GIULIETTO CHIESA

WWIII

 

CROATIAN  ENGLISH   ESPAÑOL  GREEK  NEDERLANDS  POLSKI  PORTUGUÊS EU   PORTUGUÊS BR  ROMANIAN  РУССКИЙ

What part will your country play in World War III?

By Larry Romanoff

 

The true origins of the two World Wars have been deleted from all our history books and replaced with mythology. Neither War was started (or desired) by Germany, but both at the instigation of a group of European Zionist Jews with the stated intent of the total destruction of Germany. The documentation is overwhelming and the evidence undeniable. (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11)

 

That history is being repeated today in a mass grooming of the Western world’s people (especially Americans) in preparation for World War IIIwhich I believe is now imminent. It is evident that War Clouds are gathering. The signs are everywhere, with media coverage and open talk of war in many countries. The RAND Corporation have for years been preparing military scenarios for World War III, and NATO is reported to be currently doing so. Vast movements of NATO troops and equipment are either in preparation or process to surround Russia. The US is surrounding China with military bases including the world's largest in Guam. Both China and Russia are surrounded with nearly 400 US biological weapons labs. Iran is entirely vulnerable from the American military build-up in the Middle East.

READ MORE

   

FREE JULIAN ASSANGE

Tuesday, May 14, 2019

US nuclear weapons capability



Overview
With the U.S. there is more (though insufficient) transparency over its nuclear weapons than any other countries’. In May 2010, the U.S. Department of Defense issued a fact sheet on its nuclear stockpile, which reported 5,113 warheads as of September 2009. Ever since, it has been updated almost annually. The last update, provided in January 2017, reported a total 4,018 warheads as of September 30, 2016(The White House 2017), indicating a reduction of 1,095 over a seven-year period.

A closer look at its nuclear capability shows 1,750 warheads in operational deployment (1,600 strategic warheads and 150 non-strategic). The strategic warheads are deployed with ICBMs, SLBMs and U.S. Air Force bases. The remainder (about 2,050) constitutes a reserve. This number is greater than the 1,393 strategic nuclear warheads in operational deployment registered under the New START as on September 1, 2017 (U.S. Department of State 2018-1). One reason for the discrepancy may be due to the New START Treaty of counting only one warhead per strategic bomber, as opposed to accounting for all other warheads stored on base where bombers are stationed. The White House’s January 2017 fact sheet also revealed that some 2,800 warheads were retired and awaiting disassembly. It is estimated that, with further reductions since September 2017 to have totaled 3,800, the entire U.S. nuclear stockpile to be 6,450 including 2,650 retired and awaiting disassembly.

On February 2, 2018, the Trump administration’s Nuclear Posture Review (NPR) fundamentally reversed the previous administration’s NPR, which had sought to reduce the role of nuclear weapons. The policy aims to lower the threshold for nuclear retaliation in the event of conventional attack and broaden the role of nuclear weapons. More specifically, it seeks to obtain a wide range of rapid response alternatives capable of breaching enemy defenses. To do so, it plans to lower yield on SLBM warheads and, over the long term, develop new weapons systems (such as SLCMs) that would facilitate preemptive strike.

Currently, the U.S. is in the process of modernizing its nuclear weapons. The NNSA 2016 plan is to cut back on surplus warheads dramatically by integrating seven existing types of warhead into a single type and also converting two ICBM warheads and three SLCM warheads into three mutually compatible warheads. In addition, it will begin replacing strategic nuclear submarines and bombers. For these initiatives, there will be an outlay of USD 400 billion between FY2017 and FY2026 (Congressional Budget Office 2017) and, over the next 30 years, USD 1.2 trillion (Arms Control Association 2018). It is critical to monitor how the U.S. nuclear posture will evolve under Trump’s NPR.
The U.S. conducted four ballistic test launches with the ICBM Minuteman III (Space Launch Report 2017) and four with the SLBM Trident II (Kristensen, Hans M. & Norris, Robert S. 2018-1)
.
Updated : June 1, 2018
Type / designation
Missile
/bomb
No. of warheads
per weapon
No. of warheads
Types of nuclear
warheads
Yield (kt)
Year first deployed
Remarks
Deployed
1,062
1,750
Intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM)
400
400
1)
200
1
200
W78
335
1979
 MinutemanIII  Mk-21/SERV
200
1
200
W87
300
2006
Submarine-launched ballistic missile (SLBM)
212
900
2)
122
36
516
W76-1
100
2008
 Trident II D5  Mk-5
90
36
384
W88
455
1990
Strategic bomber payloads
450
450
3)
200
1
200
W80-1
5–150
1961
100
1
100
B61-7
B61-11
B83-1
10–360
400
low–1,200
1985
1997
1993
150
1
150
B61-3
B61-4
0.3–170
0.3–50
1979
4)
Reserve / Nondeployed
2,050
5)
ICBM
400
SLBM
920
6)
Air-launched systems (Bombers, etc.)
730
730
 Strategic bomber Payload
580
1
580
7)
 Non-strategic nuclear weapons
150
1
150
B61-3/-4/-10
8)
Retired warheads awaiting dismantlement, etc.
2,650
9)
Total inventory
6,450
10)
Notes
1)
Estimates of operationally deployed numbers (Kristensen, Hans M. 2012) show 450 missiles and 500 nuclear warheads. New START data (U.S. Department of State 2018-1) as of September 1, 2017, indicates that 399 ICBMs are deployed. There have been reports that the conversion to single warhead has been completed (Global Security Newswire 2014), so the number is taken as 400 warheads. On the other hand, the United States has announced that the number of deployed ICBMs will be 400 on completion of New START implementation (U.S. Department of Defense 2014).
2)
Conventional estimates of operationally deployed numbers shows 288 missiles (12 submarines x 24 launch tubes) (Kristensen, Hans M. 2012-1). Toward the end of 2017, all vessels reduced their tubes from 24 to 20 (i.e., 240 missiles) (Kristensen, Hans M. & Norris, Robert S. 2018-1). According to the New START data disclosed on January 1, 2018, 212 SLBMs are in deployment, with no reference to the number of warheads (U.S. Department of State 2018-1). Here, we are subtracting 400 ICBMs and 300 bomber-equivalent warheads from a total 1,600 strategic warheads in operational deployment to arrive at 900 SLBM warheads. With these assumptions (212 SLBMs and 900 warheads), we have calculated the number of warheads by type. The latest estimate (Kristensen, Hans M. & Norris, Robert S. 2018-1) puts it at 384 W88 warheads, all of which are seen to be operationally deployed. Accordingly, we have subtracted these 384 W88s from the operationally deployed 900 warheads to arrive at 516 W76-1s. As for the Mk-4A and Mk-5A figures, the 212 SLBMs were broken down by warhead on a pro rata basis. The average is 4.5 warheads per missile, meaning four or five warheads in reality. The United States announced that it would have 240 SLBMs deployed on completion of New START implementation (U.S. Department of Defense 2014).
3)
An estimated 1,090-warhead reserve stockpile exists apart from 450 in operational deployment.
4)
150 weapons are deployed to six air force bases in five European countries (Belgium, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, and Turkey) for use by NATO forces (Kristensen, Hans M. & Norris, Robert S. 2015; Kristensen, Hans M. 2014). Meanwhile, the Tomahawk missile previously carried by nuclear-powered attack submarines have been retired and it was announced that the warheads have all been disassembled. (U.S. Department of State 2014-1)
5)
The ordnance of two Ohio-class nuclear submarines (48 missiles, 192 warheads) currently in overhaul, in addition to hundreds of bombs and cruise missiles are stored in central depositories. In January 2017, the White House revealed the total number of U.S. warheads both in deployment and reserve, as of September 30, 2016, to be 4,018 (The White House 2017). Based on this figure, we have applied a retirement rate and estimate the current stockpile to be 3,800 warheads. Subtracting 1,750 in operational deployment, we arrived at a reserve storage of 2,050 (Kristensen, Hans M. & Norris, Robert S. 2018-2). This breaks down, according to the latest estimates (Kristensen, Hans M. & Norris, Robert S. 2018-1), into 1,900 strategic and 150 non-strategic warheads. The strategic stockpile further breaks down into 400 ICBMs and 580 bombs on strategic bombers. We arrived at 920 SLBMs by subtracting any remainder from 1,900 warheads in reserve.
6)
These include hundreds of W76-1 warheads that have replaced W76-0s.
7)
They are stockpiled in central depositories at Kirtland Air Force Base in New Mexico and Nellis Air Force Base in Nevada (Kristensen, Hans M. & Norris, Robert S. 2016-1).
8)
They are probably being stored at Kirtland Air Base in New Mexico and Nellis Air Base in Nevada. There seems to be three categories: B61-3s, B61-4s, and the entire stock of B61-10s which is now in reserve.
9)
In addition, 20,000 plutonium pits used for primary detonation that have been removed from disassembled warheads together with 4,000 pits for secondary detonation are thought to be stockpiled at the Pantex plant (Texas) and Y-12 plant (Tennessee) (Kristensen, Hans M. & Norris, Robert S. 2018-2).
10)
On May 3, 2010, the U.S. government published a fact sheet on its nuclear weapons stockpile (U.S. Department of Defense 2010) stating that the stockpile of nuclear weapons consisted of 5,113 warheads as of September 30, 2009. It also clarified the year-to-year changes in that figure. This was based on recognition of how important these changes were in pursuing supplemental reductions after the New START Treaty went into effect. The same data was updated to 4,804 as of September 30, 2013 (April 29, 2014, U.S. Department of state 2014-2), 4,717 as of September 30, 2014 (April 27, 2015, John Kerry, Remarks at the 2015 NPT Revew Conference), and 4,571 as of September 30, 2015 (May 2016, U.S. Department of Defense 2016). The latest update is from January 2017. As of September 30, 2016, there existed 4,018 warheads (The White House 2017). In this table, those “retired warheads awaiting dismantlement” are subtracted from the entire stockpile and this equates 3,800 in storage. Given the pace of retirement following the January 2017 disclosure, it is an almost identical match.
Source
Arms Control Association 2018: “U.S. Nuclear Modernization Programs,” March, 2018. https://www.armscontrol.org/factsheets/USNuclearModernization (accessed May 31, 2018)
Congressional Budget Office 2017: “Approaches for Managing the Costs of U.S. Nuclear Forces, 2017 to 2046,” October, 2017. https://www.cbo.gov/system/files/115th-congress-2017-2018/reports/53211-nuclearforces.pdf
Global Security Newswire 2014: “U.S. Eliminates Multi-Warheads on All Ground-Based Nuclear Missiles,” http://www.nti.org/gsn/article/us-pulls-multiple-warheads-all-nuclear-missiles/ (accessed 1, 2014)
Kerry, John 2015 ‘Remarks at the 2015 NPT Review Conference, April 27,2015.’ http://www.state.gov/secretary/remarks/2015/04/241175.htm (accessed April 28, 2015)
Kristensen, Hans M. 2012: “Trimming Nuclear Excess -Options for Further Reductions of U.S. and Russian Nuclear Forces,” Federation of American Scientists, Special Report No. 5, December, 2012.
Kristensen, Hans M. 2013: “Capabilities of B61-12 Nuclear Bomb Increase Further,” October 30, 2013. http://blogs.fas.org/security/2013/10/b61-12hearing/ (accessed November 11, 2013)
Kristensen, Hans M. 2014: “B61-12: The New Guided Standoff Nuclear Bomb,” http://fas.org/programs/ssp/nukes/publications1/Brief2014_PREPCOM2.pdf (accessed May 7, 2014)
Kristensen, Hans M. 2015: “Status of World Nuclear Forces,” Federation of American Scientists, 2015. http://fas.org/issues/nuclear-weapons/status-world-nuclear-forces/ (accessed June 2, 2015)
Kristensen, Hans M. & Norris, Robert S. 2015: “US nuclear forces, 2015,” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, March/April, 2015.
Kristensen, Hans M. & Norris, Robert S. 2016-1: “US nuclear forces, 2016,” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, March/April, 2016.
Kristensen, Hans M. & Norris, Robert S. 2016-2: “Status of World Nuclear Forces,” Federation of American Scientists, May 26, 2016. http://fas.org/issues/nuclear-weapons/status-world-nuclear-forces/ (accessed May 29, 2016)
Kristensen, Hans M. & Norris, Robert S. 2017-1: “US nuclear forces, 2017,” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, Jan./Feb., 2017.
Kristensen, Hans M. & Norris, Robert S. 2017-2: “Status of World Nuclear Forces,” Federation of American Scientists, April 4, 2017.
http://fas.org/issues/nuclear-weapons/status-world-nuclear-forces/ (accessed May 31, 2017)
Kristensen, Hans M. & Norris, Robert S. 2018-1: “US nuclear forces, 2018,” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, Mar./Apr., 2018.
Kristensen, Hans M. & Norris, Robert S. 2018-2: “Status of World Nuclear Forces,” Federation of American Scientists, May 2018.
http://fas.org/issues/nuclear-weapons/status-world-nuclear-forces/ (accessed May 31, 2018)
NNSA 2016: “Fiscal Year 2016 Stockpile Stewardship and Management Plan,” https://nnsa.energy.gov/sites/default/files/FY16SSMP_FINAL%203_16_2015_reducedsize.pdf
Space Launch Report 2016: “2016 Major Suborbital Log,” http://www.spacelaunchreport.com/log2016.html#log2
Space Launch Report 2017: “2017 Major Suborbital Log,” http://www.spacelaunchreport.com/log2017.html#log2
U.S. Department of Defense 2010: “Fact Sheet Increasing Transparency in the U.S. Nuclear Weapons Stockpile,” https://www.defense.gov/Portals/1/features/defenseReviews/NPR/10-05-03_Fact_Sheet_US_Nuclear_Transparency__FINAL_w_Date.pdf
U.S. Department of Defense 2014: “Fact Sheet on U.S. Nuclear Force Structure under the New START Treaty,” April 8, 2014. http://www.defense.gov/documents/Fact-Sheet-on-US-Nuclear-Force-Structure-under-the-New-START-Treaty.pdf
U.S. Department of Defense 2016: “Stockpile Numbers: End of Fiscal Years 1962–2015,” http://open.defense.gov/Portals/23/Documents/frddwg/2015_Tables_UNCLASS.pdf
U.S. Department of State: “New START: Fact Sheets.” https://2009-2017.state.gov/t/avc/newstart/c39906.htm
U.S. Department of State 2014-1: “Report of the United States of America Pursuant to Actions 5, 20, 21 of the 2010 Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty Review Conference Final Document,” April 29, 2014. https://2009-2017.state.gov/documents/organization/225580.pdf
U.S. Department of state 2014-2: “Fact Sheet Transparency in the U.S. Nuclear Weapons Stockpile,” April 29, 2014. https://2009-2017.state.gov/t/avc/rls/225343.htm
U.S. Department of state 2015-1: “New START Treaty Aggregate Numbers of Strategic Offensive Arms, Fact Sheet,” Jan. 1, 2015. https://2009-2017.state.gov/t/avc/rls/235606.htm
U.S. Department of state 2015-2: “New START Treaty Aggregate Numbers of Strategic Offensive Arms, Fact Sheet,” July 1, 2015. https://2009-2017.state.gov/t/avc/rls/240062.htm
U.S. Department of state 2016-1: “New START Treaty Aggregate Numbers of Strategic Offensive Arms, Fact Sheet,” Jan. 1, 2016. https://2009-2017.state.gov/t/avc/rls/2016/250940.htm
U.S. Department of state 2016-2: “New START Treaty Aggregate Numbers of Strategic Offensive Arms, Fact Sheet,” April 1, 2016. https://2009-2017.state.gov/t/avc/rls/2016/255377.htm
U.S. Department of State 2017-1: “New START Treaty Aggregate Numbers of Strategic Offensive Arms, Fact Sheet,” Jan.1, 2017.
https://2009-2017.state.gov/t/avc/rls/2016/266384.htm
U.S. Department of State 2017-2: “New START Treaty Aggregate Numbers of Strategic Offensive Arms, Fact Sheet,” April.1, 2017.
https://www.state.gov/t/avc/newstart/269406.htm
U.S. Department of State 2018: “New START Treaty Aggregate Numbers of Strategic Offensive Arms, Fact Sheet,” January 12, 2018.
https://www.state.gov/t/avc/newstart/277439.htm
The White House 2017: Fact Sheet: The Prague Nuclear Agenda, Jan. 11, 2017.
https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/the-press-office/2017/01/11/fact-sheet-prague-nuclear-agenda
©RECNA Nuclear Warhead Data Monitoring Team

a)
ICBM LGM-30G
Designation
MinutemanIII
Propulsion
Three-stage solid-propellant
Launch platform
Silo
No. of warheads
Maximum 3 warheads
Warhead
W78, W87
Specifications
Length 18 m, Diameter 1.67 m, Weight 32.2 ton
Range
Over 9,600 km
Circular error probability
110 m
Where deployed
F.E. Warren Air Base (Wy)
Malmstrom Air Base (Mont)
Minot Air Base (N.D.)
Remarks
A modernization program to extend the service life of the Minuteman 3 until 2030 is in progress. The LGM-30G is deployed at three U.S.AF bases. Annually each base surveils the platform by launching a missile. The latest test launches were conducted on April 25 and May 14, 2018 from Vandenberg Air Base aimed at the test site at Kwajalein Atoll in the Marshall Islands. The “Mk-” designation is the identifying mark for the heat-resistant protective capsule for the nuclear warheads. Work on conversion of the Mk-12A/W78 warheads to single warheads has been proceeding since 2002, and the Obama administration completed that work in 2014. However, the possibility of reloading them has been left open. Mk-21/W87 warheads were carried by the Peacekeeper (retired in 2005), which was developed and deployed as the Minuteman 3 successor. All the obsolete Mk-12/W62 warheads for the Minuteman 3 were exchanged for these. Meanwhile, development is also underway on IW-1 interoperable warheads, which integrate the ICBM W78 warheads and the SLBM W88 warheads.
The U.S. plans to develop a new interoperable warhead, the IW-3, which will be based on the SLBM W76-1 and the IW-2, which is in turn interoperable between the W-87 (ICBM) and W88 (SLBM) warheads.
Source
Air Force Global Strike Command 2017-1: “Minot tests Minuteman III missile with launch from Vandenberg,” February 09, 2017. http://www.afgsc.af.mil/News/Article-Display/Article/1077316/minot-tests-minuteman-iii-missile-with-launch-from-vandenberg/ (accessed June 14, 2017)
Air Force Global Strike Command 2017-2: “F.E. Warren tests Minuteman III missile with launch from Vandenberg,” April 26, 2017. http://www.af.mil/News/Article-Display/Article/1163173/fe-warren-tests-minuteman-iii-missile-with-launch-from-vandenberg/ (accessed June 14, 2017)
Air Force Global Strike Command 2017-3: “MALMSTROM TESTS MINUTEMAN III MISSILE WITH LAUNCH FROM VANDENBERG,” May 03, 2017. http://www.afgsc.af.mil/News/Article-Display/Article/1170700/malmstrom-tests-minuteman-iii-missile-with-launch-from-vandenberg/ (accessed June 14, 2017)
FAS 2013: “LGM-30 Minuteman III ICBM – United States Nuclear Forces,” http://www.fas.org/nuke/guide/usa/icbm/lgm-30_3.htm (accessed July 10, 2013)
Global Security 2011: “LGM-30 Minuteman III ICBM – United States Nuclear Forces,” http://www.globalsecurity.org/wmd/systems/lgm-30_3-specs.htm (accessed July 10, 2013)
Global Security Newswire 2014: “U.S. Eliminates Multi-Warheads on All Ground-Based Nuclear Missiles,” http://www.nti.org/gsn/article/us-pulls-multiple-warheads-all-nuclear-missiles/ (accessed 1, 2014)
InDepthNews 2018: “US Launches Minuteman III Missile Test in Cloud of Secrecy,” Lompoc Record, April 25, 2018. https://www.indepthnews.net/index.php/the-world/usa-and-canada/1831-us-launches-minuteman-iii-missile-test-in-cloud-of-secrecy (accessed May 31, 2018)
Jacobson, Willis 2018: “Unarmed Minuteman III missile launched from Vandenberg Air Force Base as activists question timing,” Lompoc Record, May 14, 2018. https://lompocrecord.com/news/local/unarmed-minuteman-iii-missile-launched-from-vandenberg-air-force-base/article_52583bd9-9b57-5b62-9fdc-b15950c4e714.html (accessed May 31, 2018)
Kristensen, Hans M. & Norris, Robert S. 2017: “US nuclear forces, 2017,” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, Jan./Feb., 2017.
Kristensen, Hans M. & Norris, Robert S. 2018: “US nuclear forces, 2018,” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, Mar./Apr., 2018.
U.S. Department of Energy 2013: “Fiscal Year 2014 Stockpile Stewardship and Management Plan,” http://nnsa.energy.gov/ourmission/managingthestockpile/ssmp (accessed November 11, 2013)

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.

Manifestações

2007 Speech

UKRAINE ON FIRE

Discurso do Presidente da Rússia, Vladimir Putin, na manhã do dia 24 de Fevereiro de 2022

Discurso do Presidente da Rússia, Vladimir Putin, Tradução em português




Presidente da Rússia, Vladimir Putin: Cidadãos da Rússia, Amigos,

Considero ser necessário falar hoje, de novo, sobre os trágicos acontecimentos em Donbass e sobre os aspectos mais importantes de garantir a segurança da Rússia.

Começarei com o que disse no meu discurso de 21 de Fevereiro de 2022. Falei sobre as nossas maiores responsabilidades e preocupações e sobre as ameaças fundamentais que os irresponsáveis políticos ocidentais criaram à Rússia de forma continuada, com rudeza e sem cerimónias, de ano para ano. Refiro-me à expansão da NATO para Leste, que está a aproximar cada vez mais as suas infraestruturas militares da fronteira russa.

É um facto que, durante os últimos 30 anos, temos tentado pacientemente chegar a um acordo com os principais países NATO, relativamente aos princípios de uma segurança igual e indivisível, na Europa. Em resposta às nossas propostas, enfrentámos invariavelmente, ou engano cínico e mentiras, ou tentativas de pressão e de chantagem, enquanto a aliança do Atlântico Norte continuou a expandir-se, apesar dos nossos protestos e preocupações. A sua máquina militar está em movimento e, como disse, aproxima-se da nossa fronteira.

Porque é que isto está a acontecer? De onde veio esta forma insolente de falar que atinge o máximo do seu excepcionalismo, infalibilidade e permissividade? Qual é a explicação para esta atitude de desprezo e desdém pelos nossos interesses e exigências absolutamente legítimas?

Read more

ARRIVING IN CHINA

Ver a imagem de origem

APPEAL


APPEAL TO THE LEADERS OF THE NINE NUCLEAR WEAPONS' STATES

(China, France, India, Israel, North Korea, Pakistan, Russia, the United Kingdom and the United States)

中文 DEUTSCH ENGLISH FRANÇAIS ITALIAN PORTUGUESE RUSSIAN SPANISH ROMÂNA

manlio + maria

MOON OF SHANGHAI site

LR on CORONAVIRUS

LARRY ROMANOFF on CORONAVIRUS

Read more at Moon of Shanghai

World Intellectual Property Day (or Happy Birthday WIPO) - Spruson ...


Moon of Shanghai

L Romanoff

Larry Romanoff,

contributing author

to Cynthia McKinney's new COVID-19 anthology

'When China Sneezes'

When China Sneezes: From the Coronavirus Lockdown to the Global Politico-Economic Crisis

manlio

James Bacque

BYOBLU

irmãos de armas


Subtitled in PT, RO, SP

Click upon CC and choose your language.


manlio

VP




Before the Presidential Address to the Federal Assembly.



The President of Russia delivered
the Address to the Federal Assembly. The ceremony took
place at the Manezh Central Exhibition Hall.


January
15, 2020


vp

President of Russia Vladimir Putin:

Address to the Nation

Address to the Nation.

READ HERE


brics


Imagem

PT -- VLADIMIR PUTIN na Sessão plenária do Fórum Económico Oriental

Excertos da transcrição da sessão plenária do Fórum Económico Oriental

THE PUTIN INTERVIEWS


The Putin Interviews
by Oliver Stone (
FULL VIDEOS) EN/RU/SP/FR/IT/CH


http://tributetoapresident.blogspot.com/2018/07/the-putin-interviews-by-oliver-stone.html




TRIBUTE TO A PRESIDENT


NA PRMEIRA PESSOA

Um auto retrato surpreendentemente sincero do Presidente da Rússia, Vladimir Putin

CONTEÚDO

Prefácio

Personagens Principais em 'Na Primeira Pessoa'

Parte Um: O Filho

Parte Dois: O Estudante

Parte Três: O Estudante Universitário

Parte Quatro: O Jovem especialista

Parte Cinco: O Espia

Parte Seis: O Democrata

Parte Sete: O Burocrata

Parte Oito: O Homem de Família

Parte Nove: O Político

Apêndice: A Rússia na Viragem do Milénio


contaminação nos Açores



Subtitled in EN/PT

Click upon the small wheel at the right side of the video and choose your language.


convegno firenze 2019