The true origins of the two World Wars have been deleted from all our history books and replaced with mythology. Neither War was started (or desired) by Germany, but both at the instigation of a group of European Zionist Jews with the stated intent of the total destruction of Germany. The documentation is overwhelming and the evidence undeniable. (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11)
That history is being repeated today in a mass grooming of the Western world’s people (especially Americans) in preparation for World War III – which I believe is now imminent.
An opinion worth noting as
more peace activists face sentencing
By John LaForge
Federal
District Judge Miles Lord, who died December 10, 2016 at age 97,
could have given me 10 years once. Instead, the famously
outspoken judge, who was well known for protecting ordinary people from
corporate crime and pollution, used the anti-nuclear case a
group of us argued before him to deliver a remarkably scornful
condemnation of nuclear weapons and of the corruption
that protects them.
On August 10, 1984, Barb
Katt and I did more than $36,000 damage to launch-control computers being built
for Trident missile-firing submarines by Sperry Univac (now Unysis) in Eagan,
Minnesota. It was the 9th in a series of 100 so-called
Plowshares actions, one we’d planned for two years.
After walking
into the Sperry plant dressed in business suits, we used household
hammers to smash two of the company’s missile-guidance computers
then under construction.
We
“named” the wreckage by pouring blood over it because,
as the philosopher Simone Weil said, “Nuclear weapons kill without
being used by forcing people to starve.”
We didn’t run away but
waited for the authorities, explaining to workers
in the room that we’d disarmed
part of the government’s first-strike nuclear war machinery.
One worker said later as a
trial witness, “I’ve heard the word ‘Trident’ but I don’t know what
it means.”
A 1984 Star Tribune news clip about LaForge and Kate from the author’s
archives.
We were charged with felony
“depredation” and were convicted by a jury after a three-day trial. Facing a
maximum of 10 years in prison at a November 8 sentencing,
Barb and I urged Judge Lord to boldly denounce US nuclear war
preparations that were then common knowledge. Judge Lord then
did exactly that.
With the federal
government today proceeding with a 1-trillion-dollar nuclear weapons
modernization program, much like the one Ronald Reagan was overseeing
in 1984, Judge Lord’s stunning critique of criminal
corporate militarism is as relevant as ever. These
are the judge’s sentencing remarks
from the bench, as reported in the official transcript:
“It
is the allegation of these young people that they
committed the acts here complained of as a desperate plea
to the American people and its government to
stop the military madness which they sincerely believe will destroy
us all, friend and enemy alike.
“They have made a plausible
argument that international law prohibits what our country is doing by
way of manufacturing weapons of mass destruction.
“As I ponder
over the punishment to be meted out to these two people who were
attempting to unbuild weapons of mass destruction, we must ask
ourselves: Can it be that those of us who build weapons to kill are
engaged in a more sanctified endeavor than those who would by their acts
attempt to counsel moderation and mediation as an alternative
method of settling international disputes?
“Why are we so fascinated by
a power so great that we cannot comprehend its magnitude? What is so sacred about
a bomb, so romantic about a missile? Why do we condemn and hang individual
killers while extolling the virtues of warmongers? What is
that fatal fascination which attracts us
to the thought of mass destruction of our
brethren in another country? Why can we even entertain the thought
that all people on one side of an imaginary line must die and, if we
be so ungodly cynical as to countenance that thought, have we given thought
to the fact that in executing that decree we will also die? Who draws
these lines and who has so decreed?
“How
many of the people in this democracy have seriously
contemplated the futility of committing national suicide in
order to punish our adversaries? Have we so little faith in our
system of free enterprise, our capitalism and the fundamental
concepts that are taught us in our constitutions and in our several bibles that
we must, in order to protect ourselves
from the spread of foreign ideologies, be prepared to die
at our own hands? Such thinking indicates a great deal of lack of faith
in our democracy, our body politic, our people and our institutions.
“There are those in high
places that believe Armageddon is soon to be upon us, that Christ will soon
come to earth and take us all back with him to heaven. It would appear that much of our
national effort is being devoted to helping with the process. It may
even be a celebration of sorts. When the bombs go off,
Christ won’t have to come to earth. We will all, believers and nonbelievers alike,
meet him halfway.
(“I believe that the poor are blessed and that we have a duty to help
them,” said Judge Miles Lord in a short 2017 video about him, shown below.)
“The anomaly of this
situation is that I am here called upon to punish two individuals who were
charged with having caused damage to the property of a
corporation in the amount of $36,000. It is this self-same
corporation which only a few months ago was before me
accused of having wrongfully embezzled from the U.S. government the sum of $3.6
million.
“The employees of this
company succeeded in boosting the corporate profits by wrongfully and
feloniously juggling the books. Since these individuals were all
employees of a corporation, it appears that it did not occur to
anyone in the office of the Attorney
General of the United States
that the actions of these men constituted a criminal
conspiracy for which they might be punished. The government demanded
only that Sperry pay back a mere 10 percent of the amount by
which the corporation had been unlawfully enriched.
“Could it be that these
corporate men who were working to build weapons of mass destruction
received special treatment
because of the nature of their work?
“I am also called upon to
determine the amount of restitution that is to be required
by the two individuals who have done damage
to the property of Sperry. The financial
information obtained by the probation office indicated that
neither of the defendants owes any money to anyone. While Ms.
Katt has no assets, Mr. LaForge is comparatively well endowed. He owns a 1968
Volkswagen, a guitar, a sleeping bag, and $200 in cash.
“The inexorable
pressure which generates from those who are engaged in making a living and a
profit from building military equipment, and the pork barreling that
goes on in the halls of Congress to obtain more such
contracts for the individual state, will in the ultimate
consume itself in an atomic holocaust. These same factors exert a powerful
pressure upon a federal judge in my position to go along
with the theory that there is something sacred about a bomb and
that those who raise their voices or their hands against it should be struck
down as enemies of the people, no matter that in their hearts
they feel and know that they are friends of the people.
Judge Miles Lord was a champion of the underdog and the oppressed.
(YouTube)
“Now
conduct of this sort cannot be condoned
under the guise of free speech. Neither should it be
totally condemned as being subversive, traitorous, or treasonous
in the category of espionage or some other bad things. I
would here in this instance take the sting
out of the Bomb, attempt in some way to
force the government to remove the halo with which it seems
to embrace any device which can kill and to place thereon a shroud, the shroud of death,
destruction, mutilation, disease and debilitation.
“If there be an adverse
reaction to this sentence, I will anxiously
await the protestations of those who
complain of my attempts to correct the imbalance that now
exists in a system that operates in such a manner as to provide one
type of justice for the rich and a lesser type
for the poor,one standard for the mighty and another
for the meek, and a system which finds its humanness and objectivity
is sublimated to military madness and the worship of the Bomb.
“A judge sitting
here as I do is not called upon to do that which is politically expedient or
popular but is called upon to exercise calm and deliberate judgment in a manner
best suited to accomplish, and accommodate, and
vindicate the rights of the people acting through its
government and the rights of those people who
are the subject matter of such actions. The most
popular thing to do at this particular time would be to sentence [Katt and
LaForge] to a 10-year period of imprisonment, and some judges might
be disposed to do just that.
[Thereupon, the sentences
were imposed: six months imprisonment, suspended, with six months unsupervised
probation.]
“I am also
aware of the thrust of the argument, which would
say this would encourage others to do likewise. If others do likewise, they
must be dealt with at that time. I am also impressed
with the argument that this might in some way constitute a
disparity of sentence, that [Katt and LaForge] have not been properly
punished because some others might not be deterred from doing [what they did]. I
really wonder
about the constitutionality of sentencing one person
for a crime that may be committed by another person at another time and place.
“It is also difficult for me
to equate the sentence I here give you — for destroying $36,000
worth of property, because you have been charged — with those who
stole $3.6 million worth of property and were not charged, demoted,
or in any way punished. My conscience is clear. We will
adjourn the Court.”
Discurso do Presidente da Rússia, Vladimir Putin, na manhã do dia 24 de Fevereiro de 2022
Discurso do Presidente da Rússia, Vladimir Putin, Tradução em português
Presidente da Rússia, Vladimir Putin: Cidadãos da Rússia, Amigos,
Considero ser necessário falar hoje, de novo, sobre os trágicos acontecimentos em Donbass e sobre os aspectos mais importantes de garantir a segurança da Rússia.
Começarei com o que disse no meu discurso de 21 de Fevereiro de 2022. Falei sobre as nossas maiores responsabilidades e preocupações e sobre as ameaças fundamentais que os irresponsáveis políticos ocidentais criaram à Rússia de forma continuada, com rudeza e sem cerimónias, de ano para ano. Refiro-me à expansão da NATO para Leste, que está a aproximar cada vez mais as suas infraestruturas militares da fronteira russa.
É um facto que, durante os últimos 30 anos, temos tentado pacientemente chegar a um acordo com os principais países NATO, relativamente aos princípios de uma segurança igual e indivisível, na Europa. Em resposta às nossas propostas, enfrentámos invariavelmente, ou engano cínico e mentiras, ou tentativas de pressão e de chantagem, enquanto a aliança do Atlântico Norte continuou a expandir-se, apesar dos nossos protestos e preocupações. A sua máquina militar está em movimento e, como disse, aproxima-se da nossa fronteira.
Porque é que isto está a acontecer? De onde veio esta forma insolente de falar que atinge o máximo do seu excepcionalismo, infalibilidade e permissividade? Qual é a explicação para esta atitude de desprezo e desdém pelos nossos interesses e exigências absolutamente legítimas?
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.