FOR YOUR INFORMATION -- Not CO2! – Secret military weapons and toxin-spraying operations threaten the world climate!

Not CO2! – Secret military weapons and toxin-spraying operations threaten the world climate!

14.11.2025 | www.kla.tv/39427

January 2025: Forest fires rage in Southern California.

And the result of this study is that climate change has increased the risk of devastating forest fires. The hot, dry and windy conditions that have led to the massive size of the fires are 35 percent attributable to man-made climate change.

 

January 23, 2025: Storm Eowyn rages over Ireland.

There are plausible links between extreme storms like today and climate change and we will see more severe storms due to warming.

 

May 28, 2025: The Swiss mountain village of Blatten is largely destroyed by an avalanche of debris and ice.

Professor Michael Krautblatter heads the Chair of Landslide Research at the Technical University of Munich. He suspects that the event in Valais is linked to climate change.

 

Gigantic floods in Texas in the beginning of July 2025.

Was climate change to blame? Climate change is making tropical storms more dangerous not only in this way. It is to be expected that more extreme, potentially deadly storms will become more frequent as a result of climate change.

July 27, 2025: Greece and Turkey battle record heat and forest fires.

Climate change as a fire accelerator.

Scientists see climate change as the decisive factor behind the increasingly extreme conditions. These were just a few examples of how the system media reported on natural disasters this year. Did you recognize the common thread? The scapegoat for these disasters is always climate change allegedly caused by CO₂. The ZDF broadcasting corporation defines the cause of this climate change on its website as follows. Climate change is progressing. It will be mitigated if we emit less CO₂ and other greenhouse gases. However, this absolute statement by the ZDF and other media that climate change is only caused by greenhouse gases is shaken to its foundations if, in addition to the so-called mainstream, free, alternative information platforms are also allowed to have their say as dissenting voices. Here are two examples. First.

The kla.tv documentary “Climate Consensus Under the Microscope” refutes the claim that 97% of scientists agree that climate change is caused by CO₂. This is scientific fraud with cheap sleight of hand tricks. Secondly. The kla.tv documentary “Updates for Greta” uses facts and figures to prove that completely different causes are responsible for climate change. In numerous other documentaries, kla.tv has broadcast rebuttals to the CO₂ thesis.

 

Well-founded expert presentations, which are withheld from viewers of ARD, ZDF etc., also show other possible causes of climate change. The following three facts should make any objective observer suspicious of this controversial CO₂ theory.

 

Fact 1:Composition of air The volume percentage of CO2 in the air is 0.04%

Fact 2: The proportion of CO2 in the air that humans can actually influence is around 4% This means that humans can only influence 4% of the 0.04% CO2 content of the air, which is approx. 0.0016% of the total amount of air! This is approx. 0.0016% of the total air volume.

Fact 3: Germany's share of global CO₂ emissions is a maximum of 2%.

 

This means that Germany's citizens only influence approx. 0.000032% of the total amount of air via CO₂. Can the sixth digit after the decimal point really save the climate? Who can still fully understand the CO₂ climate issue based on these figures? Especially as billions are pumped into carbon offsetting projects every year?

 

However, as the above examples from the year 2025 show, ARD, ZDF and Co. continue to sell the CO₂ theory as fact to their millions of viewers despite all the evidence to the contrary. What is important in this context is that there are publicly accessible documents that prove that the military in particular can actually influence the climate on a large scale with weather weapon systems. Evidence for the existence of climate-altering weapon systems

 

1. 1. The European Parliament

 

The European Parliament confirms in a report dated January 14, 1999 entitled HAARP – A climate-damaging weapon system. The existence of dangerous weather weapons. Here are brief excerpts from this highly explosive report. HAARP can be used for many purposes. By manipulating the electrical properties in the atmosphere, enormous forces can be controlled. If this is used as a military weapon, the consequences can be disastrous for the enemy. HAARP can charge a clearly defined area with millions of times more energy than any other conventional energy. HAARP can cause changes in climatic conditions. The system can also affect the entire ecosystem. Another serious consequence of HAARP is the holes in the ionosphere caused by the strong waves directed upwards.

 

1. 2. The UN-NMOD Convention

 

Known as the United Nations Convention on Environmental Warfare. Here is an excerpt from the UN NMOD Convention from 1976, which illustrates the possibilities that can be caused by the use of environmental manipulation techniques. Earthquakes, tidal waves, disruption of the ecological balance of a region, changes in weather structures, clouds, precipitation, hurricanes of various kinds and tornadoes, changes in climate structures, changes in ocean currents, changes in the state of the ozone layer, and changes in the state of the ionosphere.

 

1. 3. Former US Secretary of Defense Dr. William Cohen

 

Cohen confirmed the existence of these climate-altering weapons on April 28, 1997 at a conference on terrorism in Athens. Others even engage in a kind of eco-terrorism, changing the climate, creating earthquakes and, opening volcanoes through the use of electromagnetic waves. It is real, and that is why we need to intensify our counter-terrorism efforts.

 

4. Numerous patents confirm the existence of climate weapons

 

There are hundreds of US weather patents for weather manipulation technologies. Numerous patents, for example US patent 4.412.654, confirm that highly toxic substances, such as aluminum, barium or lead, can be sprayed as fine dust by aircraft and thus have a massive impact on the weather. Should all of these very expensive US patents really only have been applied for but never be used? Hardly, because 110 weather manipulation programs were approved by the US Senate between 1947 and 1978. A US Air Force document from 1996 clearly states the goal. We will own the weather by 2025. These documents prove beyond doubt that secret military weapons have been in existence for decades that can trigger storms, severe weather, but also extreme drought and demonstrably change our climate.

 

Specifically, the HAARP antenna systems already mentioned are one of the issues here. Such facilities have been in place for decades in a number of countries, as the world map shows. The USA in particular has also demonstrably manipulated the climate and weather with one of its largest plants in Alaska, which has required vast amounts of energy to operate since the 1990s. In order to use these weapons even more effectively, some of them also require the spraying of highly toxic substances by aircraft. The fact that this actually happens and is by no means a conspiracy theory is confirmed by none other than former FBI chief Ted Gunderson shortly before his death. The American educational pioneer, Dr. Anthony Hilder, reported with reference to medical evidence that Gunderson did not die of natural causes, but was poisoned. The documents cited by Gunderson and his personal statement shed a new light on the omnipresent climate debate of recent years. And certainly, not every natural disaster has been triggered by weather weapons. However, the following two questions need to be asked urgently with regard to mass media reporting.

 

1. Why is a CO₂ theory constantly being sold to the population as proven science?

2. Why, on the other hand, are secret military climate weapons, which demonstrably damage our climate, completely ignored or even denied in the climate debate?

 

The following scenario provides a conclusive explanation for these two extremely explosive questions: High-ranking military officers have always had a great interest in the weather, because the power over the weather can be decisive for war. It was not without reason that former US President Lindon B. Johnson said: "He who controls the weather will control the world". However, the military was aware from the outset that the use of these secret military weather weapons and the associated spraying of highly toxic metal oxide particles into the atmosphere would inevitably change the climate in the long term. To avoid being exposed as the cause of serious climate change themselves, they have launched the CO₂ thesis by supporting media campaigns. Suddenly there were warnings of a climate horror scenario in which entire cities would sink into the sea and only Cologne Cathedral, for example, would rise out of the sea. At the same time, scientists were presenting the population with the CO₂ scapegoat. From then on, the vital CO₂ was demonized under a scientific guise.

 

The CO₂ certificate indulgence trade, reminiscent of the sale of indulgences in medieval church history, could begin. As a result, this crime became a very profitable business model. As in a detective story, the real perpetrators of climate change have therefore acted with diabolical calculation from the outset and have laid a false trail. In order to continue experimenting with criminal climate weapons in secret, all climate change had to be blamed on the CO₂ scapegoat. The real climate criminals have always been able to hide in the dark behind a supposedly scientifically proven CO₂ thesis. This means that the CO₂ theory ultimately turns out to be a pure diversionary tactic to protect the actual perpetrators. Under no circumstances was the public allowed to find out what a devious crime was actually being committed. In plain language, however, this also means that the entire sincere climate movement has been instrumentalized and abused for criminal purposes. Sincere people who have campaigned for the protection of the global climate have allowed themselves to be harnessed to their "CO₂ cart".

 

Military and commercial objectives were pursued under the charitable pretext of saving the climate and nature by reducing CO₂ emissions. A look behind the curtain of climate criminals The famous saying "Follow the money" is used as advice to analyze money flows in order to uncover motives, backers or corrupt networks.

 

It fits into the picture that the Rockefeller family, of all people, is a major sponsor of the CO₂-framed climate movement. The Rockefeller family plays a leading role in freemasonry. This secret society as well as the Rockefeller Foundations pretend in public to support charitable goals. But what are their real goals? The common goal of the high-degree freemasons is the establishment of a New World Order with a one-world government - for their benefit and not for the benefit of the world's population. David Rockefeller outlined the path to achieving this goal as follows: "We are on the verge of a global transformation. All that is needed is the right major crisis and the nations will accept the New World Order. These world domination obsessives are thus working with crises on a grand scale to get the world’s population to not only affirm a world dictatorship, but to downright desire it. In addition to terrorist crises such as 9-11, alleged pandemic crises, all possible or real threats of world war, the climate crisis caused by weather weapons must also be counted among the crises of major proportions."

 

"In order to be able to stage these crises on a large scale, the actors in the background are dependent on the support of the mass media." That's why David Rockefeller said many, many years ago, "We are grateful to the Washington Post, the New York Times, Time magazine and other great publications, whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost 40 years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subject to the bright lights of publicity."

 

For this reason, the role of the mass media must also be clarified in conclusion. The role of the media financed by compulsory levies. The example of the climate debate is a very good illustration of the influence of the public media on people's perceptions. Although the existence of weather weapons has been proven for decades, these weapons are not perceived by the public as existing in any way. Instead, the average citizen concludes that unusual weather phenomena are always directly linked to the increased CO₂ emissions caused by humans and the resulting climate change. After all, this is how it was instilled in them over decades on all channels of the system media. On the other hand, information about military weather weapons was withheld from the public. An emerging public debate about such weapons systems was nipped in the bud by the media and the spraying of toxic substances over the heads of all citizens was relegated to the realm of conspiracy theories. In this way, the media financed by compulsory levies serve a small minority and their interests.

 

Dear viewers, kla.tv has been warning for years: "Bought mass media, above all the public broadcasters, are among the most dangerous organizations in the world!" They did not uncover the criminal machinations in the climate debate either, but hushed them up and thus became actors. ARD, ZDF, ORF, SRF and Co. have disqualified themselves.

For example, how much longer do we want to allow substances to be sprayed over our homes and gardens and poison our food? The order of the day is therefore for citizens to inform citizens. Take the time now and make this documentary known to your circle of friends. You can also use social media such as WhatsApp, Facebook, TikTok or even X. The displayed short link will help you with the dissemination.

from SVW

Sources/Links:

Forest fires are raging in southern California

https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Waldbr%C3%A4nde_in_S%C3%BCdkalifornien_im_Januar_2025 https://www.tagesschau.de/wissen/klima/klimawandel-waldbraende-kalifornien-100.html

The storm Éowyn

https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sturmtief_%C3%89owyn https://www.tagesschau.de/ausland/europa/sturm-eowyn-aufraeumarbeiten-100.html

The Swiss mountain village Blatten

https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bergsturz_von_Blatten https://www.tagesschau.de/wissen/klima/bergrutsch-ursachen-100.html

Huge floods in Texas

https://www.spiegel.de/ausland/texas-sturzflut-mit-vielen-toten-klimawandel-und-politik-im-fokus-a-00686524-5289-42d6-8357-9d8d4fc5ad64

Was climate change to blame

https://www.zeit.de/wissen/2025-07/fluten-texas-ueberschwemmung-naturkatastrophe-warnsystem

Greece and Turkey are fighting record heat and forest fires

https://www.br.de/nachrichten/deutschland-welt/griechenland-und-tuerkei-kaempfen-gegen-rekordhitze-und-waldbraende,Us9cTPb https://www.tagesschau.de/faktenfinder/kontext/klimawandel-co2-ausstoss-100.html https://www.swr.de/swrkultur/wissen/schon-wenige-prozente-co2-fuehren-zu-erderwaermung-102.html

Climate change is progressing – weakened by less CO2

https://www.zdfheute.de/politik/klimawandel-deutschland-welt-folgen-daten-100.html

CO2 share in the air

https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luft https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P10rhRkaL-g https://www.verivox.de/gas/themen/co2-ausstoss/

The European Parliament

https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-4-1999-0005_DE.html

UN NMOD Convention

https://t.me/WernerAltnickelAbsicherung/3905 https://www.fedlex.admin.ch/eli/cc/1988/1888_1888_1888/de

Former US Secretary of Defense Dr. William Cohen

https://t.me/WernerAltnickelAbsicherung/3903

Numerous patents confirm the existence of climate weapons

https://t.me/WernerAltnickelAbsicherung/5510 https://www.chemtrail.de/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/art1.pdf https://t.me/WernerAltnickelAbsicherung/5511 https://t.me/WernerAltnickelAbsicherung/5513 https://t.me/WernerAltnickelAbsicherung/5514 https://www.kla.tv/28095 https://www.kla.tv/28593

Former FBI chief Ted Gunderson

https://t.me/WernerAltnickelAbsicherung/5513 https://t.me/WernerAltnickelAbsicherung/5514

Military interest in weather manipulation

https://t.me/WernerAltnickelAbsicherung/5511 https://www.kla.tv/28095

Cologne cathedral under water

https://www.spiegel.de/spiegel/print/index-1986-33.html

A look behind the climate criminals’ curtain

https://www.kla.tv/37517 https://www.kla.tv/13466

The spraying of highly toxic substances over the heads of all citizens was categorically banned to the realm of conspiracy theories.

https://www.deutschlandfunkkultur.de/chemtrails-9-11-und-co-wie-man-verschwoerungstheorien-100.html https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EQEMki5IDQ8

 

USA is pulling nukes out of Turkey

 USA is pulling nukes out of Turkey 

by Belit Onay

February 24, 2020

As reported earlier, Air Mobility Command’s C-17A Globemaster III arrived at Incerlik AB, Turkey from Sicily, Italy on February, 20 as part of US-led exercise Defender Europe 2020, Air Mobility Command officials said.

Five more C-17A Globemasters III arrived to Incerlik AB from Ramstein Air Base on February, 21. Our sources at Incerlik AB confirm that the presence of five additional transport aircraft is a clear evidence of getting the whole bulk of nukes (that are currently stored at Incerlik AB amid tensions in Syria) out to Germany, Poland and one of the Baltic states. Five nuclear bombs are to be transported to Poland and one of the Baltic states accordingly with the rest of the stock to be delivered to Germany.

Besides, there’s a forward-deployed nuclear weapons storage depot for Defender Europe 2020 in Powidz. 

NORSK -- Manlio Dinucci -- Hva er den virkelige atomtrusselen i Midt-Østen?

Hva er den virkelige atomtrusselen i Midt-Østen?

av Manlio Dinucci

Uttalelsen fra Iran om tilbaketrekking fra atomavtalen 5 + 1 (Joint Comprehensive Action Plan) som svar på attentatet mot general Qassem Soleimani vil ikke bety noe siden USA allerede har kansellert sin deltakelse i den. Det er langt mer bekymringsfullt at Israel har sitt eget reelle atomarsenal, og kan fristes til å bruke det i tilfelle en tilbaketrekking av amerikanske tropper fra Midt-Østen

VOLTAIRE NETWORK | ROMA (ITALIA) | 19 JANVIER 2020 

FRANÇAIS  ITALIANO  ESPAÑOL  PORTUGUÊS  ROMÂNĂ  TÜRKÇE  ENGLISH  NEDERLANDS  DEUTSCH 

Italienske medier melder om: «Iran respekterer ikke atomavtalene» (Il Tempo), «Iran trekker seg fra atomavtalene - et skritt mot atombomben» (Corriere della Sera), «Iran forbereder atombomber - farvel til atomavtalen» (Libero). Etter attentatet mot general Soleimani beordret av president Trump, er dette måten nesten alle mediene har lagt fram Irans beslutning om ikke lenger å godta begrensningene for berikelse av uran planlagt i 2015 av 5 + 1-gruppen (USA, Frankrike , Storbritannia, Russland, Kina, pluss Tyskland).

Five nuclear-armed states must work together to neutralize threat of ‘global war’ – Putin

Five nuclear-armed states must work together to neutralize threat of ‘global war’ – Putin

15 Jan, 2020 10:19 / Updated 3 hours ago

Get short URL

A UN Security Council meeting. © AFP / UN / Mark Garten

The nuclear-armed countries, permanent UN Security Council members, must work on a common approach aimed at preventing a global war, Russian President Vladimir Putin has said.

Putin made the comments during his annual state-of-the-nation address on Wednesday.

The president said the five permanent members of the UN Security Council – the US, China, Russia, Britain and France – carry a “special responsibility for securing the sustainable development of humanity.”

These five nations must begin to devise measures aimed at neutralizing any conditions for a global war, and develop new approaches towards securing the stability of the planet.

He previously expressed “deep concern” over the recent flare-up of tensions between the US and Iran, which almost put the two countries on a brink of war. Both states did not mince words after Washington ordered the drone strike which killed senior Iranian military commander Qassem Soleimani in Iraq. Moscow urged everyone to show restraint and seek diplomatic means to defuse the conflict.

Talking national security and latest add-ons to Russia's military arsenal, Putin stated that Moscow is “not threatening anyone and does not seek to impose its will” on other countries.

At the same time, for the first time in history, Russia is “not catching up” to anyone in terms of its defense capabilities.

Instead, "it is the other countries" that are racing to develop advanced weapons that Russia already posseses.

DE -- Manlio Dinucci -- Was ist die wirkliche nukleare Bedrohung im Nahen Osten?

Was ist die wirkliche nukleare Bedrohung im Nahen Osten?

von Manlio Dinucci

DEUTSCH ENGLISH FRANÇAIS ITALIANO PORTUGUÊS 

ROMÎNA  SPANISH TÜRKÇE

„Der Iran hält sich nicht an die Nuklearabkommen“ (Il Tempo), „Iran zieht sich aus den Nuklearabkommen zurück - ein Schritt in Richtung Atombombe“ (Corriere della Sera), „Iran bereitet Atombomben vor - Abschied vom Atomabkommen“ (Libero). Auf diese Weise haben fast alle Medien die Entscheidung des Iran nach der von Präsident Trump angeordneten Ermordung von General Soleimani dargestellt, die für 2015 geplanten Beschränkungen der Urananreicherung durch die 5+1-Gruppe (USA, Frankreich, Großbritannien, Russland, China und Deutschland) nicht mehr zu akzeptieren.

Diese „informationsorgane“ haben also offensichtlich keinen Zweifel an der Quelle der nuklearen Bedrohung im Nahen Osten. Sie vergessen, dass es Präsident Trump war, der 2018 die USA aus dem Abkommen, das Israel als „die Kapitulation des Westens vor der vom Iran geführten Achse des Bösen“ bezeichnet hatte, zurückgezogen hat. Sie sagen kein Wort darüber, dass es im Nahen Osten nur eine einzige Atommacht gibt - Israel -, die keiner Form der Kontrolle unterworfen ist, weil sie sich nicht an den Atomwaffensperrvertrag hält, der jedoch vom Iran unterzeichnet ist.

Das durch einen dichten Mantel aus Geheimhaltung und Omertà abgeschirmte Arsenal Israels wird auf 80 bis 400 Atomsprengköpfe geschätzt, zuzüglich genügend Plutonium, um Hunderte von weiteren zu bauen. Israel produziert sicherlich auch Tritium, ein radioaktives Gas, mit dem es Atomwaffen der neuen Generation baut. Dazu gehören Minibomben und Neutronenbomben, die, da sie eine minimale radioaktive Verseuchung verursachen, besser für Ziele in der Nähe von Israel geeignet wären. Die israelischen Nuklearsprengköpfe sind bereit für den Abschuss durch ballistische Raketen, die mit der Jericho 3 eine Reichweite von 8.000 bis 9.000 Kilometern haben. Deutschland lieferte an Israel (als Geschenk oder zum Schleuderpreis) vier für den Start von Popeye Turbo Atomraketen modifizierte Dolphin-U-Boote mit einer Reichweite von etwa 1.500 Kilometern. Lautlos und mit der Fähigkeit, eine Woche lang unter Wasser zu bleiben, fahren die Dolphins im östlichen Mittelmeer, im Roten Meer und im Persischen Golf und sind rund um die Uhr für einen Atomangriff einsatzbereit.

Die Vereinigten Staaten, die Israel bereits mehr als 350 F-15 und F-16 Jagdbomber geliefert haben, liefern derzeit mindestens 75 F-35 Jäger aus, die ebenfalls sowohl über konventionelle als auch über nukleare Kapazitäten verfügen. Das erste Geschwader der israelischen F-35 wurde im Dezember 2017 einsatzbereit. Israel Aerospace Industries stellt Tragflächenkomponenten her, die die F-35 für den Radar unsichtbar machen. Mit dieser Technologie, die auch bei den italienischen F-35 angewendet wird, potenziert Israel die Angriffskapazitäten seiner Nuklearstreitkräfte.

Israel, mit 200 Atomwaffen, die permanent auf den Iran gerichtet sind, wie der ehemalige US-Außenminister Colin Powell 2015 [1] angedeutet hat, ist entschlossen, sein Monopol der Bombe im Nahen Osten aufrechtzuerhalten, indem es den Iran daran hindert, ein ziviles Atomprogramm zu entwickeln, das eines Tages den Bau von Atomwaffen ermöglichen könnte, eine Befugnis, die heute Dutzende von Ländern auf der ganzen Welt haben. Im Kreislauf der Urangewinnung gibt es keine klare Grenze zwischen der zivilen und militärischen Nutzung von spaltbarem Material. Um das iranische Nuklearprogramm zu blockieren, ist Israel entschlossen, alle Mittel einzusetzen, die ihm zur Verfügung stehen. Die Ermordung von vier iranischen Atomwissenschaftlern zwischen 2010 und 2012 war höchstwahrscheinlich das Werk des Mossad.

Die israelischen Nuklearstreitkräfte sind im Rahmen des „Individuellen Kooperationsprogramms“ mit Israel, einem Land, das nicht Mitglied des Bündnisses ist, aber eine ständige Mission im Hauptquartier des Bündnisses in Brüssel hat, in das elektronische System der NATO integriert. Nach dem Plan, der bei der Übung Juniper Cobra 2018 getestet wurde, würden die amerikanischen Streitkräfte über Europa (vor allem von italienischen Stützpunkten aus) eintreffen, um Israel in einem Krieg gegen den Iran [2] zu unterstützen, ein Krieg, der mit einem israelischen Angriff auf iranische Nuklearanlagen beginnen könnte, wie er auf dem iranischen Gelände von Osiraq durchgeführt wurde. Die Jerusalem Post [3] bestätigt, dass Israel über nicht-nukleare Anti-Bunker-Bomben verfügt, die insbesondere mit den F-35, die den iranischen Nuklearstandort Fordow treffen können, eingesetzt werden können. Aber der Iran, obwohl er keine Atomwaffen besitzt, verfügt über eine militärische Abwehrkapazität, die Jugoslawien, Irak und Libyen zum Zeitpunkt der Angriffe der USA und der NATO nicht besaßen. In diesem Fall könnte Israel eine Atomwaffe einsetzen, indem er eine Kettenreaktion auslöst, die unvorhersehbare Folgen hat.

il manifesto, 07.Januari 2020

Übersetzung: K.R.

http://www.natoexit.it/en/home-en/
http://www.natoexit.it/

ERKLÄRUNG VON FLORENZ

FÜR EINE INTERNATIONALE NATO-AUSTRITTS-FRONT

DANSK DEUTSCH ENGLISH ESPAÑOL  FRANÇAIS ITALIANO

NEDERLANDS PORTUGUÊS ROMÎNA SLOVENSKÝ SVENSKA

TÜRKÇE РУССКИЙ

Manlio Dinucci

Geograph und Geopolitiker. Seine neuesten Bücher sind Laboratorio di geografia, Zanichelli 2014 ; Diario di viaggio, Zanichelli 2017 ; L’arte della guerra / Annali della strategia Usa/Nato 1990-2016, Zambon 2016, Guerra Nucleare. Il Giorno Prima 2017; Diario di guerra Asterios Editores 2018, Premio internazionale per l'analisi geostrategica assegnato il 7 giugno 2019 dal Club dei giornalisti del Messico, A.C.

NL -- Manlio Dinucci -- Wat is de Echte Nucleaire Dreiging in het Midden-Oosten?

Wat is de Echte Nucleaire Dreiging in het Midden-Oosten?

door: Manlio Dinucci

ENGLISH FRANÇAIS ITALIANO PORTUGUÊS ROMÎNA  SPANISH TÜRKÇE

De aankondiging van Iran dat het zich terugtrekt uit de 5+1 nucleaire overeenkomst (Gemeenschappelijk Alomvattend Actieplan) naar aanleiding van de moord op generaal Qassem Soleimani zal niets betekenen, aangezien de Verenigde Staten hun deelname al hebben geannuleerd. Het is veel zorgwekkender dat Israël zijn eigen echte nucleaire arsenaal heeft en in de verleiding zou kunnen komen dit te gebruiken in geval van een terugtrekking van de Amerikaanse troepen uit het Midden-Oosten.

« Iran houdt zich niet aan de nucleaire akkoorden " (Il Tempo), " Iran trekt zich terug uit de nucleaire akkoorden - een stap richting de atoombom " (Corriere della Sera), " Iran bereidt atoombommen voor - een vaarwel aan het nucleaire akkoord " (Libero). Dit is de manier waarop bijna alle media het besluit van Iran hebben gepresenteerd, na de moord op generaal Soleimani op bevel van President Trump, om niet langer de beperkingen op de verrijking van uranium te accepteren die in 2015 door de 5+1-groep zijn gepland (Verenigde Staten, Frankrijk, het Verenigd Koninkrijk, Rusland, China, plus Duitsland).

Deze organen van " informatie " zijn dus duidelijk de bron van de nucleaire dreiging in het Midden-Oosten. Ze vergeten dat het President Trump was die in 2018 de VS uit het akkoord trok, dat Israël had omschreven als "de overgave van het Westen aan de As van het Kwaad, geleid door Iran". Ze zeggen geen woord over het feit dat er in het Midden-Oosten slechts één nucleaire macht is - Israël - die aan geen enkele vorm van controle is onderworpen omdat ze zich niet houdt aan het non-proliferatieverdrag, dat echter wel door Iran is ondertekend.

Het Israëlische - arsenaal, afgeschermd door een dichte mantel van geheimzinnigheid en omertà, wordt geschat op tussen de 80 en 400 kernkoppen, plus voldoende plutonium om honderden andere te bouwen. Israël produceert zeker ook tritium, een radioactief gas waarmee het een nieuwe generatie kernwapens bouwt. Daaronder zijn minikernkoppen en neutronenbommen die, omdat ze een minimale radioactieve besmetting veroorzaken, meer geschikt zouden zijn voor doelen in de buurt van Israël. De Israëlische - kernkoppen zijn klaar voor lancering op ballistische raketten die, met de Jericho 3, een bereik hebben van 8 tot 9.000 kilometer. Duitsland leverde Israël (in de vorm van een geschenk of voor knock-outprijzen) vier voor de lancering van Popeye Turbo-kernraketten aangepaste dolfijnonderzeeërs, met een bereik van ongeveer 1500 kilometer. Stille, en met de capaciteit om een week onder water te blijven, varen de dolfijnen in de oostelijke Middellandse Zee, de Rode Zee en de Perzische Golf, klaar voor een 24-uurs alertheid voor een nucleaire aanval.

De Verenigde Staten, die al meer dan 350 F-15 en F-16 jachtbommenwerpers aan Israël hebben geleverd, leveren momenteel ten minste 75 F-35 gevechtsvliegtuigen, die ook zowel conventionele als nucleaire capaciteit hebben. Het eerste eskader van Israëlische F-35's werd operationeel in december 2017. Israël Aerospace Industries produceert vleugelonderdelen die de F-35's onzichtbaar maken voor de radar. Met deze technologie, die ook zal worden toegepast op de Italiaanse F-35's, versterkt Israël de aanvalscapaciteiten van zijn kernkrachten.

Israël, met 200 kernwapens die permanent gericht zijn op Iran, zoals de voormalige Amerikaanse minister van Buitenlandse Zaken Colin Powell in 2015 heeft aangegeven [1], is vastbesloten zijn monopolie op de bom in het Midden-Oosten te handhaven door te voorkomen dat Iran een civiel nucleair programma ontwikkelt dat op een dag de bouw van kernwapens mogelijk zou maken, een capaciteit die vandaag de dag door tientallen landen in de hele wereld in bezit is. In de cyclus van de exploitatie van uranium is er geen duidelijke scheidslijn tussen civiel en militair gebruik van splijtbaar materiaal. Om het Iraanse kernprogramma te blokkeren, is Israël vastbesloten om alle mogelijke middelen te gebruiken. De moord op vier Iraanse kernwetenschappers tussen 2010 en 2012 was hoogstwaarschijnlijk het werk van de Mossad.

De Israëlische nucleaire strijdkrachten zijn geïntegreerd in het elektronische systeem van de NAVO, in het kader van het "Individual Cooperation Programme" met Israël, een land dat geen lid is van de alliantie, maar een permanente missie heeft in het hoofdkwartier van de alliantie in Brussel. Volgens het plan dat werd getest tijdens de USA-Israël oefening Juniper Cobra 2018, zouden de Amerikaanse strijdkrachten via Europa aankomen (vooral vanuit de bases in Italië) om Israël te steunen in een oorlog tegen Iran [2], een oorlog die zou kunnen beginnen met een Israëlische aanval op Iraanse nucleaire sites, zoals die op de Iraanse site van Osiraq werd uitgevoerd. De Jerusalem Post [3] bevestigt dat Israël niet-nucleaire anti-bunkerbommen bezit, die vooral gebruikt kunnen worden met de F-35's, die de Iraanse nucleaire site in Fordow kunnen treffen. Maar Iran heeft, hoewel het geen kernwapens heeft, een militaire riposteercapaciteit, die Joegoslavië, Irak en Libië niet bezaten op het moment van de aanvallen van de VS en de NAVO. In dit geval zou Israël een kernwapen kunnen gebruiken door een kettingreactie op gang te brengen met onvoorspelbare gevolgen.

il manifesto, 7 January 2020

Nederlandse Vertaling: Martien

http://www.natoexit.it/en/home-en/

http://www.natoexit.it/

DECLARATIE VAN FLORENCE

VOOR EEN INTERNATIONAAL FRONT NAVO-EXIT

DANSK DEUTSCH ENGLISH ESPAÑOL  FRANÇAIS ITALIANO  NEDERLANDS

PORTUGUÊS ROMÎNA SLOVENSKÝ SVENSKA TÜRKÇE РУССКИЙ 

Manlio Dinucci

Geographer and geopolitical scientist. His latest books are Laboratorio di geografia, Zanichelli 2014 ; Diario di viaggio, Zanichelli 2017 ; L’arte della guerra / Annali della strategia Usa/Nato 1990-2016, Zambon 2016, Guerra Nucleare. Il Giorno Prima 2017; Diario di guerra Asterios Editores 2018, Premio internazionale per l'analisi geostrategica assegnato il 7 giugno 2019 dal Club dei giornalisti del Messico, A.C.

EN -- Manlio Dinucci -- What is the real nuclear threat in the Middle East?

What is the real nuclear threat in the Middle East?

by Manlio Dinucci

FRANÇAIS ITALIANO PORTUGUÊS ROMÎNA  SPANISH TÜRKÇE

« Iran is not respecting the nuclear agreements » (Il Tempo), « Iran withdraws from the nuclear agreements – a step towards the atomic bomb » (Corriere della Sera), « Iran is preparing atomic bombs – goodbye to the nuclear agreement » (Libero) . This is the way that almost all of the media have presented Iran's decision, after the assassination of General Soleimani ordered by President Trump, to no longer accept the limitations on the enrichment of uranium planned in 2015 by the 5+1Group (United States,  France, the United Kingdom, Russia, China, plus Germany).

So these organs of « information » are obviously in no doubt as to the source of the nuclear threat in the Middle East. They are forgetting that  it was President Trump, in 2018, who withdrew the USA from the agreement, which Israël had described as « the surrender of the West to the Axis of Evil guided by Iran ». They do not say a word about the fact that there is only one nuclear power in the Middle East – Israël - which is not submitted to any form of control because it does not adhere to the Non-Proliferation Treaty, which is, however, signed by Iran.

The Israëli arsenal, shielded by a dense cloak of secrecy and omertà, is estimated at between 80 and 400 nuclear warheads, plus sufficient plutonium to build hundreds of others. Israël certainly also produces  tritium, a radioactive gas with which it is building new generation nuclear weapons. Among these are mini-nukes and neutron bombs which, since they cause minimal radioactive contamination, would be more adapted to targets close to Israël. The Israëli nuclear warheads are ready for launching on ballistic missiles which, with the Jericho 3, have a range of 8 to 9,000 kilometres. Germany supplied Israël (in the form of a gift or for knock-down prices) with four Dolphin submarines modified for launching Popeye Turbo nuclear missiles, with a range of approximately 1,500 kilometres. Silent, and with the capacity to remain under water for a week, the Dolphins are cruising in the Eastern Mediterranean, the Red Sea and the Persian Gulf, ready on twenty-four hour alert for a nuclear attack.

The United States, which have already supplied Israël with more than  350 F-15 and F-16 fighter-bombers, are currently delivering at least 75 F-35 fighters, which also have both conventional and nuclear capacity. The first squadron of Israëli F-35's became operational in December 2017. Israël Aerospace Industries produce wing components which make the F-35's invisible to radar. With this technology, which will also  be applied to Italian F-35's, Israël is potentiating the attack capacities of its nuclear forces.

Israël, with 200 nuclear weapons permanently aimed at Iran, as was indicated by ex-US Secretary of State Colin Powell in 2015 [1], is determined to maintain its monopoly of the Bomb in the Middle East, by preventing Iran from developing a civil nuclear programme which might one day enable the construction of nuclear weapons, a capacity which is today possessed by dozens of countries throughout the world. In the cycle of the exploitation of uranium, there is no clear line between civil and military use of fissile material. In order to block the Iranian nuclear programme, Israël is determined to use whatever means it can. The assassination of four Iranian nuclear scientists between 2010 and  2012 was most probably the work of Mossad.

Israëli nuclear forces are integrated in NATO's electronic system, in the framework of the « Individual Cooperation Programme » with Israël, a country which is not a member of the Alliance, but has a permanent mission at the Alliance's headquarters in Brussels. According to the plan tested during the USA-Israël exercise Juniper Cobra 2018, US forces would arrive via Europe (especially from bases in Italy) to support Israël in a war against Iran [2], a war which could start with an Israëli attack on Iranian nuclear sites, like the one made on the Iranian site of Osiraq. The  Jerusalem Post [3] confirms that Israël possesses non-nuclear anti-bunker bombs, which can be used particularly with the F-35's, able to hit the Iranian nuclear site at Fordow. But Iran, although it has no nuclear weapons, has a military riposte capacity, which Yugoslavia, Iraq and Libya did not possess at the moment of the attacks by the USA and NATO. In this case, Israël could use a nuclear weapon by triggering a chain reaction causing unforeseeable results.

[1] « Israël : 200 armes nucléaires pointées sur l’Iran », par Manlio Dinucci, Traduction Marie-Ange Patrizio, Il Manifesto (Italie) , Réseau Voltaire, 15 mai 2018.

[2] « Sous l’emprise des USA et de l’Otan », par Manlio Dinucci, Traduction Marie-Ange Patrizio, Il Manifesto (Italie) , Réseau Voltaire, 13 mars 2018. Et « Droit de réponse de l’Otan, réplique de Manlio Dinucci et commentaire du Réseau Voltaire », 17 mars 2018.

[3] “Would Israel still need US bunker busters for attacking Iranian nukes ?”, Yonah Jeremy Bob, Jerusalem Post, January 3, 2020.

il manifesto, 07 January 2020

Translator: Pete Kimberley

http://www.natoexit.it/en/home-en/

http://www.natoexit.it/

DECLARATION OF FLORENCE

FOR AN INTERNATIONAL FRONT NATO EXIT
DANSK DEUTSCH ENGLISH ESPAÑOL  FRANÇAIS ITALIANO  NEDERLANDS
PORTUGUÊS ROMÎNA SLOVENSKÝ SVENSKA TÜRKÇE РУССКИЙ

Manlio Dinucci

Geographer and geopolitical scientist. His latest books are Laboratorio di geografia, Zanichelli 2014 ; Diario di viaggio, Zanichelli 2017 ; L’arte della guerra / Annali della strategia Usa/Nato 1990-2016, Zambon 2016, Guerra Nucleare. Il Giorno Prima 2017; Diario di guerra Asterios Editores 2018, Premio internazionale per l'analisi geostrategica assegnato il 7 giugno 2019 dal Club dei giornalisti del Messico, A.C.