The true origins of the two World Wars have been deleted from all our history books and replaced with mythology. Neither War was started (or desired) by Germany, but both at the instigation of a group of European Zionist Jews with the stated intent of the total destruction of Germany. The documentation is overwhelming and the evidence undeniable. (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11)
That history is being repeated today in a mass grooming of the Western world’s people (especially Americans) in preparation for World War III – which I believe is now imminent.
O ano 2014, para
Washington e para a sua Aliança transatlântica, arrisca-se a ser um ano negro,
sobretudo em dois cenários: Uma Europa sem guerra onde, não obstante a expansão
da NATO para Leste, as ligações económicas e políticas
entre a União Europeia e a Rússia estão a reforçar-se e, onde quase todos os aliados estão
relutantes em aumentar a despesa militar ao nível requerido pelo Pentágono; um
Médio Oriente onde a guerra USA/NATO está a falhar na Síria e o Iraque
está a distanciar-se dos USA e a aproximar-se da China e da Rússia, cuja
aliança é sempre temida pela Casa Branca. Washington é avisado, cada vez com
mais urgência, da necessidade de encontrar uma «nova missão» para a NATO. Ela é encontrada pontualmente.
O putsch da Praça
Maidan, preparado desde há muito pelo treino de forças neonazis ucranianas,
leva a Europa a uma situação análoga à da guerra fria, provocando um novo
confronto com a Rússia. A ofensiva do ISIS, preparada com o financiamento e
armamento de grupos islâmicos (alguns dos quais eram designados antes como
terroristas) acabada a guerra contra a Jugoslávia e a guerra contra a Líbia,
permite às forças USA/NATO intervirem no Médio Oriente para destruir, não o
ISIS, mas a Síria e para reocupar o Iraque.
A «nova missão» da NATO é oficializada na Cimeira de Setembro de 2014, no País de Gales, lançando o «Readiniess
Action Plan», cujo objectivo oficial é de «responder, rápida e firmemente, aos
novos desafios à segurança», atribuídos à «agressão militar da Rússia contra a
Ucrânia» e ao «aumento do extremismo e dos conflitos sectários no Médio Oriente
e no Norte de África». O plano é definido pelo Secretário Geral da NATO, Jens
Stoltenberg, como «o maior reforço da nossa defesa colectiva desde o fim da guerra
fria».
Em apenas três meses, a
NATO quadriplica os caça-bombardeiros, duplica a capacidade convencional e
nuclear, implantada na região báltica (antes parte da URSS); envia radares
aéreos AWACS para a Europa Oriental e aumenta o número dos navios de guerra no Mar
Báltico, Mar Negro e no Mediterrâneo; instala na Polónia, Estónia, Letónia e
Lituânia forças terrestres americanas, britânicas e alemãs; intensifica os exercícios conjuntos na Polónia e nos Países Bálticos, aumentando-os para mais
de 200.
A partir desse momento, a
pressão USA/NATO sobre a Rússia cresce em progressão geométrica.Em quatro anos,
de 2014 a 2018, os EUA gastam 10 biliões de dólares na «Iniciativa de Segurança
da Europa» (ERI), cujo objectivo oficial é «aumentar a nossa capacidade de
defender a Europa contra a agressão russa». Quase metade da despesa serve para potenciar o «pré-posicionamento estratégico» USA na Europa, ou seja, os
depósitos de armamento que, colocados em posição avançada, permitem «uma rápida
deslocação das forças armadas no teatro bélico». Outra grande parte é destinada
a «aumentar a presença, com base rotativa, das forças americanas em toda a
Europa». As porções restantes servem para o desenvolvimento das
infra-estruturas das bases na Europa para «aumentar a prontidão da acção USA», à potencialização dos exercícios militares e ao treino para «aumentar a
prontidão e a capacidade de interacção das forças da NATO».
Os fundos da ERI –
esclarece o Comando Europeu dos Estados Unidos - são apenas uma parte dos que
estão destinados à «Operação Atlantic Resolve, que demonstra a capacidade USA
de responder às ameaças contra os aliados». No âmbito dessas operações, é
transferida de Fort Carson (Colorado), para a Polónia,em Janeiro de 2017, a 3ª
Brigada couraçada, composta de 3.500 homens, 87 tanques, 18 obuseiros de
auto-lançamento, 144 veículos de combate Bradley, mais 400 Humvees (Veículos Automóveis Multifunções de Alta Mobilidade) e 2.000 veículos de transporte. A 3ª Brigada couraçada será substituída a
seguir por outra unidade, assim as forças couraçadas americanas são permanentemente
deslocadas no território polaco. Os seus departamentos são transferidos,
para treinos e exercícios, para outros países de Leste, sobretudo para a
Estónia, Letónia, Lituânia, Bulgária, Roménia e mesmo Ucrânia, ou seja, são
continuamente deslocados à volta da Rússia.
Sempre no contexto de
tais operações, é transferida para a base de Illesheim (na Alemanha) de Fort
Drum (em New York), a 10ª Brigada Aére de Combate, com mais de 2.000 homens e uma centena de
helicópteros de guerra. De Illesheim, duas 'task force' são enviadaspara «posições avançadas» na Polónia, Roménia
e Letónia. Nas bases de Ämari (Estónia) e Graf Ignatievo (Bulgária), são
distribuídos caça-bombardeiros USA e NATO, compreendendo Eurofighter italianos,
para o «patrulhamento aéreo» do Báltico. A operação prevê, também, «uma presença
continuada no Mar Negro», na base aérea de Kogalniceanu (Roménia) e na de
treino de Novo Selo (Bulgária).
O General Curtis
Scaparrotti, Chefe do Comando Europeu dos EUA e, ao mesmo tempo, Comandante
Supremo Aliado na Europa, assegura que «as nossas forças estão preparadas e
posicionadas para barrar a agressão russa». Um contingente USA é posicionado
na Polónia oriental, no designado «Suwalki Gap», um trecho de terreno plano com
cerca de cem quilómetros de comprimento que, avisa a NATO, «seria uma passagem
perfeita para os tanques russos». É, assim, desenterrado o armamento da propaganda da velha guerra fria: o dos tanques russos prontos para invadirem a Europa. Agitando o fantasma de
uma ameaça do Leste, que não existe, chegam de facto à Europa os tanques dos
Estados Unidos.
O plano é claro. Depois
de ter provocado com o putsch da Praça Maidan, um novo confronto com a Rússia, Washington (não obstante a
mudança de Administração do Presidente Obama pela do Presidente Trump) segue a
mesma estratégia: transformar a Europa na primeira linha de uma nova guerra
fria, com vantagem para os interesses dos Estados Unidos e para as suas relações de
forças com as maiores potências europeias.
Na instalação no flanco
oriental – compreendendo forças couraçadas, caça-bombardeiros, navios de guerra
e unidades de mísseis nucleares – participam as potências europeias da NATO,
como demonstra o envio de tropas francesas e de tanques britânicos para a
Estónia. Fala-se, neste período, de um «exército» europeu, mas no encontro dos
Ministros de Defesa da União Europeia, em Abril de 2017, em Malta, o Secretário
Geral da NATO, Stoltenberg, esclarece em que termos: «Ficou claramente
estabelecido, da parte da União Europeia, que o seu objectivo não é constituir
um novo exército europeu ou estrutura de comando em competição com a NATO,
mas algo que seja complementar ao que a NATO faz».
O Art. 42 do Tratado da
União Europeia estabelece que «a política da União respeita as obrigações de
alguns Estados membros, os quais consideram que a sua defesa comum se realiza
através da Organização do Tratado do Atlântico Norte». Visto que são membros da
Aliança, 22 dos 28 países da União Europeia (21 em 27 com a saída da Grã Bretanha da UE),
torna-se evidente o predomínio da NATO. Para evitar equívocos, o protocolo nr.
10 sobre a cooperação instituída pelo art. 42 sublinha que a NATO «permanece o
fundamento da defesa colectiva» da União Europeia, e que «um desempenho mais
forte da União em matéria de segurança e defesa, contribuirá para a
vitalidade de uma Aliança Atlântica renovada». O bastão do comando permanece,
portanto, do Comandante Supremo Aliado na Europa, um general americano nomeado
pelo Presidente dos Estados Unidos.
Para reforçar mais ainda,
a sua influência na Europa, os Estados Unidos promovem a «Iniciativa dos três Mares»,
que é lançada em Julho de 2017, na ocasião da visita do Presidente Trump a
Varsóvia. A Polónia, definida pela Casa Branca como um país «fiel aliado NATO e
um dos mais intímos amigos da América» é a ponta de lança da estratégia
USA/NATO que arrastou a Europa para uma nova guerra fria com a Rússia. Aos olhos
de Washington, ela tem todas as características para assumir outra tarefa
exigente, a de orientar a «Iniciativa Três Mares», um novo projecto que reúne
12 países compreendidos entre o Mar Báltico, o Mar Negro e o Mar Adriático:
Polónia, Lituânia, Letónia, Estónia, Hungria, República Checa, Austria,
Bulgária, Roménia, Croácia, Eslováquia e Eslovénia. Estes países são membros da
União Europeia e ao mesmo tempo, todos eles, excepto a Austria, são membros da
NATO sob comando USA, mais ligados a Washington do que a Bruxelas. O objectivo oficial
do novo projecto é «ligar as economias e as infra-estruturas da Europa Central
e Oriental, de Norte a Sul, alargando a cooperação nos sectores da energia, dos
transportes, das comunicações digitais e da economia, em geral, para tornar a
Europa Central e Oriental mais segura e competitiva». Os EUA pensam isso. No
seu discurso na Conferência dos Três Mares, o Presidente Trump «concentra-se no
desenvolvimento das infra-estruturas e na segurança energética, evidenciando,
entre outras, as primeiras expedições do LNG (gás natural liquefeito) americano
para a Polónia.». Um terminal no porto báltico de Swinoujscie, custando cerca
de um bilião de dólares, permite à Polónia importar LNG americano na medida
inicial de 5 biliões de metros cúbicos/ano. Através deste e de outros
terminais, entre os quais um projectado na Croácia, o gás proveniente dos USA ou
de outros países através de companhias americanas, será distribuído através de
gasodutos especiais para toda a «região dos Três Mares». O objectivo do plano é
claro: atacar a Rússia, fazendo diminuir a sua exportação de gás na Europa
(objectivo realizável apenas se a exportação do gás USA, mais cara do que o
russo, for incentivada com fortes subsídios estatais) ligar ainda mais aos EUA,
a Europa Central e Oriental, não só militarmente, mas também economicamente, em
concorrência com a Alemanha e outras potências europeias. Assim, o objectivo do
plano, é criar dentro da Europa, uma macro região (a dos Três Mares) de soberania
limitada, directamente sob a influência USA, que acabe, de facto, com a União
Europeia e se alargue à Ucrânia e mais além.
Nota da Tradutora: Eis a concretização da «Iniciativa dos Três Mares» a ocorrer neste momento, nos Estados Unidos:
Transcrição automática: Pode ser obtida como legendas automáticas clicando sobre a roda dentada e escolhendo legendas. Existe uma opção de tradução automática, mas se as legendas automáticas não são 100% fiáveis, menos será a tradução.
00:00 allies and trustful allies and because
00:04
of that we are sure that their reforms
00:07
of NATO which we are investing together
00:09
and preparing together will be result
00:12
ative as it was before but especially
00:14
now because we see in United States
00:17
leadership we seeing the willingness of
00:19
the United States to see different NATO
00:21
different quality of NATO and I can be
00:24
probably open we talked to the president
00:26
I will joke a little bit joking about
00:28
that we need leadership sometimes for
00:31
decision-making even unpredictable
00:33
leadership to make enough leverage and
00:35
pressure for the rivals to believe that
00:38
we can make a decision and as we seeing
00:42
this kind of leadership in president
00:45
Trump and this is good because without
00:48
the leverage and pressure there will be
00:51
no additional spendings
00:52
in our defence in NATO there will be no
00:55
additional decisions for rotating
00:58
military forces or United States in our
01:01
countries there will be no willingness
01:05
to look into the matter of air defense
01:08
which we need very much so from all this
01:10
point of views we trust that our partner
01:14
and Ally is investing seriously in
01:18
future our defence not only our regions
01:21
but the NATO's territory defense and in
01:25
the peace and security of the world as
01:27
it was before
01:28
of course the businesses are coming
01:31
together Ally in military cooperation in
01:34
goes with Economic Cooperation and I am
01:37
very happy there today in our business
01:39
forum we will sign two agreements with
01:42
two American companies on the on the
01:44
liquid gas cooperation Lavinia has
01:46
liquid gas station and factory so-called
01:52
floating boat but we can be independent
01:56
all three Baltic States on the gas
01:58
supply because of that and this gives us
02:00
strength and possibility to make our own
02:04
decisions not to depend on one supplier
02:07
and American liquid gas welcomed on time
02:11
and
02:12
make us more independent in our decision
02:15
making and diversifies our gas supply
02:19
and this is about a real friendship
02:21
about a real cooperation between our
02:24
region and United States and this comes
02:27
also together with the trade matters
02:29
where today we see some discussions on
02:32
the wealth level between United States
02:35
and European Union we together with the
02:39
decisions that the thread needs to be
02:41
useful and equally fair to all sides
02:45
there is no sense to go to the war but
02:47
decisions if there is disbalances need
02:50
to be fine and this we will support as a
02:53
layer of United States so together with
02:57
international obligations in military
02:59
together with a cooperation in economy
03:02
together with with the United States and
03:05
European Union in solving the trade
03:08
disputes and issues we are standing with
03:11
and together and we hope that as
03:13
president said next hangar chairs will
03:16
be even better closer together and we
03:19
will be able to achieve and make more
03:21
thank you
03:31
the Baltic US president summits
03:38
overheard commitment to fundamental
03:41
values our long lasting friendship and
03:44
the steadfast partnership that we have
03:47
enjoyed for nearly a century the United
03:51
States of America is our closest friend
03:55
and Ally I appreciate that we have each
03:59
other's mutual support
04:02
you know endeavours as well as in the
04:06
security challenges we are facing today
04:11
we reflected on our many achievements
04:14
and set a course for our future
04:19
undertakings we have agreed to enhance
04:23
our defense and
04:25
purity cooperation the Baltic states
04:27
appreciate the United States commitment
04:30
to deterrence policy in the Baltic
04:35
region and the military assistance
04:37
provided to our forces we will continue
04:41
to commit 2% of GDP
04:45
towards the development of our military
04:48
capabilities for the purposes of both
04:51
strengthening NATO posture in the
04:55
eastern flank and contributing to
04:59
international security the Baltic states
05:04
and the United States acknowledged the
05:08
need to continue the successful existing
05:12
cooperation we have encountered in
05:16
modern day security threats such as
05:19
terrorism cyber and informational
05:24
warfare and nuclear proliferation today
05:29
all of us committed to placing greater
05:33
emphasis on advancing our economic and
05:37
trade and investment relationship we
05:41
recognize great potential in areas of
05:44
innovation modern technologies and the
05:48
digital economy and we will explore
05:52
possibilities for forging new
05:54
partnerships to descend I am
05:58
particularly proud of successes of
06:00
latvian companies that have generated
06:04
more than 2,000 jobs in the u.s. in
06:09
georgia in north carolina in california
06:13
it's it just shows how important is this
06:17
economic cooperation and finally the
06:23
Baltic States and the United States
06:25
agreed to continue promoting closer
06:29
people-to-people contacts because these
06:34
contacts are very important for every
06:39
of our society oh and let me stress that
06:48
President Trump was an outstanding host
06:53
today thanks for hosting us in this for
06:59
us in this very important event when we
07:03
celebrate 100 years anniversary of our
07:07
statehood thanks Thank You president
07:13
Trump my dear neighbors journalists I
07:16
would like to thank President Trump and
07:18
his administration for his political
07:21
leadership in our region and for the
07:24
very visible commitment which has been
07:26
demonstrated through a number of
07:28
high-level visits also to our region
07:31
this year will you celebrate indeed our
07:34
centennial anniversary of these hundred
07:37
years 450 we were occupied by the Soviet
07:41
Union and people in our country got up
07:43
every morning knowing that there are
07:46
democratic countries led by United
07:49
States who have never recognized the
07:52
occupation of the Baltic States our
07:54
national flag the blue black and white
07:57
was waving here in America throughout
08:00
these years it couldn't have been done
08:02
at that time in Estonia
08:05
it was hot warming it was true sign of
08:07
friendship we knew it back then and we
08:10
remember it and we are still grateful
08:12
for it will be forever today I we agree
08:15
the declaration also reminding us about
08:18
the foundations of our relations my
08:20
friends here spoke a lot about what we
08:22
do it's always worth to remind why we do
08:25
this we believe that peace security and
08:28
prosperity depend on strong sovereign
08:30
nations that respect their citizens at
08:33
home and cooperate to promote peace
08:35
abroad our partnership is based on
08:39
principles of democracy and individual
08:41
liberty and the rule of law these things
08:44
are extremely important today we stand
08:49
together like-minded partners and allies
08:53
yes Baltic states are quite small but
08:56
they are important because of their
08:58
location but not only because of what we
09:01
do as contributing partners to the
09:04
global security we find it very
09:07
important to contribute in the
09:09
counter-terrorist fight we find it
09:12
important since 2011 to spend 2 percent
09:14
of GDP on defense we find it extremely
09:19
important to remember that we stand
09:22
together and we form something which we
09:24
call in my office and axis of good this
09:27
is an axis of good made visible for you
09:30
all yessss Estonia and the United States
09:33
are very different by the size of their
09:35
economy but when we are speaking about
09:37
digital economies then this doesn't
09:39
matter anymore
09:40
Estonia is a one of the world leading
09:44
nations of digital governments and our
09:47
companies are working with companies in
09:49
your country to make sure that people
09:51
elsewhere could benefit this cannot come
09:53
without cyber security there is a need
09:56
to center of excellence on cyber
09:58
security in Estonia because we have been
10:00
attacked on cyber long before anybody
10:03
else we still work together we
10:05
contribute and we hope that we are
10:07
really helpful to all of our partners
10:09
yes we have also more conventional trade
10:12
which we do together people in Walmart
10:14
going for their pre-ordered packages in
10:16
a couple of years will see them
10:18
delivered by a stone and made package
10:20
delivery robots we are proud of this and
10:22
we also proud of our legal environment
10:25
in Estonia which invites business to try
10:27
and test new ideas in our place which is
10:30
tiny and then upscale when it makes more
10:33
sense top scale this way we work
10:35
together both on defence matters
10:37
economic matters and always stand on a
10:40
common value base this is the foundation
10:43
of all the relations thank you for today
10:45
for making this visible this axis of
10:47
good thank you very much very much we'll
10:51
take a few questions
10:53
we're going to also have questions
10:54
specifically for the Baltics Steve
10:59
Reuters
11:01
Thank You mr. president some of your
11:03
military advisors are urging you to keep
11:05
a contingent of
11:06
US troops in Syria to ensure the defeat
11:09
of Isis what is your current thinking on
11:11
the subject you still want them out and
11:13
secondly could you clarify what you
11:15
meant about having US military guards
11:17
the US border along with Mexico thank
11:19
you sir
11:19
yeah the first of all the border the
11:23
Mexican border is very unprotected by
11:26
our laws we have horrible horrible and
11:28
very unsafe laws in the United States
11:30
and we're going to be able to do
11:33
something about that hopefully soon
11:34
hopefully Congress will get their act
11:36
together and get in and create some very
11:39
powerful laws like Mexico has and like
11:41
Canada has and like almost all countries
11:44
if we don't have laws we have catch and
11:46
release you catch and then you
11:47
immediately release and people come back
11:50
years later for a court case except they
11:51
virtually never come back so what we are
11:54
preparing for the military to secure our
11:58
border between Mexico and the United
12:00
States we have a meeting on it in a
12:02
little while with general mattis and
12:04
everybody and I think that it's
12:07
something we have to do now the caravan
12:09
which is over a thousand people coming
12:13
in from Honduras thought they were going
12:14
to just walk right through Mexico and
12:16
right through the border as you know
12:19
NAFTA is a phenomenal deal for Mexico
12:22
it's been a horrible deal for the United
12:23
States we're renegotiating it now but it
12:26
has been a horrible horrible
12:27
embarrassing deal for the United States
12:29
this should have been terminated or
12:31
renegotiated many years ago Mexico we
12:35
have a trade deficit with Mexico of over
12:37
a hundred billion dollars a year and I
12:40
told Mexico yesterday that because of
12:43
the fact that their laws are so strong
12:46
they can do things about it that hard to
12:49
believe the United States can't I said I
12:52
hope you're going to tell that caravan
12:53
not to get up to the border and I think
12:57
they're doing that because as of 12
12:58
minutes ago it was all being broken up
13:01
we'll see what happens but we have to
13:04
have strong borders we need the wall
13:06
we've started building the wall as you
13:07
know we have a billion six toward
13:09
building the wall and fixing existing
13:11
wall that's falling down or was never
13:13
appropriate in the first place and
13:15
that's very important as far as serious
13:17
concerned
13:19
our primary mission in terms of that was
13:23
getting rid of Isis we've almost
13:25
completed that task and we'll be making
13:28
a decision very quickly in coordination
13:30
with others in the area as to what we'll
13:33
do
13:33
Saudi Arabia is very interested in our
13:37
decision and I said well you know you
13:40
want us to say maybe you're gonna have
13:41
to pay but a lot of people you know we
13:44
do a lot of things in this country we do
13:45
them for we do them for a lot of reasons
13:50
but it's very costly for our country and
13:52
it helps other countries a hell of a lot
13:55
more than it helps us so we're going to
13:58
be making a decision we've had a
14:00
tremendous military success against Isis
14:03
as you know it's close to a hundred
14:04
percent as I just said and we'll be
14:07
making a decision as to what we do in
14:10
the very near future we'll be consulting
14:12
also with the groups of our people and
14:15
groups of our allies to pull the troops
14:18
out say you're you're inclined to pull
14:20
the troops out I want to get out I want
14:23
to bring our troops back home I want to
14:24
start rebuilding our nation we will have
14:27
as of three months ago seven trillion
14:30
dollars in the Middle East over the last
14:34
17 years we get nothing nothing out of
14:38
it nothing and as you remember in
14:42
civilian life for years I said keep the
14:44
oil I was always saying keep the oil we
14:46
didn't keep the oil who got the oil was
14:48
Isis got the oil a lot of it that's what
14:50
funded their campaigns they took a lot
14:53
of the oil and it was largely
14:55
responsible for fun and we should have
14:56
kept the oil then we didn't keep the oil
14:58
so I want to get back I want to rebuild
15:00
our nation think of it seven trillion
15:03
dollars over a 17 year period we have
15:06
nothing nothing except death and
15:08
destruction it's a horrible thing so
15:12
it's time it's time we were very
15:14
successful against Isis we'll be
15:16
successful against anybody militarily
15:19
but sometimes it's time to come back
15:22
home
15:23
and we're thinking about that very
15:25
seriously okay thank you
15:35
the three Lithuanian television mr.
15:39
president not not about getting out but
15:41
getting in the the joint declaration
15:44
mentions the periodic American
15:47
deployments in the Baltic countries what
15:50
specifically can you commit to having
15:52
heard the requests and wishes of the
15:55
Baltic States and president you have
15:58
mentioned Russia as a terrorist state
16:01
did you have a meeting of minds here as
16:04
to the thread that Russia poses to the
16:07
neighboring countries thank you well we
16:10
have a very strong relationship as the
16:12
presidents will tell you with the Baltic
16:15
States and we are with them we're
16:18
friends and we're allies and we are
16:21
going to have a long-term very fine
16:23
relationship in addition we do business
16:25
on trade we work very hard on security
16:27
together surprisingly large numbers of
16:32
trade these are very industrious nations
16:36
now you're from there so you know
16:38
exactly what I'm talking about these are
16:39
tremendous people and very very
16:42
industrious we do a lot of business
16:43
Andre thank you thank you very much the
16:46
second part of your question of course
16:48
interesting especially because we didn't
16:50
talk to in that words about the rival
16:55
especially on our board but then country
16:58
behaves aggressively performs wars
17:01
threatens with nuclear missiles on your
17:04
border of course you sometimes call this
17:07
country not very friend 'full that's why
17:10
we investing into our defense we
17:13
investing into our security we investing
17:16
into reforming NATO and we would like to
17:19
see strong NATO strong alliance and
17:22
that's what we are going to do together
17:36
mr. Trump speaking about economy about
17:40
Economic co-operation with my country is
17:44
Latvia but is the other message for
17:47
investors in Latvia and what is what is
17:51
your opinion about the investment in
17:54
what way I think all three would be
17:56
great places to invest stable
17:59
governments incredible people
18:01
hardworking industrious people I think
18:03
there would be great places to invest I
18:06
would have no problem with it although I
18:08
think as a president of the United
18:10
States they would call it a slight
18:12
conflict of interest perhaps you might
18:14
be hearing from these people no I think
18:16
it would be a great place I think all
18:18
three would be a great place to invest
18:19
okay thank you Thank You Murray and
18:26
roham estonian public broadcasting first
18:28
a question to President Trump as said
18:31
the concern of the Baltic states is
18:33
Russia and before the press conference
18:36
you also said that at the same time good
18:40
relationship with Russia is not bad but
18:42
how are you going to deal with President
18:45
Vladimir Putin is he as your enemy or
18:49
someone you can have dialogue with and
18:51
the second question is to our president
18:54
gets to call you light is the defense of
18:56
the Baltic States enough or should there
18:59
be something more for example air
19:01
defense systems thank you well I think
19:04
we'll be able to have great dialogue I
19:06
hope and if we can't you'll be the first
19:08
to know about it
19:09
nobody's been tougher on Russia than I
19:11
have and you can and I know you're
19:13
nodding yes because everyone agrees when
19:16
they think about it strong energy the
19:19
United States my opponent was into other
19:22
forms of energy like windmills where
19:26
we're very strong on energy were
19:29
essentially now energy independent we're
19:31
an exporter of energy that is not a
19:34
positive for Russia but it's certainly a
19:37
positive for the United States we just
19:39
passed a 700 billion dollar military
19:42
budget next year
19:43
716 billion dollars the largest-ever
19:46
past we are going to have a military
19:48
stronger than we've ever had before by
19:50
far and that's not exactly a great thing
19:54
for Russia but that's the way it is
19:58
we're gonna have the strongest military
19:59
that we ever had NATO NATO was
20:02
delinquent they were not paying their
20:04
bills they were not paying a lot of
20:06
states as we discussed they were not
20:09
they were not paying what they should be
20:11
paying since I came in many many
20:14
billions of dollars additional have been
20:16
paid by countries that weren't paying
20:18
and now they're paying and they will
20:21
have to pay more frankly if they're
20:22
gonna have to pay more so there are many
20:24
things that I've done and not only the
20:28
60 diplomats Germany did for France did
20:32
for we did 60 there's nobody been
20:36
tougher on Russia and with that being
20:39
said I think I could have a very good
20:41
relationship with President Putin I
20:43
think it's possible I won't and you will
20:46
know about it
20:47
believe me this room will know about it
20:49
before I know about it it's a real
20:52
possibility that I could have a good
20:54
relationship and remember this getting
20:56
along with Russia is a good thing
20:58
getting along with China is a good thing
21:01
getting along with other countries
21:03
including your three countries is a good
21:05
thing not a bad thing so I think I could
21:08
have a very good relationship with
21:10
Russia and with President Putin and if I
21:13
did that would be a great thing and
21:15
there's also a great possibility that
21:17
that won't happen who knows okay thank
21:21
you okay if I may marry on if I would
21:25
also like to contribute a little bit to
21:26
our first question
21:27
as I reminded you or we could trust the
21:29
judgment of the United States
21:31
administration's and people even while
21:33
we were occupied we could trust your
21:35
judgment when we regained independence
21:37
and seek membership of NATO for example
21:40
we could because we own a common
21:42
foundation you can walk around the mall
21:45
and read it's all written there this
21:47
foundation our compass for both and
21:49
therefore I trust the judgment of
21:51
President Trump and his administration
21:52
on that matter too now on your concrete
21:55
question on
21:56
only a defense yes we did discuss the
21:59
deterrence capacity necessary to make
22:02
sure that our deterrence is believable
22:04
to everybody who might want to cushion
22:07
it but you know equal partners don't
22:09
come to talk to each other this way that
22:11
I come here to Washington to ask for
22:13
these of freedom or I come here to ask
22:14
for let's say may you support me for
22:16
this or for that we analyze situation
22:18
together and we find the solutions
22:20
together which will work for us all
22:22
together because we are in it all
22:24
together we are contributors equal
22:26
contributors according to our size to
22:28
this process of guaranteeing our
22:30
security thank you summit we discuss
22:39
security issues in our region
22:42
with President Trump and I am sure that
22:46
this discussion will help a lot to
22:52
continue any political dialogue with our
22:56
Eastern neighbor Russia pick a reporter
23:03
please you could pick a reporter a
23:06
Baltic reporter ideally real news not
23:11
fake news god
23:17
you want to pick I think we have
23:19
anything do we have enough yes go ahead
23:22
pick mr. president
23:24
pick a reporter from the Baltics not the
23:27
same man he was very tough go ahead pick
23:29
a reporter yes go ahead
23:34
yes hi my name is Donald ray I'm from
23:39
Latvia so I have a question for our
23:42
president from Latvia you're going to
23:44
San Francisco after your meeting here in
23:47
Washington and you're meeting some
23:49
people who are making business
23:52
connections from Latvia and the US do
23:55
you see any any certain outcomes out of
23:58
that thank you first of all I think
24:01
during our summit I will repeat again
24:04
that we discussed how we can strengthen
24:07
our economic cooperation between Baltic
24:10
States and the US and of course my visit
24:15
to California to Silicon Valley will
24:20
give I think good basis for for better
24:25
understanding what our business people
24:29
need to be presented here and what I can
24:34
help how I can help them to be here
24:38
because anyway I think all these
24:41
cooperations between Baltic States
24:43
business people and US business people
24:46
is very important for our societies for
24:48
our business societies and as I said we
24:53
are thinking not only about investments
24:56
in our country and we are trying to make
25:01
better environment for investments in
25:05
our country but also our business people
25:08
are invested here and I think it is
25:13
important for both countries for Latvia
25:15
and for your for the US conclude by
25:20
saying that I'm very impressed with
25:22
these three great Baltic nations and
25:25
these three great presidents thank you
25:28
very much for being here thank you
25:29
everybody
25:30
thank you
25:49
you
A seguir:
7.5 O «escudo» USA sobre
a Europa
Tradutora: Maria Luísa de Vasconcellos
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.
Discurso do Presidente da Rússia, Vladimir Putin, na manhã do dia 24 de Fevereiro de 2022
Discurso do Presidente da Rússia, Vladimir Putin, Tradução em português
Presidente da Rússia, Vladimir Putin: Cidadãos da Rússia, Amigos,
Considero ser necessário falar hoje, de novo, sobre os trágicos acontecimentos em Donbass e sobre os aspectos mais importantes de garantir a segurança da Rússia.
Começarei com o que disse no meu discurso de 21 de Fevereiro de 2022. Falei sobre as nossas maiores responsabilidades e preocupações e sobre as ameaças fundamentais que os irresponsáveis políticos ocidentais criaram à Rússia de forma continuada, com rudeza e sem cerimónias, de ano para ano. Refiro-me à expansão da NATO para Leste, que está a aproximar cada vez mais as suas infraestruturas militares da fronteira russa.
É um facto que, durante os últimos 30 anos, temos tentado pacientemente chegar a um acordo com os principais países NATO, relativamente aos princípios de uma segurança igual e indivisível, na Europa. Em resposta às nossas propostas, enfrentámos invariavelmente, ou engano cínico e mentiras, ou tentativas de pressão e de chantagem, enquanto a aliança do Atlântico Norte continuou a expandir-se, apesar dos nossos protestos e preocupações. A sua máquina militar está em movimento e, como disse, aproxima-se da nossa fronteira.
Porque é que isto está a acontecer? De onde veio esta forma insolente de falar que atinge o máximo do seu excepcionalismo, infalibilidade e permissividade? Qual é a explicação para esta atitude de desprezo e desdém pelos nossos interesses e exigências absolutamente legítimas?
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.