The true origins of the two World Wars have been deleted from all our history books and replaced with mythology. Neither War was started (or desired) by Germany, but both at the instigation of a group of European Zionist Jews with the stated intent of the total destruction of Germany. The documentation is overwhelming and the evidence undeniable. (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11)
That history is being repeated today in a mass grooming of the Western world’s people (especially Americans) in preparation for World War III – which I believe is now imminent.
The Pew
surveys have
found the same thing: In almost all countries surveyed, other than Poland,
public approval of America’s leadership plunged when Trump replaced Obama, and
that low approval stayed down throughout Trump’s Presidency.
Of course, Congress was also culpable in all of these
Robin-Hood-in-reverse policies (protecting Wall Street while abandoning
Main Street),
but the ultimate leadership was at the top, and it was a policy of sheer
hypocrisy. Trump has merely been hypocritical in a different way, and espousing
a different set of excuses for his failures.
Indictments Likely
by Sep. 4th Against Former Obama Administration Officials
Eric Zuesse – August 11, 2020
Here is why federal criminal indictments of former Obama Administration
officials are likely before September 4th:
As I have
previously documented, the case is overwhelming that extremely serious crimes were, in fact, committed and
covered-up, and the only real question now is how high up in the Administration
they went — possibly up to Barack Obama and Joe Biden, but that’s the big
question.
(I need to state here, for the record, that I voted for Barack Obama
both times, though recognized in 2012 that he was the lesser of two evils — I
am not, and never have been, a Republican.)
Democrats are deceived in basically the same way that
Republicans are, but by a different group of billionaires. Both of America’s
political Parties try to get their dupes to donate or subscribe to their
propaganda-media, but will continue operating them regardless, because their
billionaires actually own and advertise in these ‘news’-media, and so
subscribers to those media aren’t really needed, but are just “icing on the
cake.” Their paying subscribers reduce the amount that the Party’s billionaires
will need to spend in order to produce and distribute their propaganda. Here is
a typical example of this:
Noah Shachtman is the Editor-in-Chief of the
Democratic Party billionaires’ Daily Beast ‘news’ site. On 29 October 2018, he
headlined there, "Why The
Daily Beast Matters Now More Than Ever”, and the article sub-headed “Journalism today has to
paint in bright colors, have a sense of wit, and give up any attachments to the
powerful. It’s gonzo or go home.” So, he and his site is “gonzo,” and they
“give up any attachments to the powerful.” At least they say they
do.
He opened:
Maybe Putin’s spies were onto something.
In June 2015 — nine months before targeting the
Hillary Clinton campaign, and a full year before the world learned about their
hacking of the DNC — Russia’s military intelligence division tried to hack the
accounts of journalists, including a number of Daily Beast reporters and
alumni.
(Sure — the reason why Hillary lost isn’t Hillary — it
is Putin! Just like the reason Trump won’t win isn’t Trump — it will be
‘them!’, whomever ‘they’ will be: maybe “Democrats.”)
On
January 12th, Deutsche Welle (Germany’s public broadcaster like BBC, PBS, NPR,
and RT) headlined “Mayor’s resignation highlights
threat to German leaders: Arnd Focke, the Social Democratic mayor
of a town in Lower Saxony, was regularly threatened by nationalists. Now he has
resigned. Regional officials have repeatedly faced threats across Germany.” He
quit for his safety, because carrying out Germany’s compassionate policies
toward the flood of mainly Middle-Eastern refugees has produced a backlash that
is becoming increasingly organized and dangerous to Germany’s democracy.
U.S.
President Barack Obama’s policies in support of overthrowing secular governments
in the Middle East (such as in Libya and Syria), and his attempts to install
there new governments — which were planned to be allied with the Sharia-law,
fundamentalist-Sunni, Saud family, who own Saudi Arabia — caused the exodus,
from those secularly-headed U.S.-attacked Middle-Eastern countries, of
millions, some of which refugees live now in Germany and are not accepted
there, for many of reasons, some valid and some invalid. The resulting influx
of millions of culturally markedly different people has given rise to a rebirth
of Germany’s Nazi movement.
Whereas
Obama’s U.S., and especially now Trump’s U.S., has refused entry of refugees
from these countries, Europe (and especially Germany) has been compassionate
toward them and allowed them in, and are now experiencing the political
blowback, at home, from their admission of refugees from America’s invasions to
overthrow secular governments in the Middle East.
Former US President Barack Obama is now in severe
legal jeopardy, because the Russiagate investigation has turned 180 degrees;
and he, instead of the current President, Donald Trump, is in its cross-hairs.
The biggest crime that a US President can commit is to
try to defeat American democracy (the Constitutional functioning of the US
Government) itself, either by working with foreign powers to take it over, or
else by working internally within America to sabotage democracy for his or her
own personal reasons. Either way, it’s treason (crime that is intended to, and
does, endanger the continued functioning of the Constitution itself*), and Mr.
Obama is now being actively investigated, as possibly having done this. The
Russiagate investigation, which had formerly focused against the current US
President, has reversed direction and now targets the prior President. Although
he, of course, cannot be removed from office (since he is no longer in office),
he is liable under criminal laws, the same as any other American would be, if
he committed any crime while he was in office.
A December 17th
order by the FISA (Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act) Court severely condemned the performance by the FBI
under Obama, for having obtained, on 19 October 2016 (even prior to the US
Presidential election), from that Court, under false pretenses, an
authorization for the FBI to commence investigating Donald Trump’s Presidential
campaign, as being possibly in collusion with Russia’s Government. The Court’s
ruling said:
BY JOHN SOLOMON, OPINION CONTRIBUTOR — 04/25/19 07:00 PM EDT
As Donald Trump began his meteoric rise to the presidency, the Obama White House summoned Ukrainian authorities to Washington to coordinate ongoing anti-corruption efforts inside Russia’s most critical neighbor.
The January 2016 gathering, confirmed by multiple participants and contemporaneous memos, brought some of Ukraine’s top corruption prosecutors and investigators face to face with members of former President Obama’s National Security Council (NSC), FBI, State Department and Department of Justice (DOJ).
The agenda suggested the purpose was training and coordination. But Ukrainian participants said it didn’t take long — during the meetings and afterward — to realize the Americans’ objectives included two politically hot investigations: one that touched Vice President Joe Biden’s family and one that involved a lobbying firm linked closely to then-candidate Trump.
U.S. officials “kept talking about how important it was that all of our anti-corruption efforts be united,” said Andrii Telizhenko, then a political officer in the Ukrainian Embassy in Washington tasked with organizing the meeting.
Telizhenko, who no longer works for the Ukrainian Embassy, said U.S. officials volunteered during the meetings — one of which was held in the White House’s Old Executive Office Building — that they had an interest in reviving a closed investigation into payments to U.S. figures from Ukraine’s Russia-backed Party of Regions.
O Almirante William H. McRaven apresentou ao Secretário da Defesa, a sua demissão
do Conselho Consultivo da Inovação.
Este Conselho foi criado em 1996, pelo Secretário da Defesa, Ash Carter, a fim de tirar o melhor partido das indústrias inovadores de Silicon Valley. Agrupa personalidades da Internet e militares de alta patente.
O Almirante McRaven entrou em oposição frontal com o Presidente Trump, após a revogação deste último, da Habilitação de Segurançaou seja, do acesso aos Serviços Secretos e de Defesa do antigo Director da CIA, John Brennan.Ele publicou, nessa ocasião, um artigo a solicitar a rescisão da sua própria Habilitação de Segurança. Este texto foi publicado pelo Washington Post [1] no mesmo dia em que antigos altos funcionários dos Serviços Secretos também publicaram um texto a apoiar Brennan [2].
Após a publicação de um artigo anónimo anti-Trump no New York Times [3], desta vez atribuído a um alto funcionário da Casa Branca, McRaven foi convidado a demitir-se do Conselho do qual era membro.
O Almirante McRaven tornou-se célebre ao conduzir a operação Tridente de Neptuno (Neptune’s Spear). Teria, supostamente, assassinado Osama Bin Laden na sua casa, em Abbottabad, no Paquistão. Esta operação, encenada pelo Presidente Barack Obama, foi vivamente contestada pelo Paquistão. Primeiro, porque foi levada a cabo, violando a soberania desse país e, em seguida, porque Osama Bin Laden não residia em Abbottabad, mas morreu no Afeganistão, em Dezembro de 2001. Na altura,o Almirante McRaven chefiou as Forças Especiais (US SOCOM). Como tal, foi ouvido em audiência pelo Congresso e revelou, orgulhosamente, comandar assassinatos políticos em 78 países, em todo o mundo. O Presidente Obama encarregou McRaven de formar uma rede com as Forças Especiais Aliadas, de maneira a poder assassinar qualquer pessoa, em qualquer lugar do mundo, em menos de 48 horas. [4]
John O. Brennan percorreu uma longa carreira na CIA até se tornar Director da mesma (2013-17). Desenvolveu, consideravelmente, o programa de assassinatos por drones da Agência. Neste contexto, trabalhou em estreita colaboração com o Almirante McRaven. No entanto, entrou em conflito com o General Michael T. Flynn, dos Serviços Secretos Militares. Designado como primeiro Conselheiro de Segurança Nacional, do Presidente Trump, Flynn mandou, imediatamente, demitir Brennan e tentou reorganizar a CIA, dando prioridade às missões de Serviços Secretos humanos e não mais liquidar os seus inimigos. Então, Brennan liderou a luta política contra Flynn e Trump, acusando-os de serem agentes russos. A sua Habilitação de Segurança foi revogada em 15 de Agosto de 2018.
[4] « La globalisation des Forces spéciales », por Manlio Dinucci, Tradução de Marie-Ange Patrizio, Il Manifesto (Italie), Réseau Voltaire, 13 de Maio de 2014.
Tradutora: Maria Luísa de Vasconcellos
«A ARTE DA GUERRA»
A globalização das forças especiais
Manlio Dinucci
Forças especiais do exército dos EEUU foram criadas para usar suas habilidades militares com foco na realização de operações de guerra não convencionais, principalmente fomentando tumultos ou assassinando opositores políticos. Washington está secretamente implantando tais forças em 78 países e negando sua existência, mesmo enquanto o orçamento para as suas missões excede 10 bilhões de dólares anualmente. A proliferação dessas forças deve permitir que Washington estenda sua ditadura invisível ao redor do globo.
Um único acidente pode às vezes revelar toda uma "guerra secreta". Isso foi o que aconteceu no Iêmen onde, em Sana, um membro das forças especiais dos EUA e um agente da CIA dispararam contra dois homens e os mataram. De acordo com a versão oficial, eles eram dois terroristas da Al Qaeda que tentaram raptá-los. O incidente, claro como o dia, provocou uma onda de protestos contra o governo, já acusado de permitir drones da CIA lançados de uma base Saudita a operar no Iêmen.
Documents Reveal Steele Was Admonished in February,
2016
(Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch announced today the FBI turned
over 70 pages of heavily redacted records about Christopher Steele, the former British
spy, hired with Clinton campaign and Democratic National Committee funds, who
authored the infamous Dossier targeting President Trump during last year’s
presidential campaign. The documents show that Steele was cut off as a
“Confidential Human Source” (CHS) after he disclosed his relationship with the
FBI to a third party. The documents show at least 11 FBI payments to
Steele in 2016 and document that he was admonished for unknown reasons in
February, 2016. The documents were turned over in response to Judicial
Watch Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit against the U.S. Department of Justice for
records of communications and payments between the Federal Bureau of
Investigation (FBI) and former British intelligence officer Christopher Steele
and his private firm, Orbis Business Intelligence (Judicial Watch v. U.S. Department of
Justice(No. 1:17-cv-00916)).
The documents include a “source closing communication”
that states that Steele (referred to as “CHS” or Confidential Human Source) “is
being closed” because:
CHS confirmed to an outside third party that CHS has a
confidential relationship with the FBI. CHS was used as a source for an online
article. In the article, CHS revealed CHS’ relationship with the FBI as well as
information that CHS obtained and provided to FBI. On November 1, 2016, CHS
confirmed all of this to the handling agent. At that time, handling agent
advised CHS that the nature of the relationship between the FBI and CHS would
change completely and that it was unlikely that the FBI would continue a
relationship with the CHS. Additionally, handling agent advised that CHS was
not to operate to obtain any intelligence whatsoever on behalf of the FBI.
The documents also show that Steele was paid
repeatedly by the FBI and was “admonished” for some unknown misconduct in
February, 2016. The documents include:
Although the New York Times says that President Donald Trump lies vastly more than did President Barack Obama, the definite liar in that comparison — based on the factual record, to be presented here — is the New York Times itself. It lies in alleging this, which isn’t to say that either President lies more frequently than the other, but instead, that the Times’s calculation fails to count, at all, but instead altogether ignores, some of President Obama’s very worst lies — ones that were real whoppers. These were lies that were essential to his maintaining support among Democrats (such as the owners of this corporation, the NYT, are), and that would keep Democrats’ support only if they failed to judge him by his actual decisions and actions (such as the NYT’s owners do — or else they secretly know the truth on this, but prevent this truth from being published by their employees). Even to the present day, Obama is evaluated by Democrats on the basis of his lies instead of on the basis of his actions. He’s admired for his stated intentions and promises, which were often the opposite of what his consistent actual decisions and actions turned out to be on those very same matters, on which he had, in retrospect, quite clearly lied (though that was covered-up at the time — and still is).
Discurso do Presidente da Rússia, Vladimir Putin, na manhã do dia 24 de Fevereiro de 2022
Discurso do Presidente da Rússia, Vladimir Putin, Tradução em português
Presidente da Rússia, Vladimir Putin: Cidadãos da Rússia, Amigos,
Considero ser necessário falar hoje, de novo, sobre os trágicos acontecimentos em Donbass e sobre os aspectos mais importantes de garantir a segurança da Rússia.
Começarei com o que disse no meu discurso de 21 de Fevereiro de 2022. Falei sobre as nossas maiores responsabilidades e preocupações e sobre as ameaças fundamentais que os irresponsáveis políticos ocidentais criaram à Rússia de forma continuada, com rudeza e sem cerimónias, de ano para ano. Refiro-me à expansão da NATO para Leste, que está a aproximar cada vez mais as suas infraestruturas militares da fronteira russa.
É um facto que, durante os últimos 30 anos, temos tentado pacientemente chegar a um acordo com os principais países NATO, relativamente aos princípios de uma segurança igual e indivisível, na Europa. Em resposta às nossas propostas, enfrentámos invariavelmente, ou engano cínico e mentiras, ou tentativas de pressão e de chantagem, enquanto a aliança do Atlântico Norte continuou a expandir-se, apesar dos nossos protestos e preocupações. A sua máquina militar está em movimento e, como disse, aproxima-se da nossa fronteira.
Porque é que isto está a acontecer? De onde veio esta forma insolente de falar que atinge o máximo do seu excepcionalismo, infalibilidade e permissividade? Qual é a explicação para esta atitude de desprezo e desdém pelos nossos interesses e exigências absolutamente legítimas?
/https://www.niagarafallsreview.ca/content/dam/thestar/news/canada/2021/09/25/huawei-executive-meng-wanzhou-receives-warm-welcome-upon-return-to-china/_1_meng_wanzhou_2.jpg)
