Arguably, no one has been
more active in promoting and funding research on vaccines aimed at dealing with
coronavirus than Bill Gates and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. From
sponsoring a simulation of a coronavirus global pandemic, just weeks before the
Wuhan outbreak was announced, to funding numerous corporate efforts to come up
with a novel vaccine for the apparently novel virus, the Gates presence is
there. What does it actually entail?
We must admit that at the
very least Bill Gates is prophetic. He has claimed for years that a global
killer pandemic will come and that we are not prepared for it. On March 18,
2015 Gates gave a TED talk on epidemics in Vancouver. That day he wrote on his
blog, “I just gave a brief talk on a subject that I’ve been learning a lot
about lately—epidemics. The Ebola outbreak in West Africa is a tragedy—as I
write this, more than 10,000 people have died.” Gates then added, “As awful as
this epidemic has been, the next one could be much worse. The world is simply
not prepared to deal with a disease—an especially virulent flu, for
example—that infects large numbers of people very quickly. Of all the things
that could kill 10 million people or more, by far the most likely is an epidemic.”
That same year, 2015, Bill
Gates wrote an article for the New England Journal of Medicine titled,
“The Next Epidemic: Lessons from Ebola.” There he spoke of a special class of
drugs that “involves giving patients a set of particular RNA-based constructs
that enables them to produce specific proteins(including antibodies).Although
this is a very new area, it is promising because it is possible that a safe
therapy could be designed and put into large-scale manufacture fairly rapidly.
More basic research as well as the progress of companies like Moderna and
CureVac could eventually make this approach a key tool for stopping epidemics.” Moderna and CureVac both
today receive funds from the Gates Foundation and are leading the race to develop
an approved COVID-19 vaccine based on mRNA.
2017 and Founding of CEPI
A global flu-like pandemic
in fact is something that Gates and his well-endowed foundation have spent
years preparing for. In 2017 during the Davos World Economic Forum, Gates initiated
something called CEPI, the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations,
together with the governments of Norway, India, Japan, and Germany, along with
the Wellcome Trust of the UK. Its stated purpose is to “accelerate the
development of vaccines we’ll need to contain outbreaks” of future epidemics. He noted at the time that “One
promising area of vaccine development research is using advances in genomics to
map the DNA and RNA of pathogens and make vaccines.” We will return to that.
Event 201
By 2019 Bill Gates and the
foundation were going full-tilt boogie with their pandemic scenarios. He made a
Netflix video which made an eerie imaginary scenario. The video, part of the
“Explained” series, imagined a wet market in China where live and dead animals
are stacked and a highly deadly virus erupts that spreads globally. Gates
appears as an expert in the video to warn, “If you think of anything that could
come along that would kill millions of people, a pandemic is our greatest
risk.” He said if nothing was done to better prepare for pandemics, the time
would come when the world would look back and wish it had invested more into
potential vaccines. That was weeks before the world heard about bats and a live
wet market in Wuhan China.
In October, 2019 the Gates Foundation
teamed up with the World Economic Forum and the Johns Hopkins Center for Health
Security to enact what they called a “fictional” scenario simulation involving
some of the world’s leading figures in public health. It was titled Event 201.
As their website describes
it, Event 201 simulated an “outbreak of a novel zoonotic coronavirus
transmitted from bats to pigs to people that eventually becomes efficiently
transmissible from person to person, leading to a severe pandemic. The pathogen
and the disease it causes are modeled largely on SARS, but it is more
transmissible in the community setting by people with mild symptoms.”
In the Event 201 scenario
the disease originates at a pig farm in Brazil, spreading through low-income
regions and ultimately explodes into an epidemic. The disease is carried by air
travel to Portugal, the USA and China and beyond to the point no country can
control it. The scenario posits no possible vaccine being available in the
first year. “Since the whole human population is susceptible, during the
initial months of the pandemic, the cumulative number of cases increases
exponentially, doubling every week.”
The scenario then ends after
18 months when the fictional coronavirus has caused 65 million deaths. “The
pandemic is beginning to slow due to the decreasing number of susceptible
people. The pandemic will continue at some rate until there is an effective
vaccine or until 80-90 % of the global population has been exposed.”
Event 201 Players
As interesting as the
prescient Gates-Johns Hopkins Event 201 fictional scenario of October, 2019 may
be, the list of panelists who were invited to participate in the imaginary
global response is equally interesting.
Among the selected “players”
as they were called, was George Fu Gao. Notably, Prof. Gao is director of the
Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention since 2017. His
specialization includes research on “influenza virus interspecies transmission
(host jump)… He is also interested in virus ecology, especially the
relationship between influenza virus and migratory birds or live poultry
markets and the bat-derived virus ecology and molecular biology.” Bat-derived virus ecology…
Prof. Gao was joined among
others at the panel by the former Deputy Director of the CIA during the Obama
term, Avril Haines. She also served as Obama’s Assistant to the President and
Principal Deputy National Security Advisor. Another of the players at the Gates
event was Rear Admiral Stephen C. Redd, Director of the Office of Public Health
Preparedness and Response at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).
The same CDC is at the center of a huge scandal for not having adequate
functioning tests available for testing cases of COVID-19 in the USA. Their
preparedness was anything but laudable.
Rounding out the group was
Adrian Thomas, the Vice President of scandal-ridden Johnson & Johnson, the
giant medical and pharmaceutical company. Thomas is responsible for pandemic
preparedness at J&J including developing vaccines for Ebola, Dengue Fever,
HIV. And there was Martin Knuchel, Head of Crisis, Emergency & Business
Continuity Management, for Lufthansa Group Airlines. Lufthansa has been one of
the major airlines dramatically cutting flights during the COVID-19 pandemic
crisis.
All this shows that Bill
Gates has had a remarkable preoccupation with the possibility of a global
pandemic outbreak he said could be even larger than the alleged deaths from the
mysterious 1918 Spanish Flu, and has been warning for at least the past five years
or more. What the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation also has been involved in
is funding development of new vaccines using bleeding-edge CRISPR gene-editing
and other technologies.
The Coronavirus Vaccines
Gates Foundation money is
backing vaccine development on every front. Inovio Pharmaceuticals of
Pennsylvania received $9 million from the Gates-backed CEPI, Coalition for
Epidemic Preparedness Innovations, to develop a vaccine, INO-4800, which is
about to test on humans in April, a suspiciously rapid time frame. In addition
Gates Foundation just gave the company an added $5 million to develop a
proprietary smart device for intradermal delivery of the new vaccine.
In addition Gates Foundation
monies via CEPI are financing development of a radical new vaccine method known
as messengerRNA or mRNA.
They are co-funding the
Cambridge, Massachusetts biotech company, Moderna Inc., to develop a vaccine
against the Wuhan novel coronavirus, now called SARS-CoV-2. Moderna’s other
partner is the US National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID),
a part of the National Institutes of Health (NIH). Head of NIAID is Dr Anthony
Fauci, the person at the center of the Trump Administration virus emergency
response. Notable about the Fauci-Gates Moderna coronavirus vaccine, mRNA-1273,
is that it has been rolled out in a matter of weeks, not years, and on February
24 went directly to Fauci’s NIH for tests on human guinea pigs, not on mice as
normal. Moderna’s chief medical adviser, Tal Zaks, argued, “I don’t think
proving this in an animal model is on the critical path to getting this to
a clinical trial.”
Another notable admission by
Moderna on its website is the legal disclaimer, “Special Note Regarding
Forward-Looking Statements: …These risks, uncertainties, and other factors
include, among others: … the fact that there has never been a commercial
product utilizing mRNA technology approved for use.” In other words, completely unproven
for human health and safety.
Another biotech company
working with unproven mRNA technology to develop a vaccine for the COVID-19 is
a German company, CureVac. Since 2015 CureVac has received money from the Gates
Foundation to develop its own mRNA technology. In January the Gates-backed CEPI granted
more than $8 million to develop a mRNA vaccine for the novel coronavirus.
Add to this the fact that the Gates Foundation and related entities such
as CEPI constitute the largest funders of the public-private entity known as
WHO, and that its current director, Tedros Adhanom, the first WHO director in
history not a medical doctor, worked for years on HIV with the Gates Foundation
when Tedros was a government minister in Ethiopia, and we see that there is
practically no area of the current coronavirus pandemic where the footprints of
the omnipresent Gates are not to be found. If that is to the good of mankind or
grounds to be worried, time will tell.
F. William Engdahl is
strategic risk consultant and lecturer, he holds a degree in politics
from Princeton University and is a best-selling author on oil and
geopolitics, exclusively for the online magazine “New Eastern Outlook.”
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.