The true origins of the two World Wars have been deleted from all our history books and replaced with mythology. Neither War was started (or desired) by Germany, but both at the instigation of a group of European Zionist Jews with the stated intent of the total destruction of Germany. The documentation is overwhelming and the evidence undeniable. (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11)
That history is being repeated today in a mass grooming of the Western world’s people (especially Americans) in preparation for World War III – which I believe is now imminent.
« The flying man bewitches Paris at the 14 July parade » -
headlines like that were used to describe France's military parade along the
Champs Élysées. As usual, we were given the impression that we were being
informed about everything in the minutest detail.
But « big news » is hiding from us everything that we
really need to know. For example, that two days before the parade, President
Emmanuel Macron was in the port of Cherbourg to participate in the launching of
a nuclear attack submarine, the Suffren, the first vessel in the new
Baracuda series, built on a ten-year programme at a cost of 9 billion Euros.
The submarine, armed with long-range cruise missiles with both conventional and
nuclear capacities, and equipped with a mini-sub for special forces operations,
was described by Admiral Christophe Prazuck as a « hunter born to fight
our enemies ».
Among the 700 international guests at the launch ceremony was the
Australian Minister for Defence, Linda Reynolds, who had signed a contract to
buy 12 French attack submarines. At the moment, in Australia, there are
on-going discussions concerning the possibility for the country to leave the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons (TPNW) and
build its own nuclear arsenal. Australia, a partner of NATO, is opposed to the
Treaty, which was approved in July 2017 by the General Assembly of the United
Nations with 122 voices for. So far, it has been signed by 70 countries, but
ratified only by 23 (including Austria, Cuba, Mexico, New Zealand, South Africa
and Venezuela), less than half of the 50 signatures necessary for its
implementation.
Sweden, which had approved it in 2017, has announced that it will not
sign the Treaty either – a decision behind which can be felt the influence of
NATO, the sworn enemy of the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons (TPNW).
While nuclear disarmament remains on paper, the possibility of
proliferation escalates, as does the risk that the arms race will be run
increasingly on the qualitative level. This was confirmed by the announcement
made, on the eve of the 14 July parade, by President Macron himself – in
September, France will create a new National Command for its Military Space
Force, with a primary financing of 3,6 billion Euros over 6 years.
« The new space and military doctrine which was proposed to me
by the Minister, and which I approved, will enable us to ensure our defence of
space and by space » [1], declared President Macron. So the
militarisation of space is being intensified, an area of growing strategic
importance, given that the main arms systems, beginning with nuclear weapons,
depend on spatial systems.
With its new Space Command, France is taking up position in the wake
of the United States. In February, President Trump signed a directive
inaugurating the US Space Force, a force specifically designed for military
operations in space, directed above all against Russia and China. The Senate
Armed Services Committee, by handing the command of the new Force to the
Aeronautics sector,defined space as a
« field for the conduct of warfare ». The meetings announced by the
United Nations in March, an attempt to prevent a spatial arms race, failed due
to US opposition. The USA refused to join negotiations to discuss the first
draft of a Treaty, presented by China and Russia, which would forbid the
placing of weapons in space, and stipulates a series oflegal limits for using space for military
purposes.
While media attention was focused on the « flying man » who
sky-danced over the Champs-Élysées, we forgot the fact that in a short time
there will be nuclear weapons flying above our heads, in orbit around the
Earth.
[1]
The exact quote is - « The new military doctrine for space, which was
proposed to me by the Minister, and which I approved, will enable us to ensure
our defence of space and by space. We will reinforce our understanding of the
spatial situation, we will protect our satellites more efficiently, including
in an active way. And to make this corps a reality, to ensure the development
and reinforcement of our spatial capacities, a grand Space Command will be
created in September within the structure of the Air Force. This will become,
in time, the Air and Space Force. New and indispensable investments will be
decided ».
Discurso do Presidente da Rússia, Vladimir Putin, na manhã do dia 24 de Fevereiro de 2022
Discurso do Presidente da Rússia, Vladimir Putin, Tradução em português
Presidente da Rússia, Vladimir Putin: Cidadãos da Rússia, Amigos,
Considero ser necessário falar hoje, de novo, sobre os trágicos acontecimentos em Donbass e sobre os aspectos mais importantes de garantir a segurança da Rússia.
Começarei com o que disse no meu discurso de 21 de Fevereiro de 2022. Falei sobre as nossas maiores responsabilidades e preocupações e sobre as ameaças fundamentais que os irresponsáveis políticos ocidentais criaram à Rússia de forma continuada, com rudeza e sem cerimónias, de ano para ano. Refiro-me à expansão da NATO para Leste, que está a aproximar cada vez mais as suas infraestruturas militares da fronteira russa.
É um facto que, durante os últimos 30 anos, temos tentado pacientemente chegar a um acordo com os principais países NATO, relativamente aos princípios de uma segurança igual e indivisível, na Europa. Em resposta às nossas propostas, enfrentámos invariavelmente, ou engano cínico e mentiras, ou tentativas de pressão e de chantagem, enquanto a aliança do Atlântico Norte continuou a expandir-se, apesar dos nossos protestos e preocupações. A sua máquina militar está em movimento e, como disse, aproxima-se da nossa fronteira.
Porque é que isto está a acontecer? De onde veio esta forma insolente de falar que atinge o máximo do seu excepcionalismo, infalibilidade e permissividade? Qual é a explicação para esta atitude de desprezo e desdém pelos nossos interesses e exigências absolutamente legítimas?
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.