GIULIETTO CHIESA

FREE JULIAN ASSANGE

WWIII + S SITE

 

CROATIAN   ENGLISH   GREEK   NEDERLANDS   POLSKI   PORTUGUESE   ROMANIAN  SPANISH  РУССКИЙ

What part will your country play in World War III?

By Larry Romanoff

The true origins of the two World Wars have been deleted from all our history books and replaced with mythology. Neither War was started (or desired) by Germany, but both at the instigation of a group of European Zionist Jews with the stated intent of the total destruction of Germany. The documentation is overwhelming and the evidence undeniable. (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11)

That history is being repeated today in a mass grooming of the Western world’s people (especially Americans) in preparation for World War IIIwhich I believe is now imminent

READ MORE

 
 
Showing posts with label Elijah J. Magnier. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Elijah J. Magnier. Show all posts

Monday, February 24, 2020

ELIJAH J. MAGNIER -- THE WAR SCENARIO BETWEEN ISRAEL AND HEZBOLLAH



THE WAR SCENARIO BETWEEN ISRAEL AND HEZBOLLAH

Posted on 24/02/2020 by Elijah J Magnier
By Elijah J. Magnier: @ejmalrai
Notwithstanding the increase in power of the “Axis of the Resistance”, with its precision missiles and unrivalled accumulated warfare experience, the possibility of war is still on the table. The “Axis of the Resistance” is increasing its readiness based on the possibility that Israel may not tolerate the presence of such a serious threat on its northern borders and therefore act to remove it. However, in any future war, the “Axis of the Resistance” considers the consequences would be overwhelmingly devastating for both sides and on all levels if the rules of engagement are not respected. Notwithstanding Israel’s superior air firepower, its enemy Hezbollah has established its own tremendous firepower, and its experience in recent wars in Syria, Iraq and Yemen is an important asset.
Sources within the “Axis of the Resistance” believe the next battle between Hezbollah and Israel, if ever it takes place, would be “controlled and not sporadic, with a focus on specific military objectives without damaging the infrastructure, on both sides”.

Elijah J Magnier -- POSSIBILI SCENARI DI GUERRA TRA ISRAELE E HEZBOLLAH



Middle East Politics

 POSSIBILI SCENARI DI GUERRA TRA ISRAELE E HEZBOLLAH 
Posted on 24/02/2020 by Elijah J Magnier
Di Elijah J. Magnier: @ejmalrai
Tradotto da Alice Censi 
Malgrado il crescente potere dell’ “Asse della Resistenza”, i suoi missili di precisione e l’impareggiabile esperienza bellica  accumulata, il rischio che si verifichi un conflitto persiste. L’ “Asse della Resistenza” aumenta i suoi preparativi in base alla possibilità che Israele, non sopportando la presenza di questa seria minaccia sul suo confine settentrionale, cerchi di eliminarla. L’ “Asse della Resistenza” ritiene comunque che qualsiasi guerra futura avrebbe delle conseguenze terribilmente  devastanti per tutti e a tutti i livelli se non venissero rispettate le regole di ingaggio. Anche se Israele ha un potere di fuoco superiore, quello del suo nemico, Hezbollah, non è assolutamente da sottovalutare, senza contare la notevole esperienza acquisita dall’organizzazione libanese nelle guerre recenti in Siria, Iraq e Yemen. 
Fonti interne all’ “Asse della Resistenza” sono convinte che il prossimo scontro tra Hezbollah e Israele, se mai avverrà, sarà “controllato e non sporadico e si focalizzerà su obbiettivi militari specifici senza creare danni alle infrastrutture di entrambi”. 

Thursday, February 20, 2020

Elijah J. Magnier -- ES DESACERTADO PARA IRÁN FINANCIAR A SUS ALIADOS REGIONALES MIENTRAS PERMANECE BAJO SANCIONES?

ES DESACERTADO PARA IRÁN FINANCIAR A SUS ALIADOS REGIONALES MIENTRAS PERMANECE BAJO SANCIONES?
Posted on 20/02/2020 by Elijah J Magnier
Por Elijah J. Magnier:@ejmalrai
Muchos iraníes cuestionan los beneficios de armar y financiar a los múltiples aliados de Irán en el Medio Oriente, mientras sufre la campaña de “máxima presión” de la forma más severa; como nunca. Sus aliados están esparcidos en Afganistán, Yemen, Irak, Siria, el Líbano y Palestina. ¿Es este apoyo la principal causa de la actitud agresiva de los Estados Unidos hacia el pueblo iraní y su estado, o existen otros factores? ¿Qué hace que Irán financie y fortalezca a estos aliados con los equipos de guerra más avanzados, y que estén listos para pelear y morir en sus propios territorios?
Desde que la “Revolución Islámica” prevaleció en 1979 bajo el liderazgo del Imán Jomeini, el país ha estado bajo sanciones pesadas, mismas que aumentan con la llegada de casi cada uno de los nuevos presidentes estadounidenses. En 1979, Irán no tenía aliados y estaba rodeada de enemigos. Sus vecinos en la región se sumaron al apoyo occidental a la guerra de Saddam Hussein contra la “República Islámica”. La guerra de los Estados Unidos contra Irán tiene su origen en la caída de su subordinado, el Shah Pahlevi. Se ha revelado cómo la CIA llevó a Pahlevi al poder en un golpe de estado organizado contra el primer ministro Mohammed Mossadeq, en 1953, para mantener el petróleo iraní bajo control británico y estadounidense. La democracia nunca ha sido una preocupación real: las guerras provocadas por Occidente pueden entenderse como motivadas por los intereses y la búsqueda por la dominación. Pero Occidente siempre justifica sus intentos por derrocar en nombre de la libertad y la democracia.  
En 1979, Estados Unidos tendió una trampa para arrastrar a los soviéticos para que invadieran Afganistán, apoyando a los muyajedín de donde luego nació Al-Qaeda. Este resultado catastrófico y fenómenos destructivos similares se acostumbran a describirlos como “consecuencias involuntarias” para poder racionalizar los costos que estas intervenciones salvajes traen contra la vida de otros pueblos y en los asuntos mundiales. Sin embargo, en 2001 los Estados Unidos cayeron exactamente en el mismo tipo de tremedal e invadieron Afganistán con decenas de miles de tropas. El plan estadounidense consistía en bloquear el camino a un posible retorno de Rusia a Eurasia; debilitar a los rusos y cercar a Irán con una cadena de elementos hostiles; e intimidar a todos los países preocupados con estas acciones hacia la sumisión, en particular los estados ricos en petróleo, de este modo previniendo cualquier alianza posible con Rusia y China. Este sigue siendo el objetivo de los Estados Unidos en el Medio Oriente. La historia nunca ha sido una guía eficiente para los líderes poderosos y sus administraciones, porque aparentemente se consideran a sí mismos como exentos a estas lecciones.

IS IRAN ILL-ADVISED TO FINANCE ITS REGIONAL ALLIES WHILE UNDER SANCTIONS?


IS IRAN ILL-ADVISED TO FINANCE ITS REGIONAL ALLIES WHILE UNDER SANCTIONS?
Imagem
By Elijah J. Magnier:@ejmalrai
Many Iranians question the benefits of arming and financing Iran’s many allies in the Middle East while Iran is suffering the harshest ever US “maximum pressure”. Iran’s allies are spread over Afghanistan, Yemen, Iraq, Syria, Lebanon and Palestine. Is Iranian support for these allies the main cause of the US’s aggressive attitude towards the Iranian people and their state, or there are other factors? What makes Iran finance these allies and strengthen them with the most advanced warfare equipment, and be ready to fight and die on their territory?
Since Iran’s “Islamic Revolution” prevailed in 1979 under the leadership of Imam Khomeini, the country has been heavily sanctioned, sanctions increasing with the advent of almost every new US President. In 1979, Iran had no allies but was surrounded by enemies.  Its regional neighbours joined western countries in supporting Saddam Hussein’s war (1980-1988) on the “Islamic Republic”. The US war on Iran has its origin in the fall of its proxy the Pahlavi Shah. It was disclosed how the CIA brought Pahlavi to power in an organised Coup d’état against the democratically elected Prime Minister Mohamad Musaddeq in 1953 in order to keep Iranian oil under US-UK control. Democracy has never been the real issue: western-provoked wars can be understood as motivated by self-interest and the quest for dominance. But attempts to overthrow regimes are always publicly justified by the West in the name of freedom and democracy.
In 1979, the US set a trap to drag the Soviets into invading Afghanistan by supporting the mujahedeen from whom al-Qaeda was born. This catastrophic result and similar destructive phenomena are habitually described as “unintended consequences” in order to rationalise the devastating costs of these savage interventions into other people’s lives and in world affairs. However, in 2001 the US fell back into exactly the same type of quagmire and invaded Afghanistan with tens of thousands of US troops. The US plan was to block the path of a possible return by Russia to Eurasia; to weaken the Russians and to encircle Iran with a chain of hostile elements; to bully all countries concerned into submission, particularly the oil-rich states, thus preventing any possible alliance with Russia and China. This is still the US objective in the Middle East. History has never been a good guide to powerful leaders and their administrations because they apparently consider themselves not subject to its lessons.

Thursday, February 13, 2020

Elijah J. Magnier -- Syria Imposes the Astana Deal by Force as Turkish, Russian Tensions Rise

Syria Imposes the Astana Deal by Force as Turkish, Russian Tensions Rise

Since 2012 the M5 Damascus-Aleppo had been under the control of jihadist forces. The Syrian Army has now liberated the M5 Damascus-Aleppo road and over 140 cities, villages and strategic hills. Turkey and the Uzbeks, Uighurs and Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (formerly al-Nusra) failed to protect their fortified positions, abandoning them and retreating towards the area surrounding Idlib.
This is the first time the Turkish Army has been shelled by the Syrian Army. Five Turkish officers were killed at Taftanaz military airport, the base used by Turkey and its jihadists gather. Ankara was forced to send its own army onto the battlefield to compensate for the weakness of its jihadist allies on the ground.
The liberation of the 432 km of the M5 from jihadists was stipulated in the Astana agreement signed in October 2018, a stipulation which Turkey failed to honour since then. The Syrian government carried out three major advances towards the M5 since then, but this time the decision to recover it was final. This is a Syrian-Russian message to President Erdogan that time is running out for Idlib. The Turkish-Russian bras-de-fer is also reaching beyond the Syrian borders. It is also evident in Ukraine and Libya, where Turkey is seeking a major role.
The Russians are providing the Syrian Army with advanced warfare equipment and dozens of T-90s, which help the Army to continue its military offensives at night. This, along with the hundreds of Russian Air Force strikes, helped to liberate the entire area on the east side of the road and many other areas on the west side where the military operation continues. Moreover, Russia offered unparalleled military intelligence and planning support to the Syrian Army in this successful operation, as well as bombing the jihadists’ lines, and behind their retreat position as well.
What was surprising was the discovery of kilometres of underground tunnels with field hospitals, ammunition and life support goods that could have sustained a very long siege in all liberated areas on both sides of the M5 and in main cities like Saraqeb and El-Eiss. These tunnels were linked together, linking villages under the ground and some even 20 metres deep, enough to protect from air bombardment. The Jihadists were in a rush–they evacuated all these positions leaving everything behind.

Manifestações

2007 Speech

UKRAINE ON FIRE

Discurso do Presidente da Rússia, Vladimir Putin, na manhã do dia 24 de Fevereiro de 2022

Discurso do Presidente da Rússia, Vladimir Putin, Tradução em português




Presidente da Rússia, Vladimir Putin: Cidadãos da Rússia, Amigos,

Considero ser necessário falar hoje, de novo, sobre os trágicos acontecimentos em Donbass e sobre os aspectos mais importantes de garantir a segurança da Rússia.

Começarei com o que disse no meu discurso de 21 de Fevereiro de 2022. Falei sobre as nossas maiores responsabilidades e preocupações e sobre as ameaças fundamentais que os irresponsáveis políticos ocidentais criaram à Rússia de forma continuada, com rudeza e sem cerimónias, de ano para ano. Refiro-me à expansão da NATO para Leste, que está a aproximar cada vez mais as suas infraestruturas militares da fronteira russa.

É um facto que, durante os últimos 30 anos, temos tentado pacientemente chegar a um acordo com os principais países NATO, relativamente aos princípios de uma segurança igual e indivisível, na Europa. Em resposta às nossas propostas, enfrentámos invariavelmente, ou engano cínico e mentiras, ou tentativas de pressão e de chantagem, enquanto a aliança do Atlântico Norte continuou a expandir-se, apesar dos nossos protestos e preocupações. A sua máquina militar está em movimento e, como disse, aproxima-se da nossa fronteira.

Porque é que isto está a acontecer? De onde veio esta forma insolente de falar que atinge o máximo do seu excepcionalismo, infalibilidade e permissividade? Qual é a explicação para esta atitude de desprezo e desdém pelos nossos interesses e exigências absolutamente legítimas?

Read more

ARRIVING IN CHINA

Ver a imagem de origem

APPEAL


APPEAL TO THE LEADERS OF THE NINE NUCLEAR WEAPONS' STATES

(China, France, India, Israel, North Korea, Pakistan, Russia, the United Kingdom and the United States)

中文 DEUTSCH ENGLISH FRANÇAIS ITALIAN PORTUGUESE RUSSIAN SPANISH ROMÂNA

manlio + maria

MOON OF SHANGHAI site

LR on CORONAVIRUS

LARRY ROMANOFF on CORONAVIRUS

Read more at Moon of Shanghai

World Intellectual Property Day (or Happy Birthday WIPO) - Spruson ...


Moon of Shanghai

L Romanoff

Larry Romanoff,

contributing author

to Cynthia McKinney's new COVID-19 anthology

'When China Sneezes'

When China Sneezes: From the Coronavirus Lockdown to the Global Politico-Economic Crisis

manlio

James Bacque

BYOBLU

irmãos de armas


Subtitled in PT, RO, SP

Click upon CC and choose your language.


manlio

VP




Before the Presidential Address to the Federal Assembly.



The President of Russia delivered
the Address to the Federal Assembly. The ceremony took
place at the Manezh Central Exhibition Hall.


January
15, 2020


vp

President of Russia Vladimir Putin:

Address to the Nation

Address to the Nation.

READ HERE


brics


Imagem

PT -- VLADIMIR PUTIN na Sessão plenária do Fórum Económico Oriental

Excertos da transcrição da sessão plenária do Fórum Económico Oriental

THE PUTIN INTERVIEWS


The Putin Interviews
by Oliver Stone (
FULL VIDEOS) EN/RU/SP/FR/IT/CH


http://tributetoapresident.blogspot.com/2018/07/the-putin-interviews-by-oliver-stone.html




TRIBUTE TO A PRESIDENT


NA PRMEIRA PESSOA

Um auto retrato surpreendentemente sincero do Presidente da Rússia, Vladimir Putin

CONTEÚDO

Prefácio

Personagens Principais em 'Na Primeira Pessoa'

Parte Um: O Filho

Parte Dois: O Estudante

Parte Três: O Estudante Universitário

Parte Quatro: O Jovem especialista

Parte Cinco: O Espia

Parte Seis: O Democrata

Parte Sete: O Burocrata

Parte Oito: O Homem de Família

Parte Nove: O Político

Apêndice: A Rússia na Viragem do Milénio


contaminação nos Açores



Subtitled in EN/PT

Click upon the small wheel at the right side of the video and choose your language.


convegno firenze 2019