How NATO-Member Turkey Reverted Back
to Being an Islamic Dictatorship
The gradual process of Turkey’s
becoming an Islamic sharia-law
country, again, is no
longer so gradual. It has taken a sudden and sharp rightward turn, into
Islamic-nationhood. Turkey’s Hagia Sophia, which had been “the world's largest cathedral for nearly a
thousand years, until Seville Cathedral was completed in 1520,” has
now been officially declared by the Turkish Government to be, instead, a
mosque.
On July 10th, the BBC bannered “Hagia Sophia: Turkey turns iconic
Istanbul museum into mosque” and reported that the biggest, oldest, and the most important, cathedral in all of
Orthodox Christendom — and the world’s most important Byzantine building, which
was constructed as the Saint
Sophia Cathedral by the Byzantine Roman Emperor Justinian I in Constantinople
(now Istanbul) in the year 537, and which stands on the site that had been
consecrated in the year 325 by the Roman Emperor Constantine (and which cathedral was relabelled the Hagia
Sophia “museum” in 1935 by Turkey’s Constitutionally secularist Government) —
has now become, officially, at last, designated, by the restored Islamic
Government of Turkey, a Muslim house of worship, a mosque, a Muslim house
of worship.
This signals the end of Turkey’s
being ruled by a secular Government, which it had been, ever since 1923. It is
the end of Turkey’s secular Government and the restoration of the Islamic Mehmed the Conqueror’s 1453 order
that it be a mosque. That
ended the Byzantine Roman Catholic Empire, and started Islamic-ruled Turkey. It
ended Constantinople and started Istanbul. Mehmet, however, allowed Christianity to continue,
in the Islamic Ottoman Empire, but only as an accepted part of the Greek East
(“Orthodox”), not as part of the Roman West (imperialistic), Christianity (which he had just then conquered with
the fall of Constantinople on that same date, 29 May 1453). And now, even the
Orthodox Christians are being marginalized in Turkey, because the Hagia Sophia
had been “for almost
1,000 years the most important Orthodox cathedral.”
This is an act with huge
international implications. It is an important event in human history.
Turkey’s dictator, Recip Tayyip
Erdogan, whose entire actual education was
only in Islamic schools though he lies about it and claims to have received a
degree from a non-Islamic university, is in the process of transforming Turkey back again
into a specifically Islamic type of dictatorship, a Sharia-law-ruled state. The
secularist Turkish Republic that was instituted in 1923 by the
Enlightenment-inspired Kemal Attaturk has now decisively ended. The widespread
speculations that Erdogan has been aiming to restore Turkey to being the
imperial nation and ruler of a restored Islamic Ottoman Empire are now
decisively confirmed by this brazen act of insult to Orthodox Christians, and
even to Roman Christians, because — as Wikipedia notes — “Justinian has sometimes been known as the
‘Last Roman’ in mid-20th century historiography.” The Orthodox Church in
America titles him as “Saint
Justinian The Emperor”.
However, Wikipedia also notes that Constantine XI Palaiologos, who was killed
by Mehmet’s forces on that date, 29 May 1453, was actually the last Roman
Emperor. That ended the Roman Empire.
In other words: the Turkish
Government’s official change of Saint Sophia Cathedral, which Justinian had
created in 537, into now and henceforth a mosque, is a taking ownership of, and
a Turkish-Muslim declaration of supremacy over, a different religion’s main
house of worship. It’s a historical dagger into the heart of Orthodox
Christianity, as well as being an insult to Roman Christianity.
This is not merely an isolated act,
either; it is, instead, something to which Erdogan has long been building.
Erdogan’s grab of land from secularist-ruled
(committedly anti-sectarian) Syria, and his recent sending of troops to help conquer the
formerly secularist Libya, which land had been turned into a hellish civil war
by a U.S.-and-allied invasion in 2011 and which chaos there continues to this
day, all are consistent with an understanding of Erdogan in which his foremost
objective is a restoration of the Ottoman Empire. And the U.S. Government has
supported this objective of his (but only as Turkey being a branch of the U.S.
empire), and tried to get the EU to accept it.
The question now — since the United
States Government has been pushing against European resistance to accepting a
military alliance with an Islamic dictatorship — is whether continuation of the
NATO alliance will be ended because of the path that Erdogan and the United States
Government have jointly been taking to re-impose a decidedly Sunni Islamic
dictatorship upon Turkey (by means of which, Turkey will serve as a wedge
against both Shiite controlled Iran, and an increasingly Orthodox-dominated
Russia). However, there has been a split between Erdogan and the U.S. regime,
because he does not intend his restored Ottoman empire to be a
part of the U.S. or any other empire. Erdogan’s independent streak is what now
threatens to break-up the Western Alliance — the U.S. empire (which is actually the Rhodesist UK-U.S. empire).
The United States Government has been
preferring Erdogan’s former political partner but now enemy, Erdogan’s fellow
Sunni Islamist Fethullah Gulen, who cooperates with the U.S. and is a CIA protégé (including rabidly against
Shiite Iran and
against Iran’s main ally Russia). Gulen is passionately
endorsed by America’s aristocracy. The U.S. regime has been preferring Gulen to impose this transformation of Turkey
into an Islamic U.S. satellite, because Gulen models his operation (and he has even described it in remarkable
detail) upon U.S. and UK
‘intelligence’ practices (CIA & MI6), whereas Erdogan has insisted upon an
independent Turkey with its own nationalistic ‘intelligence’ organization — a
nationalistically transformed version of Turkey’s existing MIT or
National Intelligence Organization — an ‘intelligence’ organization that’s cleansed
of what the CIA
praises as “Gulen
is interested in slow and deep social change, including secular higher
education; Erdogan as a party leader is first and foremost interested in
preserving his party’s power, operating in a populist manner, trying to raise
the general welfare.” (The CIA actually knows that this has nothing
whatsoever to do with “trying to raise the general welfare” — the U.S. regime’s
goal is to extend everywhere the U.S. empire, and Erdogan’s Turkish regime has
that same goal for the Turkish empire, which doesn’t yet even exist, though it
once did as the Ottoman Empire, and he wants to restore it.) Erdogan insists
upon Turkey’s not being merely a vassal-state or colony within a foreign-led
empire, but instead the leading nation of its own empire,
starting perhaps with gobbling up Syria and Libya, but extending ultimately more globally. There is a
soundly documented article titled “Why Are
Gulenists Hostile Toward Iran?” and it provides much of the reason why the CIA
supports Gulen (they do largely because Erdogan isn’t so
obsessive against Iran — which country America’s aristocracy crave to conquer
again, as they had done in 1953, and Erdogan doesn’t support that as
passionately as they require).
The question now for Europe is
whether it wants to be again a participant in various aristocracies’, and
clergies’, imperialistic designs, or instead to declare itself finally
non-aligned and to lead thereby a new global non-aligned movement, not
militaristically, but instead by providing, to the entire world, an anti-imperialistic
and truly democratic model, a re-start and replacement of
today’s United Nations, and one that will reflect what had been Franklin Delano Roosevelt’s anti-imperialist
intention, and not Harry
S. Truman’s American-imperialist intention — a start from scratch that has
FDR’s statements to guide it, and not Truman’s actions to guide it (such as has
been the case). Perhaps even the U.S., NYC-based, U.N. would ultimately sign
onto that new international global federation; but the only basis upon which
nations in the old U.N. should be accepted into its successor would be if the
old U.N. were gradually to dissolve itself as its individual nations would,
each on its own, sign onto the new one. Ultimately, this option must be made
available to all Governments, to choose to either continue in Truman’s U.N., or
else join instead a new, and authentically FDR-based,
authentically anti-imperialistic, replacement of it.
That is what this dictatorial Islamization
of Turkey is really all about, and only Europe can make the decision — no other
land can. However, such a decision will only fail if any such organization as a
new U.N. is to be at all involved in the particular national issues that now
are so clearly coming to the fore in the transformation of Turkey into a Sunni
Islamist dictatorship.
The “international community” should
have no say in Turkey’s intranational (or “domestic”) affairs —
regardless of whether Turkey is in or out of Europe. Sectarian and
nationalistic concerns cannot rule in the formation of any authentically
democratic new international order — an authentically non-imperialistic
international order. All such concerns, domestic concerns, must be strictly the
domain of the authority and power of each one of the individual constituent
units, each individual national Government itself controlling its own internal
affairs. FDR was adamant about that. He was insistent that the U.N. not get
involved in individual nations’ internal affairs. The profoundly
anti-FDR, “Responsibility to Protect” idea (which now has even acquired the status of being
represented by an acronym “R2P” catch-phrase), has increasingly arisen recently
to become a guiding principle of international relations, and must be soundly
and uncompromisingly rejected in the formulation and formation of any
replacement-organization — any authentically democratic
international federation of nations. Otherwise, everything would be futile, and
there will be a WW III. We are heading in exactly the opposite direction from
that which FDR had intended — which was to prevent any Third
World War.
This decision will be made by the
individual nations of Europe. Only they collectively hold this power. They will
be able to exercise it only if they will terminate their alliances outside of
Europe, and proceed forward no longer bound by external alliances, but instead
become a free and independent European federation of European states. Only
they, collectively, will be able to make this decision, as Europeans,
for the entire world, regarding what the world’s future will be. And only they
will hold the ultimate responsibility — and it’s NOT the “responsibility to protect”. It is instead the responsibility to protect the
future of the entire world. It’s the responsibility to protect a
future for the world. And if Europe fails it, then the world will
inevitably move forward to WW III, as it is doing. A new international order is
needed, and only Europe can lead it, if Europe will.
In order for Europe to do that,
Europe must first define itself. Is Turkey part of Europe? Is Russia?
What is Europe? If Europeans won’t be able to agree on that,
then the world will continue to move forward towards WW III, because the world
will then have no center, it will continue to have only contending empires —
exactly what FDR had aimed to prevent.
Europe is the key. But will Europe’s
leaders place the key in the lock, and open, finally, the door to a non-imperialistic
world? The present, U.S.-empire-aligned, Europe, won’t do that. Turkey’s action
on the Hagia Sophia, which is an insult to all Christians, and especially to
Orthodox ones, might finally force the issue — and its solution.
Other than that, however, the
official designation of the Hagia Sophia as being a mosque is entirely a
domestic, Turkish, matter.
—————
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.