe we would instead reject the
deafening drumbeats of war – wars that have a habit of killing immeasurably
more women and children than the alleged incidents on which they are based, by
the way — and ask ourselves whether “Rove’s Law” has come into play.
As
an aside, the West’s interventionist wars remind me of that wonderfully cynical
exchange in the film, The Man With Two Brains:
Dr.
Hfuhruhurr: “The only time we doctors should accept death is when it’s
caused by our own incompetence!”
Dr.
Necessiter: “Nonsense! If the murder of twelve innocent people can help
save one human life, it will have been worth it!”
Here’s Dr.
Necessiter selling us into war in Iraq: “Nonsense! If it costs us the deaths of
500,000 people to topple the evil dictator Saddam Hussein, it will have been
worth it!”
Here
he is selling us bombs on Libya: “Nonsense! If turning Libya into a failed
state, a terrorist’s playground, and causing a mass exodus of refugees is the
price for getting rid of Gaddafi, it will have been worth it.”
And
here’s Dr Necessiter again, this time trying to sell us into bombing Syria:
“Nonsense! Risking a catastrophic clash with a country armed with thousands of
nuclear weapons is worth it in order to respond to the alleged deaths of less
than a hundred people in a totally unproven chemical weapons attack.”
Behold,
the “logic” of the interventionists!
But
back to Rove. What was he saying? Three things:
Number
one: We
– that is the Globalist Deep State, centred in Washington DC – are sovereign
over the entire globe and we will do as we please.
Number
two: That
we don’t follow reality, we create it.
Number
three: That we are prepared to do things that will make your
jaws drop, your hair stand on end, and your eyes boggle as you wonder what is
going on, and while your jaws, your hair and your eyes are busy doing their
thing, we will have moved onto create our next reality.
In
other words – we are God – and not a kind and merciful God, but a God who lords
it over all peoples’, nations and tongues, who tells lies, and then tells more
lies to cover up those lies and – when you poor saps are trying to work out
what it is we’re really up to – before you know what has happened, those lies
and those lies to cover up lies will have become the new reality. We’ll have
moved on and the world with it, and the narrative we have created will have
been written in the history books, which we ourselves shall write.
The
cases of Sergei Skripal and the alleged chemical attack in Eastern Ghouta seem
somehow to represent the zenith of this ideology.
I
do not know who poisoned Sergei Skripal or for what reason. It could be that
the Russian Government was behind it, although this would mean accepting the
highly improbable thesis that they decided to target a has-been MI6 spy, who
they released from prison eight years ago, using perhaps the dumbest
assassination method in the history of the world – an ineffective,
slow-operating, “military-grade” nerve agent, which could be traced back to
them, and which they smeared on a door handle in rainy Salisbury –, a week or
so before a Presidential election, and less than 100 days before they are due
to host the World Cup. In other words, the official narrative does not rest on
accepting that the Russian state is the epitome of pure evil; it rests on
accepting that it is the epitome of insanity and bumbling incompetence.
I
do not know what happened in Eastern Ghouta. It could be that the Syrian
Government was behind what is alleged to have happened (if it indeed did
happen), but this would mean having to accept the thesis that just 24 hours
away from completely liberating the last pocket of resistance in Damascus,
after the US, the UK and France had all warned that they would attack if
chemical weapons were used, just a week or so after the US President, Donald J.
Swamp, announced that the US would be pulling out of Syria (which they occupied
illegally, by the way), they made the decision to use a weapon that gave them
no military advantage whatsoever, but which was practically guaranteed to be
used as a pretext for airstrikes against them. In other words, like the Skripal
case, the theory does not stand on accepting that the Syrian state is the
epitome of pure evil; it stands on accepting that it is the epitome of
self-defeating stupidity on an epic scale.
But
you see what I’ve done? I’ve fallen right into Karl Rove’s trap, haven’t I? I’m
asking questions about whether the narratives in these cases stack up. In the
Skripal case, I’ve been judiciously studying reality by asking lots of
questions that ought to have occurred to anyone with a keen interest in
arriving at the truth (here and here, for instance). I could do the same with the Syrian
case, if I had the time.
Yet
while I’m doing so, the narrative is moving on. I’m falling into exactly the
trap that Karl and his disciples have laid. They want two sorts of people:
those who just blindly accept that it was the Russians wot did it, or that it
was Assad wot did it; and those who spend their time asking questions about the
official explanations. The first group call the second group conspiracy
theorists and nutters. The second group call the first group dumb sheeple. And
the Globalist Deep State laughs and laughs and laughs as the two groups battle
it out to make sense of what has happened, leaving it free to march on to
create the next reality. Truly I tell you, these Bolsheviks have learnt their
Hegelian Dialectics well.
Now,
this is not to rule out that in the Salisbury and Eastern Ghouta cases the
official narratives might – just might – be the correct ones. That both
Vladimir Putin and Bashar Assad might be the Laurel and Hardy of Geopolitics.
Yet it has to be said that whatever else you think about them, neither of them
tends to come across in interviews as being what you might call dumb or inept.
Nor do either of them give the impression that they have sudden insane impulses
to do things which have absolutely no benefit to them, but which hand their
enemies massive PR victories.
But
this is besides the point. The point is not whether these particular incidents
are what the official narrative says they are, or whether they are
provocations. It suffices for the “new reality creators” to create their
realities on occasion, or perhaps to distort occurrences which they didn’t
create, and before you know it you have your two groups battling over events
which may be real or fake: the conspiracists – who are studying every event to
try to work out the details and the inconsistencies – and the sheeple – who
believe that their Government is full of good hearted, white hatted chaps and
lasses who would never, ever do anything bad – unlike those orcs over in
Mordor.
Rove
and Co have basically created a “reality” where truth is no longer discernible,
where assertions of guilt are taken as fact, and where holes in these kinds of
incidents only serve to divide the people further, so that the Globalist Deep
State can move on to create their next reality.
But
let’s not get gloomy. The good news is that although they clearly think they
can get away with it indefinitely, they can’t. No kingdom or empire built on a
mountain of lies can stand indefinitely. They all fall. And can’t you start to
sense the signs that the empire’s “new realities” – or what are known as lies
in laymen’s terms – are reaching boiling point? Don’t you sense that they have
just got too confident and in doing so have begun to get careless? They are
making mistakes. And as they do, they are having to resort to bigger and bigger
lies to cover up the ones they’ve already told.
Sadly
for Rove and Co, but happily for the rest of us, the world doesn’t actually
work the way they think it does. Reality — I mean real reality,
rather than the phoney reality they have created — will catch up sooner or
later. I sense that it’s on its way even now. And when it finally comes, the
whole rotten edifice that these “history’s actors” have tried to create will
crash and burn. Bringing much rejoicing.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.